Teachers' conceptions of learning philosophies: Discussing context and contextualising discussion

Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 183-200

  Brown, Tony ^a   Hanley, Una ^a   Darby, Susan ^a   Calder, Nigel ^b  

^a MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Context; Discussion; Ideology; Teacher development

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548182060     PISSN: 13864416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10857-007-9035-y     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. Lenin and philosophy and other essays. Trans. B. Brewster. London: New Left Books.
2. Bell, A. (1993). Some experiments in diagnostic teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(1), 115-137.
3. Blanton, M., Westbrook, S., & Carter, G. (2005). Using Valsiner's zone theory to interpret teaching practices in mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(1), 5-33.
4. Brown, M., Askew, M., Millett, A., & Rhodes, V. (2003). The key role of educational research in the development and evaluation of the National Numeracy Strategy. British Educational Research Journal, 29(5), 655-667.
5. Brown, M., Millett, A., Bibby, T., & Johnson, J. (2000). Turning our attention from the what to the how: The National Numeracy Strategy. British Educational Research Journal, 26(4), 457-472.
6. Brown, T. (2001). Mathematics education and language: Interpreting hermeneutics and post-structuralism, (Revised second edition). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
7. Brown, T., Devine, N., Leslie, E., Paiti, M., Sila'ila'i, E., Umaki, S., & Williams, J. (2007). Reflective engagement in cultural history: A Lacanian perspective on Pasifika teachers in New Zealand. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 15(1), 107-118.
8. Brown, T., Atkinson, D., & England, J. (2006). Regulative discourses in education: A Lacanian perspective. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
9. Brown, T., & McNamara, O. (2005). New teacher identity and regulative government: The discursive formation of mathematics teacher education. New York: Springer 2005.
10. Burns, C., & Myhill, D. (2004). Interactive or inactive? A consideration of the nature of interaction in whole class teaching. Cambridge Journal of Education, 34(1), 35-49.
11. Cohen, D. (1990). A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 327-345.
12. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press.
13. Department for Education, Employment: Standards, Effectiveness Unit (2001). Key Stage 3 National Strategy. Framework for teaching mathematics: Years 7, 8 and 9. London: Department for Education and Employment.
14. Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and difference. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
15. Fennema, E., & Nelson, B. (Eds.) (1997). Mathematics teachers in transition. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
16. Foucault, M. (1989). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Routledge.
17. Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education: China lectures. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
18. Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change. 3rd edition. New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Galton, M. (2002). A National Curriculum balance sheet. Education Review, 15(2), 15-21.
20. Goos, M. (2005). A sociocultural analysis of the development of pre-service and beginning teachers' pedagogical identities as users of technology. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(1), 35- 59.
21. Gravemeijer, K. (1994). Developing realistic mathematics education. Utrecht: CD-βPress/Freudenthal Institute.
22. Hammersley, M. (1997). Some questions about evidence-based practice in education. Paper presented at the symposium on "Evidence-based practice in education" at the annual conference of the British Educational Research Association.
23. Handal, B., & Herrington, A. (2003). Mathematics teachers' beliefs and curriculum reform. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15(1), 59-69.
24. Hargreaves, D. (1996). Teaching as a research-based profession; possibilities and prospects. The Teacher Training Agency lecture 1996. London: Teachers Training Agency.
25. Harrington, A. (1998). Whole class interactive teaching in mathematics. London: Teacher Training Agency.
26. Harris, S., Keys, W., & Fernandes, C. (1997). Third international mathematics and science study: Second national report part 1. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.
27. Hickey, D., Allison, A., & Pellegrino, J. (2001). The motivational and academic consequences of elementary mathematics environments: Do constructivist innovations and reforms make a difference? American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 611-652.
28. 2). Initial outcome of a nation-wide initiative for upper secondary schools in Austria. Mathematics Education Review, 16(April 2003), 49-60.
