System and control theory furthers the understanding of biological signal transduction

Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences

Volumn 357, Issue , 2007, Pages 123-135

  Bullinger, Eric ^a   Findeisen, Rolf ^b   Kalamatianos, Dimitrios ^a   Wellstead, Peter ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS; BIOLOGY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

FUTURE CHALLENGES; MODELLING AND ANALYSIS; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

CONTROL THEORY;

EID: 34547844251     PISSN: 01708643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-71988-5_6     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. A. Agrawal. New institute to study systems biology. Nat Biotechnol, 17(8):743-744, 1999.
2. S. Audoly, G. Bellu, L. D'Angi'o, M. P. Saccomani, and C. Cobelli. Global identifiability of nonlinear models of biological systems. IEEE T Bio-med Eng, 48(1):55-65, 2001.
3. Biomodels database, www.biomodels.net.
4. J. M. Carlson and J. Doyle. Complexity and robustness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 99(Suppl 1):2538-2545, 2002.
5. M. Cascante, L. G. Boros, B. Comin-Anduix, P. de Atauri, J. J. Centelles, and P. W.-N. Lee. Metabolic Control Analysis in drug discovery and disease. Nat Biotechnol, 20(3):243-249, Mar. 2002.
6. cellML model repository, www.cellml.org/examples/repository/.
7. K.-H. Cho and O. Wolkenhauer. Analysis and modelling of signal transduction pathways in systems biology. Biochem Soc T, 31(6):1503-1509, 2003.
8. A. Citri and Y. Yarden. EGF-ERBB signalling: Towards the systems level. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 7(7):505-516, 2006.
9. C. Conradi, J. Saez-Rodriguez, E.-D. Gilles, and J. Raisch. Using chemical reaction network theory to d a kinetic mechanism hypothesis. IEE Proc Syst Biol, 152(4):243-248, 2005.
10. A. Cornish-Bowden. Fundamentals of Enzyme Kinetics. Portland Press, 3rd edition, 2004.
11. E. J. Crampin, S. Schnell, and P. E. McSharry. Mathematical and computational techniques to deduce complex biochemical reaction, mechanisms. Prog Biophys Mol Biol, 86(1):77-112, 2004.
12. M. E. Csete and J.C.Doyle. Reverse engineering of biological complexity. Science, 295(5560): 1664-1669, 2002.
13. P. Dorato. Non-fragile controller design: an overview. In Proc. of the 1998 American Control Conf, pages 2829-2831, 1998.
14. T. Eißing, F. Allgöwer, and E. Bullinger. Robustness properties of apoptosis models with respect to parameter variations and intrinsic noise. IEE Proc Syst Biol, 152(4):221-228, 2005.
15. T. Eißing, S. Waldherr, F. Allgöwer, P. Scheurich, and E. Bullinger. Response to bistability in apoptosis: Roles of Bax, Bcl-2, and mitochondrial permeability transition pores. Biophys. J., 2007. In press.
16. H. El-Samad, H. Kurata, J. C. Doyle, C. A. Gross, and M. Khammash. Surviving heat shock: control strategies for robustness and performance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 102(8):2736-2741, 2005.
17. H. El-Samad, H. Kurata, J.C.Doyle,C. A. Gross, and M. Khammash. Surviving heat shock: Control strategies for robustness and performance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 102(8):2736-2741, 2005.
18. M. Farina, R. Findeisen, E. Bullinger, S. Bittanti, F. Allgöwer, and P. Wellstead. Results towards identifiability properties of biochemical reaction networks. In Proc. of the 45th IEEE Conf on Decision and Control, San Diego, USA, pages 2104-2109, 2006.
19. D. A. Fell. Increasing the flux in metabolic pathways: A Metabolic Control Analysis perspective. Biotechnol Bioeng, 58(2-3): 121-124, 1998.
20. X.-J. Feng, S. Hooshangi, D. Chen, G. Li, R. Weiss, and H. Rabitz. Optimizing genetic circuits by global sensitivity analysis. Biophys J, 87(4):2195-2202, 2004.
21. H. Garnier, M. Mensler, and A. Richard. Continuous-time model identification from sampled data implementation issues and performance evaluation. Int J Control, 76(13):1337-1357, 2003.
22. K. Gatermann and B. Huber. A family of sparse polynomial systems arising in chemical reaction systems. J Symb Comput, 33:275-305, 2002.
23. P. Gray, W. Hart, L. Painton, C. Phillips, M. Trahan, and J. Wagner. A survey of global optimization methods. Technical report, Sandia National Laboratories, 1997.
24. R. Heinrich and T. A. Rapoport. A linear steady state treatment of enzymatic chains, general properties, control and effector strength. European J of Biochemistry, 42:89-95, 1974.
