School evaluation: Internal or external?

Studies in Educational Evaluation

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 95-106

  Nevo, David ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035644114     PISSN: 0191491X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0191-491X(01)00016-5     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Cousins, J.B., & Whitmore, E. (1998). Framing participatory evaluation. In E. Whitmore (Ed.), Understanding and Practicing Participatory Evaluation: New Directions for Evaluation, 80, 2-23.
2. Cousins, J.B., & Leithwood, K.A. (1986). Current empirical research on evaluation utilization. Review of Educational Research, 56 (3), 331-364.
3. th Ed.) (pp. 1359-1366). New York: Macmillan.
4. Fetterman, D., Kaftarian, S.J., & Wandersman, A. (Eds.). (1996). Empowerment Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Glasman, N.S., & Nevo, D. (1988). Evaluation in Decision Making: The Case of School Administration. Boston: Kluwer.
6. Love, A.J. (1991). Internal Evaluation: Building Organizations from Within. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7. Mathison, S. (1991). What do we know about internal evaluation? Evaluation and Program Planning, 14, 159-165.
8. Nevo, D. (1995). School-based Evaluation: A Dialogue for School Improvement. Oxford: Pergamon.
9. Nevo, D. (1997). The function of evaluation in school autonomy. In R. Shapira & P.W. Cookson (Eds.), Autonomy and Choice in Context: International Perspectives. Oxford: Pergamon.
10. Nevo, D., & Friedman, E. (1999). The common and the diverse: Evaluation of multi-dimensional projects. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction. Gothenburg, Sweden, August 24-28, 1999
11. rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Schon, D.A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
13. Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R.E. Stake (Ed.), AERA Monograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation No. 1. Chicago: Rand McNally.
14. th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Scriven, M. (1995). The logic of evaluation and evaluation practice. In D.M. Founier (Ed.), Reasoning in Evaluation: Inferential Links and Leaps (New Directions for Program Evaluation, No. 68). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16. Shulha, L.M., & Cousins, J.B. (1997). Evaluation use: Theory, research and practice since 1986. Evaluation Practice, 18 (3), 195-208.
17. Sonnichsen, R. C. (2000). High Impact Internal Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Stake, R. et al., (1997). The evolving synthesis of program value. Evaluation Practice, 18 (2), 89-103.
19. Stufflebeam, D.L., Foley, W.J., Gephart, W.J., Guba, E.G., Hammond, R.L., Merriman, H.O., & Provus, M.M. (1971). Educational Evaluation and Decision-making. Itasca IL: Peacock.
20. Wilson, T.A. (1996). Reaching for Better Standards. New York: Teachers College Press.