Renal artery stenosis evaluated with 3D-Gd-magnetic resonance angiography using transstenotic pressure gradient as the standard of reference. A multireader study

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 46, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 802-809

  Eklof H ^a   Ahlstrom, H ^a   Bostrom, A ^a   Bergqvist, D ^a   Andren B ^a   Karacagil, S ^a   Nyman, R ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; RADIOLOGY;

DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY (DSA); MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY (MRA); PRESSURE GRADIENT MEASUREMENT (PGM);

ANGIOGRAPHY;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE; COLLATERAL CIRCULATION; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KIDNEY ARTERY STENOSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RENAL ARTERY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; BLOOD PRESSURE; COLLATERAL CIRCULATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RENAL ARTERY; RENAL ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 30844432858     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02841850500335010     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bergqvist D, Jonsson K, Weibull H. Complications after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of peripheral and renal arteries. Acta Radiol 1987;28:3-12.
2. Bland M. An introduction to medical statistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
3. Boijsen E. Angiographic studies of the anatomy of single and multiple renal arteries. Acta Radiol 1959;Suppl 183:1-135.
4. Cochran ST, Bomyea K, Sayre JW. Trends in adverse events after IV administration of contrast media. Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:1385-8.
5. Finke R, Gross R, Hackenthal E, Huber J, Kirchheim HR. Threshold pressure for the pressure-dependent renin release in the autoregulating kidney of conscious dogs. Pflugers Arch 1983;399:102-10.
6. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1981.
7. Gross CM, Kramer J, Weingartner O, Uhlich F, Luft FC, Waigand J, et al. Determination of renal arterial stenosis severity: comparison of pressure gradient and vessel diameter. Radiology 2001;220:751-6.
8. Kohler TR, Zierler RE, Martin RL, Nicholls SC, Bergelin RO, Kazmers A, et al. Noninvasive diagnosis of renal artery stenosis by ultrasonic duplex scanning. J Vase Surg 1986;4:450-6.
9. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33: 159-74.
10. Leiboff R, Bren G, Katz R, Korkegi R, Ross A. Determinants of transstenotic gradients observed during angioplasty: an experimental model. Am J Cardiol 1983;52:1311-17.
11. Martin LG, Rundback JH, Sacks D, Cardella JF, Rees CR, Matsumoto AH, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for angiography, angioplasty, and stent placement in the diagnosis and treatment of renal artery stenosis in adults. J Vase Interv Radiol 2002;13:1069-83.
12. May AG, Van De Berg L, Deweese JA, Rob CG. Critical arterial stenosis. Surgery 1963;54:250-9.
13. Petrie A, Sabin C. Medical statistics at a glance. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 2000.
14. Rundback JH, Sacks D, Kent KC, Cooper C, Jones D, Murphy T, et al. Guidelines for the reporting of renal artery revascularization in clinical trials. Am Heart Assoc Circ 2002;106:1572-85.
15. Schoenberg SO, Knopp MV, Londy F, Krishnan S, Zuna T, Lang N, et al. Morphologic and functional magnetic resonance imaging of renal artery stenosis: a multireader tricenter study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002;13:158-69.
16. Sumner D. Essential hemodynamic principles. In: Rutherford RB, editor. Essential hemodynamic principles. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 2000:73-120.
17. Tan KT, van Beek EJ, Brown PW, van Delden OM, Tijssen J, Ramsay LE. Magnetic resonance angiography for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: a meta-analysis. Clin Radiol 2002;57:617-24.
18. Udoff EJ, Barth KH, Harrington DP, Kaufman SL, White RI. Hemodynamic significance of iliac artery stenosis: pressure measurements during angiography. Radiology 1979;132:289-93.
19. Vasbinder GB, Nelemans PJ, Kessels AG, Kroon AA, de Leeuw PW, van Engelshoven JM. Diagnostic tests for renal artery stenosis in patients suspected of having renovascular hypertension: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2001;135:401-11.
20. Wasser MN, Westenberg J, van der Hulst VP, van Baalen J, van Bockel JH, van Erkel AR, et al. Hemodynamic significance of renal artery stenosis: digital subtraction angiography versus systolically gated three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography. Radiology 1997;202:333-8.