Inclusion in physical education: From the medical model to social constructionism

Quest

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 298-310

  Grenier, Michelle ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548348163     PISSN: 00336297     EISSN: 15432750     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00336297.2007.10483554     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Adapted physical education national standards. (1995). Kelly, L. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
2. Addelson, K. (1983). The man of professional wisdom. In S. Harding & M.B. Hintikka (Eds.), Discovering reality (pp. 165-186). Boston: Reidel.
3. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA:Addison-Wesley.
4. Asch, A., & Fine, M. (1988). Introduction: Beyond pedestals. In M. Fine and A. Asch. (Eds.), Women with disabilities: Essays in psychology, culture, and politics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
5. Azzarito, L., & Solmon, M. (2006). A feminist poststructuralist view on student bodies in physical education: Sites of compliance, resistance, and transformation. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 25, 200-205.
6. Beyer, L. (Ed.). (1996). Creating democratic classrooms: The struggle to integrate theory and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
7. Biklen, D. (2000). Constructing inclusion: Lessons from critical disability narratives. Inclusive Education, 4, 337-353.
8. Biklen, D. (2005). Myth of the person alone. New York: New York University Press.
9. Biklen, D., & Duchan, J. (1994). I am intelligent: The social construction of mental retardation. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19. 173-184.
10. Biklen, D., & Kliewer, C. (2006). Constructing competence: autism, voice and the disordered body. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 10. 169-188.
11. Bleeker, H., & Mulderij, K. (1992). The experience of motor disability. Plienomonology & Pedagogy, 10, 1-17.
12. Blinde, M.E., & McCallister, S.G. (1998). Listening to the voices of students with disabilities. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance, 69, 64-68.
13. Block, M.E., & Krebs, PL. (1992). An alternative to the least restrictive environment: A continuum of support to regular physical education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 9, 97-113.
14. Block, M.E., & Rizzo. T.L. (1995). Attitudes and attributes of physical education teachers towards including students with severe and profound disabilities into regular physical education. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 20, 80-87.
15. Block, M.E., & Vogler, E. (1994). Inclusion in regular physical education: The research base. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 65. 40-44.
16. Bogdan, R.C., & Biklen, S.K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
17. Bowker, G.C., & Leigh Star, S. (2000). Invisible mediators of action: Classification and the ubiquity of standards. Mind, Culture and Activity-, 71, 147-163.
18. Brown, D., & Evans, J. (2004). Reproducing gender? Intergenerational links and the male PE teacher as a cultural conduit in teaching. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 23, 48-70.
19. Burton, A.W., & Davis, W.E. (1996). Ecological task analysis: Theoretical and empirical foundations. Human Movement Science, 15, 285-313.
20. Connelly, M. (1995). Phenomenology, physical education, and special populations. Human Studies, 18. 25-40.
21. Corker, M., & Shakespeare, T. (2004). Disability/postmodernity: Embodying disability- theory. (Eds.), London: Continuum.
22. Danforth, S., & Rhodes, W.C. (1997). Deconstructing disability. Remedial & Special Education, 18, 357-367.
23. Davis, L.J. (1997). Constructing normalcy. The disabilities studies reader. New York: Routledge.
24. DePauw, K., & Goc-Karp, G. (1990). Attitudes of selected college students toward including disabled individuals in integrated settings. In G. Doll-Tepper. C. Dahms, B. Doll. & H von Selzam (Eds.). Adapted physical activity’: An interdisciplinary’ approach (pp. 149-157). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
25. Dilts, S. (2001). Models of the mind: A framework for biopsychosocial psychiatry: London: Routledge.
26. Dunn, J.C., & Dunn, J.G. (2006). Psychosocial determinants of physical education behavior in children with movement difficulties. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 23. 293-309.
27. Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (2002). Discursive psychology. In A. McHoul & M. Rapley (Eds.). How to analyze talk in institutional settings: A casebook of methods. London: Continuum.
28. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977, ed. and trans. C. Gordon. New York: Pantheon.
29. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in etlmomethodology. New York: Prentice-Hall.
30. Gergen, K. (1994). Realities and relationships: Soundings in social construction. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
31. Gergen, K. (2000). An invitation to social construction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Gergen, K., Hoffman, L., & Anderson, H. (1996). Is diagnosis a disaster? A constructionist dialogue. In F. Kaslow (Ed.), Handbook for relational diagnosis. New York: Wiley.
33. Coffman, I. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity’. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
34. Goode, D. (1994). A world without words. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
