Student Evaluation of Instructor: A Nomological Investigation Using Structural Equation Modeling

Journal of Marketing Education

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 193-202

  Paswan, Audhesh K ^a   Young, Joyce A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

^b INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992815763     PISSN: 02734753     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0273475302238042     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Abrami, P. C., S. d’Apollonia, and P. A. Cohen. 1990. Validity of student ratings of instruction: What we know and what we do not. Journal of Educational Psychology 82:219-231.
2. Achrol, R. S., and L. Stern. 1988. Environmental determinants of decisionmaking uncertainty in marketing channels. Journal of Marketing Research 25 (1): 36-50.
3. Bagozzi, R. P., and Y. Yi. 1988. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16 (2): 74-94.
4. Baird, J. S. 1987. Perceived learning in relation to student evaluation of university instruction. Journal of Education Psychology 79 (1): 90-91.
5. Bertsch, T., and L. Peek. 1982. Determinant of measurement scales for revising or developing teacher evaluation instruments. Journal of Marketing Education 4 (1): 15-24.
6. Bharadwaj, S., C. M. Futrell, and D. M. Kantak. 1993. Using student evaluations to improve learning. Marketing Education Review 3 (2): 16-21.
7. Boex, J. L. F. 2000. Attributes of effective economic instructors: An analysis of student evaluations. Journal of Economic Education 31 (3): 211-223.
8. Bollen, K. A. 1989. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley.
9. Bradley, G. W. 1978. Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36 (1): 56-71.
10. Brightman, H. J., M. L. Elliott, and Y. Bhada. 1993. Increasing the effectiveness of student evaluation of instructor data through a factor score comparative report. Decision Sciences 24:192-199.
11. Cashin, W. E. 1988. Student ratings of teaching: A summary of the research. IDEA Paper no. 20. Manhattan, KS: Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development, Kansas State University.
12. Cashin, W. E. 1995. Student ratings of teaching: The Research Revisited (IDEA Paper #32). Manhattan, KS: Center for Faculty Evaluation & Development, Kansas State University.
13. Centra, J. A. 1977. Student ratings of instruction and their relationship to student learning. American Educational Research Journal 14:17-24.
14. Centra, J. A. 1993. Reflective faculty evaluation: Enhancing teaching and determining faculty effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15. Clayson, D. E. 1999. Students’ evaluation of teaching effectiveness: Some implications of stability. Journal of Marketing Education 21 (1): 68-75.
16. Clayson, D. E., and D. A. Haley. 1990. Student evaluations in marketing: What is actually being measured? Journal of Marketing Education 12 (3): 9-17.
17. Cohen, P. A. 1981. Student ratings of instruction and student achievement: A meta-analysis of multisection validity studies. Review of Educational Research 51:281-309.
18. Costin, F., W. T. Greenough, and R. J. Menges. 1971. Student ratings of college teaching: Reliability, validity, and usefulness. Review of Educational Research 41:511-535.
19. Cronbach, L. J. 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16:297-334.
20. d’Apollonia, Sylvia, and Philip C. Abrami. 1997. Navigating student ratings of instruction. American Psychologist 52 (11): 1198-1208.
21. Dommeyer, C. J. 1997. Class size in an introductory marketing course: Student attitudes, evaluations, and performance. Marketing Education Review 7 (1): 13-25.
22. Dowell, D. B., and J. A. Neal. 1982. A selective review of the validity of student ratings of teaching. Journal of Higher Education 53 (1): 51-62.
23. Doyle, K. O., and S. E. Whitely. 1974. Student ratings as criteria for effective teaching. American Educational Research Journal 11:259-274.
24. Frey, P. W., D. W. Leonard, and W. W. Beatty. 1975. Student ratings of instruction: Validation research. American Educational Research Journal 12:435-447.
25. Gardner, W. L., and M. J. Martinko. 1988. Impression management in organizations. Journal of Management 14 (2): 321-338.
26. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., and D. B. Balkin. 1992. Determinants of faculty pay: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal 35 (5): 921-955.
27. Grunenwald, J. P., and L. Ackerman. 1986. A modified Delphi approach for the development of student evaluations of faculty teaching. Journal of Marketing Education 8 (2): 32-38.
28. Guseman, D. 1985. Class size impact upon student learning and attitudes in the introductory marketing course. Journal of Marketing Education 7 (1): 2-7.
29. Hair, J. F., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham, and W. C. Black. 1995. Multivariate data analysis with readings. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
30. Jöreskog, K. G., and D. Sörbom. 1984. LISREL VI: Analysis of linear structural relations by the method of maximum likelihood. Chicago: National Education Resources.
31. Jussim, L. 1989. Teacher expectations: Self-fulfilling prophecies, perceptual biases, and accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57 (3): 469-480.
32. Linn, R. L., J. A. Centra, and L. Tucker. 1975. Between, within, and total group factor analysis of student ratings of instruction. Multivariate Behavioral Research 10:277-288.
33. Loftin, L. B. 1993. Factor analysis of the IDEA student rating instrument for introductory college science and mathematics courses. In Proceedings: Mid-South Educational Research Association, edited by J. Petry, 277-279. Memphis, TN: University of Memphis and MSER.
