Inferring the demographic history and rate of adaptive substitution in Drosophila

PLoS Genetics

Volumn 2, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1580-1589

  Li, Haipeng ^a   Stephan, Wolfgang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DNA POLYMORPHISM; DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; INSECT GENETICS; NONHUMAN; POPULATION GENETICS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; X CHROMOSOME; ADAPTATION; AFRICA; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EUROPE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MUTAGENESIS;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; AFRICA; ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EUROPE; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETICS, POPULATION; MODELS, GENETIC; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MUTAGENESIS; SELECTION (GENETICS);

EID: 33750491918     PISSN: 15537390     EISSN: 15537404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020166     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Li WH, Wu CI, Luo CC (1985) A new method for estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous rates of nucleotide substitution considering the relative likelihood of nucleotide and codon changes. Mol Biol Evol 2: 150-174.
2. McDonald JH, Kreitman M (1991) Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature 351: 652-654.
3. Nielsen R, Bustamante C, Clark AG, Glanowski S, Sackton TB, et al. (2005) A scan for positively selected genes in the genomes of humans and chimpanzees. PLoS Biol 3: e170. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030170
4. Smith NGC, Eyre-Walker A (2002) Adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila. Nature 415: 1022-1024.
5. Eyre-Walker A (2002) Changing effective population size and the McDonald-Kreitman test. Genetics 162: 2017-2024.
6. Tajima F (1989) Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123: 585-595.
7. Fu YX, Li WH (1993) Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics 133: 693-709.
8. Fay JC, Wu CI (2000) Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection. Genetics 155: 1405-1413.
9. Kim Y, Stephan W (2002) Detecting a local signature of genetic hitchhiking along a recombining chromosome. Genetics 160: 765-777.
10. Kim Y, Nielsen R (2004) Linkage disequilibrium as a signature of selective sweeps. Genetics 167: 1513-1524.
11. Jensen JD, Kim Y, Bauer DuMont V, Aquadro CF, Bustamante CD (2005) Distinguishing between selective sweeps and demography using DNA polymorphism data. Genetics 170: 1401-1410.
12. Li H, Stephan W (2005) Maximum likelihood methods for detecting recent positive selection and localizing the selected site in the genome. Genetics 171: 377-384.
13. Nielsen R, Williamson S, Kim Y, Hubisz MJ, Clark AG, et al. (2005) Genomic scans for selective sweeps using SNP data. Genome Res 15: 1566-1575.
14. Przeworski M (2002) The signature of positive selection at randomly chosen loci. Genetics 160: 1179-1189.
15. Begun DJ, Aquadro CF (1993) African and North American populations of Drosophila melanogaster are very different at the DNA level. Nature 365: 548-550.
16. Glinka S, Ometto L, Mousset S, Stephan W, De Lorenzo D (2003) Demography and natural selection have shaped genetic variation in Drosophila melanogaster: A multi-locus approach. Genetics 165: 1269-1278.
17. Haddrill PR, Thornton KR, Charlesworth B, Andolfatto P (2005) Multilocus patterns of nucleotide variability and the demographic and selection history of Drosophila melanogaster populations. Genome Res 15: 790-799.
18. Ometto L, Glinka S, De Lorenzo D, Stephan W (2005) Inferring the effects of demography and selection on Drosophila melanogaster populations from a chromosome-wide scan of DNA variation. Mol Biol Evol 22: 2119-2130.
19. Nielsen R (2000) Estimation of population parameters and recombination rates from single nucleotide polymorphisms. Genetics 154: 931-942.
20. Wakeley J, Hey J (1997) Estimating ancestral population parameters. Genetics 145: 847-855.
21. Li YJ, Satta Y, Takahata N (1999) Paleo-demography of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup: Application of the maximum likelihood method. Genes Genet Syst 74: 117-127.
22. Fu YX (1997) Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics 147: 915-925.
23. Weiss G, von Haeseler A (1998) Inference of population history using a likelihood approach. Genetics 149: 1539-1546.
24. Thornton KR, Andolfatto P (2006) Approximate Bayesian inference reveals evidence for a recent, severe bottleneck in a Netherlands population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 172: 1607-1619.
25. Comeron JM, Kreitman M, Aguadé M (1999) Natural selection on synonymous sites is correlated with gene length and recombination in Drosophila. Genetics 151: 239-249.
26. Webb T III, Bartlein PJ (1992) Global changes during the last 3 million years: Climatic controls and biotic responses. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23: 141-173.
27. De Vivo M, Carmignotto AP (2004) Holocene vegetation change and the mammal faunas of South America and Africa. J Biogeogr 31: 943-957.
28. Andolfatto P (2005) Adaptive evolution of non-coding DNA in Drosophila. Nature 437: 1149-1152.
29. Teshima KM, Coop G, Przeworski M (2006) How reliable are empirical genomic scans for selective sweeps? Genome Res 16: 702-712.
30. Maynard Smith J, Haigh J (1974) The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res 23: 23-35.
31. Kaplan NL, Hudson RR, Langley CH (1989) The "hitchhiking effect" revisited. Genetics 123: 887-899.
32. Stephan W, Wiehe THE, Lenz MW (1992) The effect of strongly selected substitutions on neutral polymorphism: Analytical results based on diffusion theory. Theor Popul Biol 41: 237-254.
33. Barton NH (1998) The effect of hitchhiking on neutral genealogies. Genet Res 72: 123-133.
34. Innan H, Kim Y (2004) Pattern of polymorphism after strong artificial selection in a domestication event. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 10667-10672.
35. Hermisson J, Pennings PS (2005) Soft sweeps: Molecular population genetics of adaptation from standing genetic variation. Genetics 169: 2335-2352.
36. Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16: 111-120.
37. Zhang J, Gu X (1998) Correlation between the substitution rate and rate variation among sites in protein evolution. Genetics 149: 1615-1625.
38. Li H, Zhang Y, Zhang YP, Fu YX (2003) Neutrality tests using DNA polymorphism from multiple samples. Genetics 163: 1147-1151.
39. Hudson RR (1990) Gene genealogies and the coalescent process. In: Futuyma D, Antonovics J, editors. Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology. Volume 7. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 1-44.
40. Li WH, Fu YX (1998) Coalescent theory and its applications in population genetics. In: Halloran E, editor. Statistics in genetics. New York: Springer-Verlag.
41. Wiuf C, Hein J (1999) Recombination as a point process along sequences. Theoret Popul Biol 55: 248-259.
42. Braverman JM, Hudson RR, Kaplan NL, Langley CH, Stephan W (1995) The hitchhiking effect on the site frequency spectrum of DNA polymorphisms. Genetics 140: 783-796.
43. Pawitan Y (2001) In all likelihood: Statistical modelling and inference using likelihood. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 29-69.
44. Felsenstein J (1992) Estimating effective population size from samples of sequences: A bootstrap Monte Carlo integration method. Genet Res 60: 209-220.
45. Kuhner MK, Yamato J, Felsenstein J (1995) Estimating effective population size and mutation rate from sequence data using Metropolis-Hastings sampling. Genetics 140: 1421-1430.