Why do local governments privatise public services? A survey of empirical studies

Local Government Studies

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 517-534

  Bel, Germà ^a   Fageda, Xavier ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; LOCAL GOVERNMENT; POLITICAL IDEOLOGY; POLITICAL PROCESS; PRIVATIZATION; PUBLIC SERVICE; TRANSACTION COST;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34547547980     PISSN: 03003930     EISSN: 17439388     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03003930701417528     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Alchian, A. A. (1967) Pricing and Society, Institute of Economic Affairs, London
2. Alchian, A. A. and Demsetz, H. (1972) Production, information costs and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62:5, pp. 777-795.
3. Bel, G. and Costas, A. (2006) Do public sector reforms get rusty? Local privatization in Spain. Journal of Policy Reform, 9:1, pp. 1-24.
4. Bel, G. and Miralles, A. (2003) Factors influencing privatization of urban solid waste collection in Spain. Urban Studies, 40:7, pp. 1323-1334.
5. Bel, G. and Miralles, A. (2005) Political and economic determinants of public services financing. Universitat de Barcelona
6. Bel, G. and Warner, M. (2006) Local privatization and costs: A review of empirical evidence. Universitat de Barcelona and Cornell University
7. Benton, J. and Menzel, D. (1992) Contracting and franchising county services in Florida. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 27:3, pp. 436-456.
8. Besley, T. and Coate, S. (1997) An economic model of representative democracy. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112:1, pp. 85-114.
9. Biais, B. and Perotti, E. C. (2002) Machiavellian privatization. American Economic Review, 92:1, pp. 240-258.
10. Boyne, G. (1998) Bureaucratic theory meets reality: Public choice and service contracting in U.S. local government. Public Administration Review, 58:6, pp. 474-484.
11. Boyne, G. (1998) The determinants of variations in local service contracting: Garbage in, garbage out. Urban Affairs Review, 34:1, pp. 150-163.
12. Brown, T., Potosky, M. and Van Slyke, D. (2007) Changing modes of service delivery: Costs and constraints. Government and Policy
13. Callan, S. and Thomas, J. (2001) Economies of scale and scope: A cost analysis of municipal solid waste services. Land Economics, 77:3, pp. 548-560.
14. Chandler, T. and Feuille, P. (1994) Cities, unions, and the privatization of sanitation services. Journal of Labor Research, 15:1, pp. 53-71.
15. Christoffersen, H. and Paldam, M. (2003) Markets and municipalities: A study of the behavior of the Danish municipalities. Public Choice, 114:2, pp. 79-102.
16. Crain, W. and Zardkoohi, A. (1978) A test of the property-rights theory of the firm: Water utilities in the United States. Journal of Law and Economics, 21:2, pp. 395-408.
17. Dijkgraaf, E., Gradus, R. H.J.M. and Melenberg, B. (2003) Contracting out refuse collection. Empirical Economics, 28:3, pp. 553-570.
18. Donahue, J. (1989) The Privatization Decision. Public Ends, Private Means, Basic Books, New York
19. Dubin, J. and Navarro, P. (1988) How markets for impure public goods organize: The case of household refuse collection. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 4:2, pp. 217-241.
20. Feldman, T. (1986) Efficiency and the provision of municipal services. Harvard University
21. Ferris, J. (1986) The decision to contract out: An empirical analysis. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 22:2, pp. 289-311.
22. Ferris, J. and Graddy, E. (1988) Production choices for local government services. Journal of Urban Affairs, 10:3, pp. 273-289.
23. Greene, J. (1996) Cities and privatization: Examining the effects of fiscal stress, location, and wealth in medium-sized cities. Policy Studies Journal, 24:1, pp. 135-144.
24. Grossman, W. and Hart, O. (1986) The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. Journal of Political Economy, 94:4, pp. 691-719.
25. Hart, O. and Moore, J. (1990) Property rights and the nature of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 98:6, pp. 1119-1158.
26. Hart, O., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1997) The proper scope of government: Theory and an application to prisons. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112:4, pp. 1127-1161.
27. Hebdon, R. and Jalette, P. (2007) The restructuring of municipal services: A Canada-United States comparison. Government and Policy
28. Hefetz, A. and Warner, W. (2004) Privatization and its reverse: explaining the dynamics of the government contracting process. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14:2, pp. 171-190.
29. Hefetz, A. and Warner, M. (2007) Beyond the market vs. planning dichotomy: Understanding privatisation and its reverse in U.S. cities. Local Government Studies, 33:4, pp. 555-571.
30. Hirsch, W. (1995) Factors important in local governments' privatization decisions. Urban Affairs Review, 31:2, pp. 226-243.
31. Hoene, C. (2004) Fiscal structure and the post-proposition 13 fiscal regime in California's cities. Public Budgeting and Finance, 24:4, pp. 51-72.
32. Kay, J. A. and Thompson, D. J. (1986) Privatisation: A policy in search of a rationale. Economic Journal, 96:381, pp. 18-32.