29. Kynigos, C., & Argyris, M. (2004). Teacher beliefs and practices formed during an innovation with computer-based exploratory mathematics in the classroom. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 10(3), 247-273.
30. Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. London: Verso.
31. Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2001). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.
32. de Lange, J. (1996). Using and applying mathematics in education. In A. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde. (Eds.). International handbook of mathematics education, Part one (pp. 49-97). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
33. Lather, P. (2003). Applied Derrida: (Mis) reading the work of mourning in educational research, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 35(3) 257-270.
34. Lerman, S. (2000). A case of interpretations of 'social': A response to Steffe & Thompson. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(2), 210-227.
35. Levi Strauss, C. (1989). The savage mind. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
36. Lloyd, G. M. (1999). Two teachers' conceptions of a reform-oriented curriculum: Implications for mathematics teacher development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2(3), 227-252.
37. Mouffe, M. (2005). On the political. London: Routledge.
38. Ng, S., Lopez-Real, F., & Rao, N. (2003). Early mathematics teaching: The relationship between teachers' beliefs and classroom practices, Proceedings of the 2003 joint meeting of PME and PMENA, vol. 3. Honolulu, USA: University of Hawaii.
39. Piaget, J. (1971). Structuralism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
40. Rancière, J. (2004). The politics of aesthetics. London: Continuum.
41. Remillard, J. (2000). Can curriculum materials support teachers' learning? Elementary School Journal, 11(4), 331-350.
42. Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211-246.
43. Remillard, J., & Bryans, M. (2004). Teachers' orientations towards mathematics curriculum materials: Implications for teacher learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 352-388.
44. Remillard, J. T., & Geist, P. K. (2002). Supporting teachers' professional learning by navigating openings in the curriculum. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5(1), 7-34.
45. Romberg, T. (1997). Mathematics in context: Impact on teachers. In E. Fennema, & B. Scott Nelson (Eds.) Mathematics teachers in transition. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
46. Sahin, C., Bullock, K., & Stables, A. (2002). Teachers' beliefs and practices in relation to their beliefs about questioning at Key Stage 2. Educational Studies, 28(4), 371-384.
47. de Saussure, F. (1966). A course in general linguistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
48. Schön, D. (2003). The reflective practitioner. London: Ashgate.
49. Senger, E. (1999). Reflective reform in mathematics: The recursive nature of teacher change. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37(3), 199-221.
50. Simon, M., & Tzur, R. (1999). Explicating the teacher's perspective from the researchers' perspectives: Generating accounts of mathematics teachers' practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(3), 252-264.
51. Skott, J. (2001). The emerging practices of a novice teacher: The roles of his school mathematics images. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4, 3-28.
52. Steffe, L., & Kieran, T. (1994). Radical constructivism and mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(6), 711-733.
53. Swan, M. (2000). GSCE mathematics in further education: Challenging beliefs and practices. The Curriculum Journal, 11(2), 199-223.
54. Sztajn, P. (2003). Adapting reform ideas in different mathematics classrooms: Beliefs beyond mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6(1), 53-75.
55. Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (2001). Developing formative assessment in the classroom: Using action research to explore and modify theory. British Educational Research Journal, 27(5), 615-631.
56. Tzur, R., Simon, M., Heinz, K., & Kinzel, M. (2001). An account of a teacher's perspective on learning and teaching mathematics: Implications for teacher development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4(3), 227-254.
57. Van Zoest, L. R., & Bohl, J. V. (2002). The role of reform curricular materials in an internship: The case of Alice and Gregory. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5, 265-288.
58. Walkerdine, V. (1984) Developmental psychology and the child-centered pedagogy. In J. Henriques, W. Holloway, C. Urwin, C. Venn, & V. Walkerdine (Eds.) Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity. London: Methuen.
59. Wilson, S. M., & Goldenberg, P. (1998). Some conceptions are difficult to change: One middle school mathematics teachers' struggle. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1, 269-293.
60. Žižek, S. (2006). The parallax view. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.