Clinically controlled study on the quality of class III, IV and V composite restorations after two years

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 247-253

  Geitel, Birgit ^a   Kwiatkowski, Ralf ^b   Zimmer, Stefan ^a   Barthel, Claudia R ^a   Roulet, Jean François ^a   Jahn, Klaus Roland ^a  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b Humboldt University ^*

Author keywords

Clinical investigation; Hybrid composite; Longitudinal study; Microfilled composite; Ryge criterion

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; BIOMATERIAL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; DECOLORIZATION; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ANATOMY; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROCESS DESIGN; QUALITY CONTROL; TOOTH COLOR; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH FILLING;

ADULT; COLOR; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY LINING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); RESIN CEMENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 7044229808     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. DIN EN 540: Klinische Prüfung von Medizinprodukten an Menschen; 1993.
2. Dental Vademekum: Deutscher Ärzte-Verlag Köln, Hrsg: Bundeszahnärztekammer/KZBV 6; 1998.
3. Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg Meyer B, Monting JS. Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation. Oper Dent 2000;25:259-264.
4. Baillod R, Krejci I, Lutz F. 'Adhäsive Frontzahnrestorationen' unter Dentinadhäsivanwendung mit und ohne Unterfüllung. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1994;104:290-296.
5. Bouschlicher MR, Vargas MA, Boyer DB. Effect of composite type, light intensity, configuration factor and laser polymerization on polymerization contraction forces. Am J Dent 1997;10:88-96.
6. Browning WD, Brackett WW, Gilpatrick RO. Two-year clinical comparison of a microfilled and a hybrid resin-based composite in non-carious Class V lesions. Oper Dent 2000;25:46-50.
7. Chu CH, King NM, Lee AM, Yiu CK, Wei SH. A pilot study of the marginal adaptation and surface morphology of glass-cermet cements. Quintessence Int 1996;27:493-501.
8. Crisp RJ, Burke FJ. One-year clinical evaluation of compomer restorations placed in general practice. Quintessence Int 2000;31:181-186.
9. Dietschi D, Holz J. A clinical trial of four light-curing posterior composite resins: two-year report. Quintessence Int 1990;21:965-975.
10. Eick JD, Robinson SJ, Byerley TJ, Chappelow CC. Adhesives and nonshrinking dental resins of the future. Quintessence Int 1993;24:632-640.
11. Gordan VV, Boyer D, Soderholm KJ. Enamel and dentine shear bond strength of two resin modified glass ionomers and two resin based adhesives. J Dent 1998;26:497-503.
12. Hickel R. Moderne Füllungswerkstoffe. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1997;52:572-585.
13. Jahn KR. Zu Methodik und Erfahrungen des klinisch kontrollierten Experiments. Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl 1990;78:127-130.
14. Krejci I, Guntert A, Lutz F. Scanning electron microscopic and clinical examination of composite resin inlays/onlays up to 12 months in situ. Quintessence Int 1994;25:403-409.
15. Luo Y, Lo EC, Fang DT, Wei SH. Clinical evaluation of polyacid-modified resin composite posterior restorations: one-year results. Quintessence Int 2000;31:630-636.
16. Perdigao J, Carmo AR, Geraldeli S, Dutra HR, Masuda MS. Six-month clinical evaluation of two dentin adhesives applied on dry vs moist dentin. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:343-352.
17. Prati C, Nucci C, Davidson CL, Montanari G. Early marginal leakage and shear bond strength of adhesive restorative systems. Dent Mater 1990;6:195-200.
18. Reusens B, D'Hoore W, Vreven J. In vivo comparison of a microfilled and a hybrid minifilled composite resin in Class III restorations: 2-year follow-up. Clin Oral Investig 1999;3:62-69.
19. Roulet JF, Seewaldt A, Noack MJ. Margin quality of Class III and IV composites in vitro. Dent Mater 1991;7:179-185.
20. Ryge, G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 1980;30:347-358.
21. Setz J, Geis Gerstorfer J, Lin W. Zum Einfluss anorganischer Füller auf die Eigenschaften lichtpolymerisierender Komposite. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1991;46:657-660.
22. Sidhu SK, Henderson LJ. In vitro marginal leakage of cervical composite restorations lined with a light-cured glass ionomer. Oper Dent 1992;17:7-12.
23. Smales RJ, Gerke DC. Clinical evaluation of light-cured anterior resin composites over periods of up to 4 years. Am J Dent 1992;5:208-212.
24. Strassler HE, Bauman G. Current concepts in polishing composite resins. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1993;5(3 Suppl 1):12-17.
25. Tate AR, Ng MW, Needleman HL, Acs G. Failure rates of restorative procedures following dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia. Pediatr Dent 2002;24:69-71.
26. Tjan AH, Chan CA. The polishability of posterior composites. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:138-146.
27. Trushkowsky RD, Gwinnett AJ. Microleakage of Class V composite, resin sandwich, and resin-modified glass ionomers. Am J Dent 1996;9:96-99.
28. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998;26:1-20.
29. Vanherle G, Lambrechts P, Braem M. Erfahrungen mit Komposit- Füllungsmaterialien im Seitenzahnbereich. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1989;44:664-668.
30. Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Composite resins in the 21st century. Quintessence Int 1993;24:641-658.