33. Kemper, P. and Quigley, J. (1976) The Economics of Refuse Collection, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA
34. Kitchen, H. (1976) A statistical estimation of an operating cost function for municipal refuse collection. Public Finance Quarterly, 4:1, pp. 56-76.
35. Kodrzycki, Y. (1998) Fiscal pressures and the privatization of local services. New England Economic Review, pp. 39-50.
36. Lee, D. S., Moretti, E. and Butler, M. J. (2004) Do voters affect or elect policies? Evidence from the U.S. House. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119:3, pp. 807-859.
37. Levin, J. and Tadelis, S. (2005) Contracting for government services: theory and evidence from U.S. cities.Stanford University, Mimeo
38. Levitt, S. D. (1996) How do senators vote? Disentangling the role of voter preferences, party affiliation and senator ideology. American Economic Review, 86:3, pp. 425-441.
39. López-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1997) Privatization in the United States. Rand Journal of Economics, 28:3, pp. 447-471.
40. Rodríguez, J. Martínez (2004) Los determinantes de la contratación externa de servicios municipales en España, Asociación Murciana de Ciencia Regional, Murcia
41. McGuire, R., Ohsfeldt, R. and Van Cott, T. N. (1987) The determinants of the choice between public and private production of publicly funded service. Public Choice, 54:3, pp. 211-230.
42. Megginson, W. L. and Netter, J. (2002) From state to market: A survey of empirical studies on privatization. Journal of Economic Literature, 30:2, pp. 321-389.
43. Ménard, C. and Saussier, S. (2000) Contractual choice and performance: The case of water supply in France. Revue d'Economie Industrielle, 92:2, pp. 385-404.
44. Miranda, R. (1994) Explaining the privatization decision among local governments in the United States. Research in Urban Policy, 5, pp. 231-274.
45. Miralles, A. (2006) Political economy of municipal water service privatization in the Spanish region of Catalonia: A duration model analysis. Universitat de Barcelona
46. Morgan, D., Hirlinger, M. and England, R. (1988) The decision to contract out city services: A further explanation. Western Political Quarterly, 41:2, pp. 363-372.
47. Morgan, W. (1977) Investor owned vs. publicly owned water agencies: An evaluation of the property rights theory of the firm. Water Resources Bulletin, 13:4, pp. 775-781.
48. Nelson, M. (1997) Municipal government approaches to service delivery: an analysis from a transaction cost perspective. Economic Inquiry, 35:1, pp. 82-96.
49. Niskanen, W. (1971) Bureaucracy and Representative Government, Aldine, Chicago, IL
50. Ohlsson, H. (2003) Ownership and production costs. Choosing between public production and contracting-out in the case of Swedish refuse collection. Fiscal Studies, 24:4, pp. 451-476.
51. Osborne, M. J. and Slivinski, A. (1996) A model of political competition with citizen-candidates. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111:1, pp. 65-96.
52. Pommerehne, W. and Frey, B. (1977) Public versus private production efficiency in Switzerland: A theoretical and empirical comparison. Comparing Urban Service Delivery Systems. Urban Affairs Annual Review, 12, pp. 221-241.
53. Savas, E. (1987) Privatization: The Key to Better Government, Chatham House Publishers, Chatham, NJ
54. Sappington, D. and Stiglitz, J. (1987) Privatization, information and incentives. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 6:4, pp. 567-582.
55. Stein, R. (1990) Urban Alternatives. Public and Private Markets in the Provision of Local Services, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA
56. Stevens, B. (1978) Scale, market structure, and the cost of refuse collection. Review of Economics and Statistics, 60:3, pp. 438-448.
57. Tiebout, C. (1956) A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64:2, pp. 416-424.
58. Vickers, J. and Yarrow, G. (1988) Privatization: An Economic Analysis, MIT Press, London
59. Walls, M., Macauley, M. and Anderson, S. (2005) Private markets, contracts, and government provision. What explains the organization of local waste and recycling markets?. Urban Affairs Review, 40:5, pp. 590-613.
60. Warner, M. E. and Hebdon, R. (2001) Local government restructuring: privatization and its alternatives. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20:2, pp. 315-336.
61. Warner, M. E. and Hefetz, A. (2002) Applying market solutions to public services: An assessment of efficiency, equity and voice. Urban Affairs Review, 38:1, pp. 70-89.
62. Williamson, O. E. (1979) Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics, 22:2, pp. 233-261.
63. Williamson, O. E. (1999) Public and private bureaucracies: A transaction cost economics perspective. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 15:1, pp. 306-342.
64. Yarrow, G. (1999) A theory of privatization, or why bureaucrats are still in business. World Development, 27:1, pp. 157-168.
65. Young, S. (2005) Outsourcing in the Australian health sector: The interplay of economics and politics. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 18:1, pp. 25-36.
66. th annual Meeting of the Labour and Employment Relations Association (LERA, former IRRA) Philadelphia