34. Lundsten, N. L. 1986. Student evaluations in a business administration curriculum: A marketing viewpoint. AMA Developments in Marketing Science 9:169-173.
35. Marks, Ronald B. 2000. Determinants of student evaluations of global measures of instructor and course value. Journal of Marketing Education 22 (2): 108-119.
36. Marlin, J. W., and J. F. Niss. 1980. End-of-course evaluations an indicators of student learning and instructor effectiveness. Journal of Economic Education 21 (2): 16-27.
37. Marsh, H. W. 1982. The use of path analysis to estimate teacher and course effects in student rating's of instructional effectiveness. Applied Psychological Measurement 6:47-59.
38. Marsh, H. W. 1987. Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research 11 (3): 253-288.
39. Marsh, H. W. 1991. Multidimensional students'evaluations of teaching effectiveness: A test of alternative higher-order structures. Applied Psychological Measurement 83:285-296.
40. Marsh, H. W., H. Fleiner, and C. S. Thomas. 1976. Validity and usefulness of student evaluations of instructional quality. Journal of Educational Psychology 67:833-839.
41. Marsh, H. W., and D. Hocevar. 1984. The factorial invariance of student evaluations of college teaching. American Educational Research Journal 21:341-366.
42. Marsh, H. W. 1991. Students’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness: The stability of mean ratings of the same teacher over a 13 year period. Teaching and Teacher Education 7 (4): 303-314.
43. Marsh, H. W., and L. Roche. 1992. The use of students'evaluations and an individually structured intervention to enhance university teaching effectiveness. Campbelltown, Australia: University of Western Sydney.
44. Martin, J. R. 1998. Evaluating faculty based on student opinion: Problems, implications and recommendations from Deming's theory of management perspective. Issues in Accounting Education 13 (4): 1079-1094.
45. McKeachie, W. J. 1990. Research on college teaching: The historical background. Journal Educational Psychology 82 (2): 189-200.
46. Nelson, C. 1997. Tools for tampering with teaching's taboos. In New paradigms for college teaching, edited by W. E. Campbell and K. A. Smith. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
47. Nelson, J. P., and K. A. Lynch. 1984. Grade inflation, real income, simultaneity, and teacher evaluations. Journal of Economic Education 15 (1): 21-37.
48. Nerger, J. L., W. Viney, and R. G. Riedel. 1997. Student ratings of teaching effectiveness: Use and misuse. The Midwest Quarterly 38:218-233.
49. Nicastro, M. 1995. The future is now: Preparing for OBE-educated students. Marketing News 14: 1-1, 6-6.
50. Noe, Raymond A. 1986. Trainees’ attributes and attitudes: Neglected influences on training effectiveness. Academy of Management Review 11 (4): 736-749.
51. Orsini, J. 1988. Halo effects in student evaluations of faculty: A case application. Journal of Marketing Education 10 (2): 38-45.
52. Ortinau, D. J., A. J. Bush, R. P. Bush, and J. L. Twible. 1989. The use of importance-performance analysis for improving the quality of marketing education: Interpreting faculty-course evaluations. Journal of Marketing Education 11 (2): 78-86.
53. Pfeffer, J., and G. R. Salancik. 1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
54. Schlenker, B. R. 1980. Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relation. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
55. Schrader, M. A. 1988. Relationships of student ratings of course, instructor, and student elements to student overall ratings of instructors of courses at Lakeshore Technical College. Ph.D. diss., Nova University, Fort Lauderdale, FL.
56. Scriven, M. 1981. Summative teacher evaluations. In Handbook of teacher evaluation, edited by J. Milliman, 244-271. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
57. Scriven, M. 1989. The design and use of forms for the student evaluation of teaching. Instructional Evaluation 10:1-13.
58. Seldin, P. 1985. Current practices in evaluating business school faculty. Pleasantville, NY: Pace University.
59. Seldin, P. 1993. The use and abuse of student ratings of professors. Chronicle of Higher Education 21 (July): A40-A40.
60. SIRS research report 2: Student instructional rating system, stability of factor structure. 1971. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, Office of Evaluation Services.
61. Stringer, M., and P. Irwing. 1998. Students'evaluations of teaching effectiveness: A structural modeling approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology 68:409-426.
62. Tang, T.L.-P. 1997. Teaching evaluation at a public institution of higher education: Factors related to the overall teaching. Public Personnel Management 26 (3): 379-389.
63. Wallace, J. J., and W. A. Wallace. 1998. Why the cost of student evaluations have long since exceeded their value. Issues in Accounting Education 13 (2): 443-447.
64. Weiner, B. 1985. An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Journal of Economic Education 16 (2): 16-27.
65. Wheeler, G. E., and M. D. Geurts. 1986. Student evaluations of faculty: A longitudinal study from one department in a business school. Journal of Marketing Education 8 (2): 24-31.
66. Wilson, R. C. 1990. Commentary: The education of a faculty developer. Journal of Educational Psychology 82 (2): 272-274.
67. Wilson, R. C. 1998. New research casts doubt on value of student evaluations of professors. The Chronicle of Higher Education 44 (19): A12-A14.
68. Wilson, T. C. 1982. Student-faculty evaluation forms in marketing: A review. Journal of Marketing Education 4 (1): 7-14.
69. Wilson, T. C., and P. A. Wilson. 1977. Difference in student evaluations from business vs. other colleges. In Proceedings: Southern Marketing Association, edited by H. Nash and D. Robin, 277-279. MS: Southern Marketing Association.