Detecting randomization restrictions caused by factors

Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 129-140

  Ganju, Jitendra ^a   Lucas, James M ^b  

^a ROCHE BIOSCIENCE   (United States)

^b J M Lucas and Associates   (United States)

Author keywords

62K15; Inadvertent split plotting; Independent resetting of factor levels; Inherent split plotting; Random run order versus complete randomization

Indexed keywords

EID: 0012966593     PISSN: 03783758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3758(99)00002-6     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Box, G.E.P., Hunter, W.G., Hunter, J.S., 1978. Statistics for Experimenters. Wiley, New York.
2. Draper, N.R., Smith, H., 1981. Applied Regression Analysis. Wiley, New York.
3. Filliben J.J. The probability plot correlation test for normality. Technometrics. 17:1975;111-117.
4. Ganju, J., 1994. Diagnostics for inherent split-plotting in designed experiments. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Delaware.
5. Ganju J., Lucas J.M. Bias in test statistics when restrictions in randomization are caused by factors. Commun. Statist. Theory Meth. 26:1997;47-63.
6. Ganju, J., Lucas, J.M., 1998. The inappropriateness of significance tests under random run order experiments. Amer. Statist., submitted for publication.
7. Johnson, R.A., Wichern, D.W., 1988. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
8. Joiner B.L., Cambell C. Designing experiments when run order is important. Technometrics. 18:1976;249-259.
9. Mason, R.L., Gunst, R.F., Hess, J.L., 1989. Statistical Design and Analysis of Experiments with Applications to Engineering and Science. Wiley, New York.
10. Searle, S.R., 1971. Linear Models. Wiley, New York.
11. Wilf, H.S., 1990. Generatingfunctionolgy. Academic Press, New York.