25. A. L. Hodgkin and A. F. Huxley. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application, to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol., 117(4):500-544, 1952.
26. A. Hoffmann, A. Levchenko, M. L. Scott, and D. Baltimore. The IκB-NF-κB signaling module: temporal control and selective gene activation. Science, 298:1241-1245, 2002.
27. T. Ideker, T. Galitski, and L. Hood. A new approach to decoding life: Systems biology. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet, 2:343-372, 2001.
28. B. P. Ingalls and H. M. Sauro. Sensitivity analysis of stoichiometric networks: an extension of metabolic control analysis to non-steady state trajectories. J Theor Biol, 222(1):23-36, 2003.
29. JWS Online, jjj.biochem.sun.ac.za.
30. H. Kacser and J. A. Burns. The control of flux. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology, 27:65-104, 1973.
31. A. V. Karnaukhov and E. V. Karnaukhova. Application of a new method of nonlinear dynamical system identification to biochemical problems. Biochemistry (Moscow), 68(3):253-259, 2003. Translated from Biokhimiya, Vol. 68, No. 3, 2003, pp. 309-317.
32. J. Keener and J. Sneyd. Mathematical Physiology, volume 8 of Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, second edition, 2001.
33. B. N. Kholodenko. Cell-signalling dynamics in time and space. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 7:165-176, 2006.
34. J. Kim, D. Bates, I. Postlethwaite, L. Ma, and P. Iglesias. Robustness analysis of biochemical network models. IEE Proc Syst Biol, 153(3):96-104, 2006.
35. H. Kitano. Perspectives on systems biology. New Generation Computing, 18(3):199-216, 2000.
36. H. Kitano. Preface. In H. Kitano, editor, Foundations of Systems Biology, pages xiii-xv. MIT Press, Cambridge/MA, 2001.
37. H. Kitano. Systems biology: a brief overview. Science, 295(5560):1662-1664, 2002.
38. H. Kitano. Systems biology: A brief overview. Science, 295:1662-1664, 2002.
39. H. Kitano. Biological robustness. Nat Rev Genet, 5:826-837, 2004.
40. H. Kitano. International alliances for quantitative modeling in systems biology. Mol Syst Biol, 1:2005.0007, 2005.
41. H. Kitano. Robustness from top to bottom. Nat Genet, 38(2):133-133, 2006.
42. E. Klipp, B. Nordlander, R. Krüger, P. Gennemark, and S. Hohmann. Integrative model of the response of yeast to osmotic shock. Nat Biotechnol, 23(8):975-982, 2005.
43. M. Koffas and G. Stephanopoulos. Strain improvement by metabolic engineering: Lysine production as a case study for systems biology. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 16(3):361-366, 2005.
44. M. Kollmann, L. Lovdok, K. Bartholomé, J. Timmer, and V. Sourjik. Design principles of a bacterial signalling network. Nature, 438(7067):504-507, 2005.
45. H. Kurata, H. El-Samad, R. Iwasaki, H. Olitake, J. C. Doyle, I. Grigorova, C. A. Gross, and M. Khammash. Module-based analysis of robustness tradeoffs in the heat shock response system. PLoS Comput Biol, 2(7):e59, 2006.
46. R. Legenstein, C. Naeger, and W. Maass. What can a neuron, learn with spiketiming-dependent plasticity? Neural Comput, 17(11):2337-2382, 2005.
47. A. Levchenko. Dynamical and integrative cell signaling: challenges for the new biology. Biotechnol Bioeng, 84(7):773-782, 2003.
48. L. Ljung. Bode lecture: Challenges of non-linear identification. In 39th IEEE Conf on Decision and Control, Maui, Hawaii, USA, 2003.
49. L. Ljung and T. Glad. On global identifiability for arbitrary model parametrization. Automatica, 30(2):265-276, 1994.
50. J. O. McInerney. Bioinformatics in a post-genomics world - the need for an inclusive approach. Pharmacogenomics J, 2(4):207-208, 2002.
51. M. D. Mesarovic, Systems theory and biology - view of a theoretician. In M. D. Mesarovic, editor, Systems Theory and Biology, pages 59-87. Springer Verlag, 1968.
52. T. Millat, E. Bullinger, J. Rohwer, and O. Wolkenhauer. Approximations and their consequences for dynamic modelling of signal transduction pathways. Math Bioscience, 2006. In press.
53. C. G. Moles, P. Mendes, and J. R. Banga. Parameter estimation in biochemical pathways: a comparison of global optimization methods. Genome Res, 13(11):2467-2474, 2003.
54. M. Morohashi, A. E. Winn, M. T. Borisuk, H. Bolouri, J. Doyle, and H. Kitano. Robustness as a measure of plausibility in models of biochemical networks. J Theor Biol, 216:19-30, 2002.