35. Goodwin, D.L. (2001). The meaning of help in PE: Perceptions of students with physical disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 18, 144-160.
36. Goodwin, D.L., & Staples, K. (2005). The meaning of summer camp experiences to youth with disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity’ Quarterly, 22. 160-178.
37. Goodwin, D.L., Thurmeier, R., & Gustafson, P. (2004). Reactions to the metaphors of disability: The mediating effects of physical activity. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 21, 379-398.
38. Goodwin, D., & Watkinson, E. (2000). Inclusive physical education from the perspective of students with physical disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity’ Quarterly, 17, 144-160.
39. Grenier, M. (2006). A social constructionist perspective of teaching and learning in inclusive education. Adapted Physical Activity’ Quarterly, 23, 245-260.
40. Hahn, H. (1988). The politics of physical differences: Disability and discrimination. Journal of Social Issues, 44. 39-47.
41. Hodge, S.R., Ammah, J.O., Casebolt, K., LaMaster, K., & O’ Sullivan, M. (2004). High school general physical education teachers’ behaviors and beliefs associated with inclusion. Sport, Education & Society\ 9, 395-419.
42. Hodge, S.R., & Jansma, P. (1997). Attitude change of physical education majors toward teaching students with varied disability types. Clinical Kinesiology, 51, 72-79.
43. Imrie, R. (2004). Demystifying disability: a review of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Sociology of Health & Illness, 20. 287-305.
44. Jones, S. (1996). Toward inclusive theory: Disability as social construction. NASPA Journal, 33, 347-355.
45. Kowalski, E.M., & Rizzo, T.L. (1996). Factors influencing preservice student attitudes toward individuals with disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity' Quarterly, 13, 180-196.
46. Kozub, F., & Lienert, C. (2003). Attitudes toward teaching children with disabilities: Review of literature and research paradigm. Adapted Physical Activity’ Quarterly, 20. 323-346.
47. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. London: University of London Press.
48. LaMaster, K., Gall, K., Kinchin, G., & Siedentop, D. (1998). Inclusion practices of effective elementary specialists. Adapted Physical Activity! Quarterly, 15. 64-81.
49. Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy witli/ln the postmodern. New York: Routledge.
50. Lienert, C., Sherrill. C., & Myers, B. (2001). Physical educators’ concerns about integrating children with disabilities: A cross-cultural comparison. Adapted Physical Activity’ Quarterly, 18. 1-17.
51. Linton, S. (1998). Claiming disability: New York: New York University Press.
52. Lusted, D. (1986). Why pedagogy? Screen, 27, 2-14.
53. Marks, D. (1999). Disability: Controversial debates and psychosocial perspectives. London: Routledge.
54. McBryde Johnson, H. (2003, February 16). Unspeakable conversations. The New York Times.
55. Minner, S.H., & Knutson, R. (1982). Mainstreaming handicapped students into physical education: initial considerations. The Physical Educator, 39, 13-15.
56. Oliver, K.L., & Lalik, R. (2004). Cultural inquiry on the body in girls’ physical education classes: A critical post-structural perspective. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 23, 162-195.
57. Pfeiffer, D. (2000). The devils are in the details: The ICIDH2 and the disability movement. Disability’ and Society, 15. 1079-1082.
58. Rapley, M. 2004. The social construction of intellectual disability: Cambridge. UK: Cambridge University Press.
59. Rizzo, T.L. (1984). Attitudes of physical educators towards teaching handicapped pupils. Adapted Physical Activity’ Quarterly, 1, 267-274.
60. Rizzo, T.L., & Kirkendall, D.R. (1995). Teaching students with mild disabilities: What affects attitudes of future physical educators? Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 12. 205-216.
61. Rizzo, T. L. & Vispoel, W. P. (1992). Changing attitudes about teaching studentwith handicaps. Adapted Physical Activity’ Quarterly. 9. 54-63.
62. Rizzo, T.L., & Vispoel, W. (1991). Physical educators' attributes and attitudes towards teaching students with handicaps. Adapted Physical Activity’ Quarterly, 8, 4-11.
63. Sherrill, C. (2004). Adapted physical activity, recreation and sport: Crossdisciplinary and lifespan. 5th ed. (Dubuque, IA: McGraw-Hill).
64. Shotter, J. (2000). Concepts and transformation. International Journal of Action Research and Organizational Renewal, 5, 349-362.
65. Tripp, A., & Rizzo, T. (2006). Disability labels affect physical educators. Adapted Physical Activity’ Quarterly: 23. 310-326.
66. Tripp, A., & Sherrill, C. (1991). Attitude theories of relevance to adapted physical education. Adapted Physical Activity’ Quarterly, 8. 12-27.
67. Sampson, E.E. (1993). Celebrating the other. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
68. Shapiro, D.L., & Ulrich, D.A. (2001). Social comparisons of children with and without learning disabilities when evaluating physical competence. Adapted Physical Activity’ Quarterly, 18. 273-288.
69. Shogan, D. (1998). The social construction of disability: The impact of statistics and technology. Adapted Physical Activity’ Quarterly, 15. 269-277.
70. Soodak, L., Podell, D., & Lehman, L. (1998). Teacher, student, and school attributes as predictors of teachers’ responses to inclusion. The Journal of Special Education, 31, 480-497.
71. Stainback, S., & Stainback, S. (Eds.). (1990). Support networks for inclusive schooling: interdependent integrated education. Baltimore: Brookes.
72. Wendell, S. (1996). The rejected body. New York: Routledge.