Compound tests for the detection of hitchhiking under positive selection

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 24, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1898-1908

  Zeng, Kai ^a,c   Shi, Suhua ^a   Wu, Chung I ^b  

^a SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Background selection; Compound tests; Demography; Positive selection

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DEMOGRAPHY; GENETIC CONSERVATION; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETIC SELECTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; POPULATION GROWTH; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETICS, POPULATION; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SELECTION (GENETICS); SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 34547737972     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msm119     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Akey JM, Eberle MA, Rieder MJ, Carlson CS, Shriver MD, Nickerson DA, Kruglyak L. 2004. Population history and natural selection shape patterns of genetic variation in 132 genes. PLoS Biol. 2:e286.
2. Akey JM, Zhang G, Zhang K, Jin L, Shriver MD. 2002. Interrogating a high-density SNP map for signatures of natural selection. Genome Res. 12:1805-1814.
3. Andolfatto P, Przeworski M. 2001. Regions of lower crossing over harbor more rare variants in African populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 158:657-665.
4. Barton NH. 1998. The effect of hitch-hiking on neutral genealogies. Genet. Res. 72:123-133.
5. Baudry E, Depaulis F. 2003. Effect of misoriented sites on neutrality tests with outgroup. Genetics. 165:1619-1622.
6. Biswas S, Akey JM. 2006. Genomic insights into positive selection. Trends Genet. 22:437-446.
7. Braverman JM, Hudson RR, Kaplan NL, Langley CH, Stephan W. 1995. The hitchhiking effect on the site frequency spectrum of DNA polymorphisms. Genetics. 140:783-796.
8. Carlson CS, Thomas DJ, Eberle MA, Swanson JE, Livingston RJ, Rieder MJ, Nickerson DA. 2005. Genomic regions exhibiting positive selection identified from dense genotype data. Genome Res. 15:1553-1565.
9. Charlesworth B. 1996. Background selection and patterns of genetic diversity in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 68:131-149.
10. Charlesworth B, Morgan MT, Charlesworth D. 1993. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics. 134:1289-1303.
11. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B, Morgan MT. 1995. The pattern of neutral molecular variation under the background selection model. Genetics. 141:1619-1632.
12. Depaulis F, Mousset S, Veuille M. 2003. Power of neutrality tests to detect bottlenecks and hitchhiking. J Mol Evol. 57(Suppl. 1):S190-200.
13. Ewens WJ. 1972. The sampling theory of selectively neutral alleles. Theor Popul Biol. 3:87-112.
14. Ewens WJ. 2004. Mathematical population genetics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. pp. 188-191.
15. Fay JC, Wu C-I. 2000. Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection. Genetics. 155:1405-1413.
16. Fay JC, Wu C-I. 2003. Sequence divergence, functional constraint, and selection in protein evolution. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 4:213-235.
17. Fu Y-X. 1995. Statistical properties of segregating sites. Theor Popul Biol. 48:172-197.
18. Fu Y-X. 1997. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics. 147:915-925.
19. Gillespie JH. 1991. The cause of molecular evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Golding B. 1997. The effect of purifying selection on genealogies. In: Donnelly P, Tavaré S, editors. Progress in population genetics and human evolution. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. p. 271-285.
21. Hudson RR. 1983. Properties of a neutral allele model with intragenic recombination. Theor Popul Biol. 23:183-201.
22. Hudson RR. 1990. Gene genealogies and the coalescent process. In: Futuyma D, Antonovics J, editors. Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. p. 1-44.
23. Hudson RR. 1993. The how and why of generating gene genealogies. In: Takahata N, Clark AG, editors. Mechanisms of molecular evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer. p. 23-36.
24. Hudson RR. 2002. Generating samples under a Wright-Fisher neutral model of genetic variation. Bioinformatics. 18:337-338.
25. Hudson RR, Kaplan NL. 1994. Gene trees with background selection. In: Golding B, editor. Non-neutral evolution: theories and molecular data. London: Chapman & Hall. p. 140-153.
26. Hudson RR, Kaplan NL. 1995. Deleterious background selection with recombination. Genetics. 141:1605-1617.
27. Hudson RR, Kreitman M, Aguade M. 1987. A test of neutral molecular evolution based on nucleotide data. Genetics. 116:153-159.
