DETERMINING THE QUALITY OF COMPETENCE ASSESSMENT PROGRAMS: A SELF-EVALUATION PROCEDURE

Studies in Educational Evaluation

Volumn 33, Issue 3-4, 2007, Pages 258-281

  Baartman, Liesbeth K J ^a,b   Prins, Frans J ^a   Kirschner, Paul A ^a,b   van der Vleuten, Cees P M ^c  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

^c MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548042072     PISSN: 0191491X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2007.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Alderson J.C., and Wall D. Does washback exist?. Applied Linguistics 14 (1993) 115-129
2. Baartman L.K.J., Bastiaens T.J., Kirschner P.A., and Van der Vleuten C.P.M. The wheel of competency assessment. Presenting quality criteria for Competency Assessment Programs. Studies in Educational Evaluation 32 (2006) 153-177
3. Baartman et al., Baartman, L.K.J., Bastiaens, T.J., Kirschner, P.A., & Van der Vleuten, C.P.M. (in press). Teachers' opinions on quality criteria for Competency Assessment Programmes. Teaching and Teacher Education, in press.
4. Baume D., Yorke M., and Coffey M. What is happening when we assess, and how can we use our understanding of this to improve assessment?. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 29 (2004) 451-477
5. Benett Y. The validity and reliability of assessments and self-assessments of work-based learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 18 (1993) 83-95
6. Birenbaum, M. (1996). Assessment 2000: Towards a pluralistic approach to assessment. In M. Birenbaum & F.J.R.C. Dochy (Eds.), Alternatives in assessment of achievement, learning processes and prior knowledge (pp. 3-29). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
7. Birenbaum, M., Breuer, K., Cascallar, E., Dochy, F., Dori, Y., Ridgway, J., & Wiesemes, R. (2006). Position paper. A learning integrated assessment system. Educational Research Review, 1, 61-67.
8. Black P., and Wiliam D. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 5 (1998) 7-75
9. Chester M.D. Multiple measures and high-stakes decisions: A framework for combining measures. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 22 (2003) 32-41
10. Clark, D.B., & Sampson, V.D. (2005). Analyzing the quality of argumentation supported by personally-seeded discussions. In T. Koschman, T. Chan & D.D. Suthers (Eds.), Computer-supported collaborative learning 2005: The next 10 years! (pp. 76-85). Taipei, Taiwan: Erlbaum.
11. Dierick S., and Dochy F.J.R.C. New lines in edumetrics: new forms of assessment lead to new assessment criteria. Studies in Educational Evaluation 27 (2001) 307-329
12. Dochy, F., Gijbels, D., & Van de Watering, G. (2004, June). Assessment engineering: Aligning assessment, learning and instruction. Keynote lecture, EARLI-Northumbria Assessment Conference, Bergen, Norway.
13. Dochy F.J.R.C., and McDowell L. Introduction: Assessment as a tool for learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation 23 (1997) 279-298
14. Gibbs, G. (1999). Using assessment strategically to change the way students learn. In S. Brown & A. Glaser (Eds.), Assessment matters in higher education (pp. 41-53). Buckingham: SRHE.
15. Glaser R., and Silver E. Assessment, testing and instruction: Retrospect and prospect. Review of Research in Education 20 (1994) 393-419
16. Gulikers J.T.M., Bastiaens T.J., and Kirschner P.A. A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educational Technology Research & Design 52 (2004) 67-87
17. Hambleton R.K., and Murphy E. A psychometric perspective on authentic measurement. Applied Measurement in Education 5 (1992) 1-16
18. Hickey D.T., Zuiker S.J., Taasoobshirazi G., Schafer N.J., and Michael M.A. Balancing varied assessment functions to attain systemic validity: Three is the magic number. Studies in Educational Evaluation 32 (2006) 180-201
19. Jonsson, A., & Baartman, L.K.J. (2006, August). Estimating the quality of new modes of assessment: The case of an "Interactive Examination" for Teacher Competency. Paper presented at the 3rd biennial EARLI SIG Assessment Conference. Northumbria, United Kingdom.
20. Kane M.T. An argument-based approach to validity. Psychological Bulletin 112 (1992) 527-535
21. Kane M.T. Certification testing as an illustration of argument-based validation. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives 2 (2004) 135-170
22. Knight P.T. The value of a programme-wide approach to assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 25 (2000) 237-251
23. Kuhn, D. (1994). The skills of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24. Kyriakides L., and Campbell R.J. School self-evaluation and school improvement: A critique of values and procedures. Studies in Educational Evaluation 30 (2004) 23-36
25. Linn R.L., Baker J., and Dunbar S.B. Complex, performance-based assessment: Expectations and validation criteria. Educational Researcher 20 (1991) 15-21
26. Lizzio A., and Wilson K. Action learning in higher education: An investigation of its potential to develop professional capability. Studies in Higher Education 29 (2004) 469-488
27. Maclellan E. Initial knowledge states about assessment: novice teachers' conceptualisations. Teaching and Teacher Education 20 (2004) 523-535
28. McNamara G., and O'Hara J. Internal review and self-evaluation - The chosen route to school improvement in Ireland?. Studies in Educational Evaluation 31 (2005) 267-282
29. Messick S. The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher 23 (1994) 13-23
30. Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis. A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
31. Miller M.D., and Linn R.L. Validation of performance-based assessments. Applied Psychological Measurement 24 (2000) 367-378
32. Moss P.M. Can there be validity without reliability?. Educational Research 23 (1994) 5-12
33. Nevo D. Combing internal and external evaluation: A case for school-based evaluation. Studies in Educational Evaluation 20 (1994) 87-98
34. Nevo D. School evaluation: Internal or external?. Studies in Educational Evaluation 27 (2001) 95-106
35. Scheerens J., Van Amelsvoort H.W.C.G., and Donoghue C. Aspects of the organizational and political context of school evaluation in four European countries. Studies in Educational Evaluation 25 (1999) 79-108
36. Schuwirth L.W.T., and Van der Vleuten C.P.M. Changing education, changing assessment, changing research?. Medical Education 38 (2004) 805-812
37. Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Simon S., Erduran S., and Osborne J. Learning to teach argumentation: research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education 28 (2006) 235-260
39. Stokking K., Van der Schaaf M., Jaspers J., and Erkens G. Teachers' assessment of students' research skills. British Educational Research Journal 30 (2004) 93-116
40. Tillema H.H., Kessels J.W.M., and Meijers F. Competencies as building blocks for integrating assessment with instruction in vocational education: A case from the Netherlands. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 25 (2000) 265-278
41. Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42. Valli L., and Rennert-Ariev P. New standards and assessments? Curriculum transformation in teacher education. Journal of Curriculum Studies 34 (2002) 201-225
43. Van der Vleuten C.P.M., and Schuwirth L.W.T. Assessing professional competence: From methods to programmes. Medical Education 39 (2005) 309-317