55. L. O. Murphy, S. Smith, R. H. Chen, D. C. Fingar, and J. Blenis. Molecular interpretation of ERK signal duration by immediate early gene products. Nature Cell Biol., 4:556-564, 2002.
56. R. D. O'Neill, J. P. Lowry, and M. Mas. Monitoring brain chemistry in vivo: Voltammetric techniques, sensors, and behavioral applications. Crit Rev Neurobiol, 12(1-2):69-127, 1998.
57. Physiome project models. www.physiome.org/Models/.
58. P. K. Polisetty, E. O. Voit, and E. P. Gatzke. Identification of metabolic system parameters using global optimization methods. Theor Biol Med Model, 3:4, 2006.
59. M. Rehm, H. Dussmann, R. U. Janicke, J. M., Tavare, D. Kogel, and J. H. M. Prehn. Single-cell fluorescence resonance energy transfer analysis demonstrates that caspase activation during apoptosis is a rapid process. role of caspase-3. J Biol Chem, 277(27):24506-24514, July 2002.
60. J. C. Schöning and D. Staiger. At the pulse of time: Protein interactions determine the pace of circadian clocks. FEBS Lett, 579(15):3246-3252, 2005.
61. E. Schrödinger. What is Life? The physical aspect of the living cell. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1944.
62. A. B. Singer, J. W. Taylor, P. I. Barton, and W. H. Green. Global dynamic optimization for parameter estimation in chemical kinetics. J Phys Chem A, 110(3):971-976, 2006.
63. P. Smolen, D. A. Baxter, and J. H. Byrne. Modeling circadian oscillations with interlocking positive and negative feedback loops. J Neurosci, 21(17):6644-6656, 2001.
64. E. Sontag. Some new directions in control theory inspired by systems biology. Syst Biol, 1(1):9-18, 2004.
65. E. Sontag. Molecular systems biology and control. European Journal of Control, 11:396-435, 2005.
66. E. D. Sontag. Molecular systems biology and control: A qualitative-quantitative approach. In Proc. of the 44th IEEE Conf on Decision and Control and European Control Conf, ECC'05, Seville, Spain, pages 2314-2319, 2005.
67. J. Stelling, E. Gilles, and F. J. Doyle, III. Robustness properties of circadian clock architectures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 101(36):13210-13205, 2004.
68. J. Stelling, U. Sauer, Z. Szallasi, F. J. Doyle, and J. Doyle. Robustness of cellular functions. Cell, 118(6):675-685, 2004.
69. J. Stelling, U. Sauer, Z. Szallasi, I. Francis J. Doyle, and J. Doyle. Robustness of cellular functions. Cell, 118:675-685, 2004.
70. S. Streif, R. Findeisen, and E. Bullinger. Relating cross Gramians and sensitivity analysis in systems biology. In Proc. of the 17th International Symposium on Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems, 24-28 July, Kyoto, Japan, pages 437-442, 2006.
71. K. V. Venkatesh, S. Bhartiya, and A. Ruhela. Multiple feedback loops are key to a robust dynamic performance of tryptophan regulation in escherichia coli. FEBS Lett, 563(1-3):234-240, 2004.
72. G. von Dassow, E. Meir, E. M. Munro, and G. M. Odell. The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module. Nature, 406(6792): 188-192, 2000.
73. R. Wang, Z. Jing, and L. Chen. Modelling periodic oscillation in gene regulatory networks by cyclic feedback systems. Bull Math Biol, 67(2):339-367, 2005.
74. O. Wolkenhauer. Systems biology: the reincarnation of systems theory applied in biology? Brief Bioinform, 2(3):258-270, 2001.
75. O. Wolkenhauer. Systems biology: The reincarnation of systems theory applied in biology? Brief Bioinform, 2(3):258-270, 2001.
76. O. Wolkenhauer, S. N. Sreenath, P. Wellstead, M. Ullah, and K.-H. Cho. A systems- and signal-oriented approach to intracellular dynamics. Biochem Soc T, 33(Pt 3):507-515, 2005.
77. www.systems-biology.org.www.systems-biology.org/001/.
78. X. Xia and C. H. Moog. Identifiability of nonlinear systems with application to HIV/AIDS models. IEEE T Automat Contr, 48(2):330-336, 2003.
79. T.-M. Yi, Y. Huang, M. Simon, and J. Doyle. Robust perfect adaptation in bacterial Chemotaxis through integral feedback control. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 97(9):4649-4653, 2000.
80. D. E. Zak, G. E. Gonye, J. S. Schwaber, and F. J. Doyle III. Importance of input perturbations and stochastic gene expression in the reverse engineering of genetic-regulatory networks: Insights from an identifiability analysis of an in silico network. Genome Res, 13(11):2396-2405, 2003.