Pedagogical affect, student interest, and learning performance

Journal of Business Research

Volumn 60, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 960-964

  Abrantes, José Luís ^a   Seabra, Cláudia ^b   Lages, Luís Filipe ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDADE NOVA DE LISBOA   (Portugal)

^b POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE OF VISEU   (Portugal)

^c NOVA SCHOOL OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Learning outcomes; Marketing education; Pedagogy; Student behavior

Indexed keywords

EID: 34447642502     PISSN: 01482963     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.10.026     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Cahn S. Faculty members should be evaluated by their peers, not by their students. Chron High Educ 14 (1987) B2 [October]
2. Clayson D.E., and Haley D.A. Student evaluations in marketing: what is actually being measured?. J Mark Educ 12 (1990) 9-17 [Fall]
3. Duke C.R. Learning outcomes: comparing student perceptions of skill level and importance. J Mark Educ 24 3 (2002) 203-217
4. Dunn R., Giannitti M.C., Murray J.B., and Rossi I. Grouping students for instruction: effects on learning style on achievement and attitudes. J Soc Psychol 130 5 (1990) 485-494
5. Engelland B.T., Workman L., and Singh M. Ensuring service quality for campus career services centers: a modified SERVQUAL scale. J Mark Educ 22 3 (2000) 236-245
6. Feldman K.A. Effective college teaching from the students' and faculty view: matched or mismatched priorities?. Res High Educ 28 (1998) 291-344
7. Fornell C., and Larcker D. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18 1 (1981) 39-50
8. Frontczak N.T. A paradigm for the selection, use and development of experiential learning activities in marketing education. Mark Educ Rev 8 3 (1998) 25-34
9. Gremler D.D., and McCollough M.A. Student satisfaction guarantees: an empirical examination of attitudes, antecedents, and consequences. J Mark Educ 24 2 (2002) 150-160
10. Hammond L.F., and Snyder J. Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teach Teach Educ 16 (2000) 523-545
11. Hsu C.H.C. Learning styles of hospitality students: nature or nurture. Hosp Manage 18 (1999) 17-30
12. Karns G.L. Marketing student perceptions of learning activities: structure, preferences, and effectiveness. J Mark Educ 15 1 (1993) 3-10
13. Marks R.B. Determinants of student evaluations of global measures of instructor and course value. J Mark Educ 22 2 (2000) 108-119
14. Marsh H. Students' evaluations of university teaching: dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility. J Educ Psychol 11 3 (1987) 707-794
15. Marsh H. Multidimensional students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness: a test of alternative higher-order structures. Appl Psychol Meas 83 (1991) 285-296
16. Marsh H., and Cooper T.L. Prior subject interest, students' evaluations, and instructional effectiveness. Multivariate Behav Res 16 (1981) 88-104
17. Matthews D.B. An investigation of students' learning styles in various disciplines in colleges and universities. J Humanist Educ Dev 33 3 (1994) 65-74
18. Parasuraman A., Zeithaml V.A., and Berry L.L. A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. J Mark 49 (1985) 41-50
19. Paswan K.A., and Young J.A. Student evaluation of instructor: a nomological investigation using structural equation modeling. J Mark Educ 24 3 (2002) 193-202
20. Richard D., Misra S., and Auken S.V. Relating pedagogical preferences of marketing seniors and alumni to attitudes toward the major. J Mark Educ 22 2 (2000) 147-154
21. Silins H., and Mulford B. Schools as learning organizations - Effects on teacher leadership and student outcomes. Sch Eff Sch Improv 15 3-4 (2004) 443-466
22. Tynjälä P. Towards expert knowledge? A comparison between a constructivist and a traditional learning environment in the university. Int J Educ Res 31 (1999) 357-442
23. Willemse M., Lunenberg M., and Korthagen F. Values in education: a challenge for teacher educators. Teach Teach Educ 21 (2005) 205-217
24. Young M.R., Klemz B.R., and Murphy J.W. Enhancing learning outcomes: the effects of instructional technology, learning styles, instructional methods, and student behavior. J Mark Educ 25 2 (2003) 130-142