Value priorities in american and british female and male university students

Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 143, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 127-138

  Ryckman, Richard M ^a   Houston, Diane M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Gender differences; Nationality; Value priorities

Indexed keywords

ACHIEVEMENT; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ETHNOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STUDENT; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES;

ACHIEVEMENT; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL VALUES; STUDENTS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0037313874     PISSN: 00224545     EISSN: 19401183     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00224540309598435     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Anderson, M. L. (1993). Thinking about women: Sociological perspectives on sex and gender. New York: Macmillan.
2. Auster, C. J., & Ohm, S. C. (2000). Masculinity and femininity in contemporary society: A réévaluation using the Bern Sex-Role Inventory. Sex Roles, 43, 499-528.
3. Bern, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354-364.
4. Beutel, A. M., & Marini, M. M. (1995). Gender and values. American Sociological Review, 60, 436-448.
5. Bond, M. (1994). Finding universal dimensions of individual variation in multicultural studies of values: The Rokeach and Chinese Value Surveys. In B. Puka (Ed.), New research in moral development. Moral development: A compendium (Vol. 5, pp. 385-391). New York: Garland.
6. Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive: Studies in evaluative dependence. New York: Wiley.
7. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Eccles, J., Barber, B., Jozefowicz, D., Malenchuk, O., & Vida, M. (1999). Self-evaluations of competence, task values, and self-esteem. In N. G. Johnson, M. C. Roberts, & J. Worell (Eds.), Beyond appearance: A new look at adolescent girls (pp. 53-83). Wash-ington, DC: American Psychological Association.
9. Equal Opportunities Commission. (1997). Work and parenting: Briefings on men and women in Britain. Manchester, UK: Author.
10. Feather, N. T. (1984). Masculinity, femininity, psychological androgyny, and the structure of values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 604-620.
11. Feather, N. T. (1987). Gender differences in values. In F. Halisch & J. Kuhl (Eds.), Motivation, intention, and volition (pp. 31-45). New York: Springer-Verlag.
12. Fijneman, Y. A., Willemsen, M. E., & Poortinga, Y. H. (1995). Individualism-collectivism: An empirical study of a conceptual issue. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27. 381-402.
13. Florentine, R. (1988). Increasing similarity in the values and life plans of male and female college students? Evidence and implications. Sex Roles, 18, 143-158.
14. Guttman, L. (1968). A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points. Psychometrika, 33, 469-506.
15. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
16. Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
17. Houston, D. M. (2000). Attribution, social comparison, and academic performance. Swindon, UK: Economic and Social Research Council Research Project.
18. Inglehart, R., Basanez, M., & Moreno, A. (1998). Human values and beliefs: A cross-cultural sourcebook. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
19. Kagitcibasi, C. (1997). Individualism and collectivism. In J. W. Berry, M. H. Segall, & C. Kagitcibasi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (pp. 1-49). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
20. Kilby, R. W. (1993). The study of human values. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
21. Major, B. (1987). Gender, justice, and the psychology of entitlement. In P. Shaver & C. Hendrick (Eds.), Sex and gender (pp. 124-148). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22. Novack, L. L., & Novack, D. R. (1996). Being female in the eighties and nineties: Conflicts between opportunities and traditional expectations among White, middle class, heterosexual college women. Sex Roles, 35, 57-77.
23. Nowell, A., & Hedges, L. V. (1998). Trends in gender differences in academic achievement from 1960 to 1994: An analysis of differences in mean, variance, and extreme scores. Sex Roles, 39, 21-43.
24. Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. (1955). Family, socialization, and interaction process. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
25. Prince-Gibson, E., & Schwartz, S. H. (1998). Value priorities and gender. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 49-67.
26. Reynolds, W. M. (1982). Development of a reliable and valid short form of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 119-125.
27. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
28. Rosen, B. C. (1989). Women, work, and achievement: The endless revolution. New York: St. Martin's Press.
29. Ryckman, R. M., Libby, C. R., van den Borne, B., Gold, J. A., & Lindner, M. A. (1997). Values of hypercompetitive and personal development competitive individuals. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69, 271-283.
30. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
31. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19-45.
32. Smith, P. B., & Schwartz, S. H. (1997). Values. In J. W. Berry, M. H. Segall, & C. Kagitcibasi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (pp. 77-118). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
33. Spence, J. T., & Buckner, C. E. (2000). Instrumental and expressive traits, trait stereotypes, and sexist attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 44-62.
34. Vogler, C. (1994). Segregation, sexism, and labour supply. In A. M. Scott (Ed.), Gender segregation and social change: Men and women in changing labour markets (pp. 39-79). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.