28. Innan H. 2006. Modified Hudson-Kreitman-Aguade test and twodimensional evaluation of neutrality tests. Genetics. 173:1725-1733.
29. Jensen JD, Kim Y, DuMont VB, Aquadro CF, Bustamante CD. 2005. Distinguishing between selective sweeps and demography using DNA polymorphism data. Genetics. 170:1401-1410.
30. Karlin S, McGregor J. 1972. Addendum to a paper of W. Ewens. Theor Popul Biol. 3:113-116.
31. Kim Y, Nielsen R. 2004. Linkage disequilibrium as a signature of selective sweeps. Genetics. 167:1513-1524.
32. Kim Y, Stephan W. 2002. Detecting a local signature of genetic hitchhiking along a recombining chromosome. Genetics. 160:765-777.
33. Kimura M. 1969. The number of heterozygous nucleotide sites maintained in a finite population due to steady flux of mutations. Genetics. 61:893-903.
34. Kimura M. 1980. Average time until fixation of a mutant allele in a finite population under continued mutation pressure: Studies by analytical, numerical, and pseudo-sampling methods. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 77:522-526.
35. Kimura M. 1983. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Li H, Stephan W. 2006. Inferring the demographic history and rate of adaptive substitution in. Drosophila. PLoS Genet. 2:e166.
37. Maynard Smith J, Haigh J. 1974. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res. 23:23-35.
38. Nielsen R. 2005. Molecular signatures of natural selection. Annu Rev Genet. 39:197-218.
39. Nielsen R, Williamson S, Kim Y, Hubisz MJ, Clark AG, Bustamante C. 2005. Genomic scans for selective sweeps using SNP data. Genome Res. 15:1566-1575.
40. Przeworski M. 2002. The signature of positive selection at randomly chosen loci. Genetics. 160:1179-1189.
41. Przeworski M, Charlesworth B, Wall JD. 1999. Genealogies and weak purifying selection. Mol Biol Evol. 16:246-252.
42. Przeworski M, Wall JD, Andolfatto P. 2001. Recombination and the frequency spectrum in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Mol Biol Evol. 18:291-298.
43. Sabeti PC, Reich DE, Higgins JM, et al. 2002. Detecting recent positive selection in the human genome from haplotype structure. Nature. 419:832-837.
44. Sabeti PC, Schaffner SF, Fry B, Lohmueller J, Varilly P, Shamovsky O, Palma A, Mikkelsen TS, Altshuler D, Lander ES. 2006. Positive natural selection in the human lineage. Science. 312:1614-1620.
45. Simonsen KL, Churchill GA, Aquadro CF. 1995. Properties of statistical tests of neutrality for DNA polymorphism data. Genetics. 141:413-429.
46. Slatkin M. 1994. An exact test for neutrality based on the Ewens sampling distribution. Genet Res. 64:71-74.
47. Stephan W, Song YS, Langley CH. 2006. The hitchhiking effect on linkage disequilibrium between linked neutral loci. Genetics. 172:2647-2663.
48. Tajima F. 1983. Evolutionary relationship of DNA sequences in finite populations. Genetics. 105:437-460.
49. Tajima F. 1989. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 123:585-595.
50. Teshima KM, Coop G, Przeworski M. 2006. How reliable are empirical genomic scans for selective sweeps? Genome Res. 16:702-712.
51. Thornton K, Andolfatto P. 2006. Approximate Bayesian inference reveals evidence for a recent, severe bottleneck in a Netherlands population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 172:1607-1619.
52. Voight BF, Kudaravalli S, Wen X, Pritchard JK. 2006. A map of recent positive selection in the human genome. PLoS Biol. 4:e72.
53. Wall JD. 1999. Recombination and the power of statistical tests of neutrality. Genet Res. 74:65-79.
54. Wall JD. 2000. A comparison of estimators of the population recombination rate. Mol Biol Evol. 17:156-163.
55. Wall JD, Andolfatto P, Przeworski M. 2002. Testing models of selection and demography in Drosophila simulans. Genetics. 162:203-216.
56. Wall JD, Hudson RR. 2001. Coalescent simulations and statistical tests of neutrality. Mol Biol Evol. 18:1134-1135; author reply 1136-1138.
57. Wang ET, Kodama G, Baldi P, Moyzis RK. 2006. Global landscape of recent inferred Darwinian selection for Homo sapiens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103:135-140.
58. Watterson GA. 1975. On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor Popul Biol. 7:256-276.
59. Watterson GA. 1978. The homozygosity test of neutrality. Genetics. 88:405-417.
60. Wright S. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics. 16:97-159.
61. Zeng K, Fu Y.-X, Shi S, Wu C-I. 2006. Statistical tests for detecting positive selection by utilizing high-frequency variants. Genetics. 174:1431-1439.
62. Zeng K, Mano S, Shi S, Wu C-I. 2007. Comparisons of site- and haplotype-frequency methods for detecting positive selection. Mol Biol Evol. 24:1562-1574.