SDM: A fast distance-based approach for (super)tree building in phylogenomics

Systematic Biology

Volumn 55, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 740-755

  Criscuolo, Alexis ^a,b   Berry, Vincent ^b   Douzery, Emmanuel J P ^a   Gascuel, Olivier ^b  

^a INSTITUT DES SCIENCES DE L EVOLUTION   (France)

^b LIRMM   (France)

Author keywords

Distance method; Evolutionary distances; MRP; Phylogenomics; Supermatrix; Supertree; Total evidence

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVALUATION; GENOMICS; METHODOLOGY; PHYLOGENY;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENOMICS; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 34447341925     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150600969872     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Anisimova, M., and O. Gascuel. 2006. Approximate likelihood ratio test for branches: A fast, accurate and powerful alternative. Syst. Biol. in press.
2. Barthélemy, J. P., and A. Guénoche. 1991. Trees and proximity relations. Wiley-Interscience Series in Discrete Mathematics and Optimization. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
3. Baum, B. R. 1992. Combining trees as a way of combining data sets for phylogenetic inference, and the desirability of combining gene trees. Taxon 41:3-10.
4. Berry, V., and O. Gascuel. 1996. Interpretation of bootstrap trees: Threes-hold of clade selection and induced gain. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:999-1011. (Pubitemid 26284916)
5. Bevan, R. B., B. F. Lang, and D. Bryant. 2005. Calculating the evolutionary rates of different genes: A fast, accurate estimator with applications to maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 54:900-915.
6. Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., editor. 2004. Phylogenetic supertrees: Combining information to reveal the tree of life. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
7. Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., and H. N. Bryant. 1998. Properties of matrix representation with parsimony analyses. Syst. Biol. 47:497-508. (Pubitemid 128451088)
8. Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., and M. J. Sanderson. 2001. Assessment of the accuracy of matrix representation with parsimony supertree construction. Syst. Biol. 50:565-579.
9. Bourque, M. 1978. Arbres de Steiner et réseaux dont varie l'emplagement de certains sommets. PhD thesis, Département d'informatique et de recherche opérationnelle, University de Montréal.
10. Bryant, D. 2001. A classification of consensus methods for phylogenetics. Pages 163-184 in Bioconsensus (M. Janowitz, F.-J. Lapointe, F. R. McMorris, B. Mirkin, F. S. Roberts, eds.). DIMACS-AMS edition, Providence.
11. Creevey, C. J. and J. O. Mclnerney. 2005. Clann: Investigating phylogenetic information through supertree analyses. Bioinformatics 21:390-392. (Pubitemid 40246612)
12. Daubin, V., M. Gouy, and G. Perriere. 2002. A phylogenomic approach to bacterial phylogeny: Evidence of a core of genes sharing a common history. Genome Res. 12:1080-1090. (Pubitemid 34785201)
13. De Soete, G. 1984. Additive tree representations of incomplete dissimilarity data. Quality Quantity 18:387-393.
14. Desper, R., and O. Gascuel. 2002. Fast and accurate phylogeny reconstruction algorithms based on the minimum-evolution principle. J. Comp. Biol. 19:687-705. (Pubitemid 36042994)
15. Devulder, G., M. Pérouse de Montclos, and J. P. Flandrois. 2005. A multigene approach to phylogenetic analysis using the genus Mycobacterium as a model. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 55:293-302. (Pubitemid 40185504)
16. Driskell, A. C, C. Ané, J. G. Burleigh, M. M. McMahon, B. C. O'Meara, and M. J. Sanderson. 2004. Pospects for building the tree of life from large sequence databases. Science 306:1172-1174. (Pubitemid 39488993)
17. Eisen, J. A., and C. M. Fraser. 2003. Phylogenomics: Intersection of evolution and genomics. Science 300:1706-1707. (Pubitemid 36712558)
18. Estabrook, G. F., F. R. McMorris, and C. A. Meacham. 1985. Comparison of undirected phylogenetic trees based on subtrees of four evolutionary units. Syst. Zool. 34:193-200.
19. Eulenstein, O., D. Chen, J. G. Burleigh, D. Fernandez-Baca, and M. J. Sanderson. 2004. Performance of flip supertree construction with a heuristic algorithm. Syst. Biol. 53:299-308. (Pubitemid 38611184)
20. Farach, M., S. Kannan, and T. Warnow. 1995. A robust model for finding optimal evolutionary trees. Algorithmica 13:155-179.
21. Felsenstein, J. 1993. Phylip: Phylogeny inference package, version 3.6b. Distributed by the author. University of Washington, Seattle.
22. Felsenstein, J. 1997. An alternating least-squares approach to inferring phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 46:101-111. (Pubitemid 127365610)
23. Fitch, W. M., and E. Margoliash. 1967. Construction of phylogenetic trees. Science 155:279-284.
24. Gascuel, O. 1994. A note on Sattath and Tversky's, Saitou and Nei's and Studier and Keppler's algorithms for inferring phylogenies from evolutionary distances. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:961-963. (Pubitemid 24349477)
25. Gascuel, O. 1997. BIONJ: An improved version of the NJ algorithm based on a simple model of sequence data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:685-695. (Pubitemid 27287289)
26. Gatesy, J., C. Matthee, R. DeSalle, and C. Hayashi. 2002. Resolution of a supertree/supermatrix paradox. Syst. Biol. 51:652-664. (Pubitemid 35180694)
27. Goloboff, P., J. Farris, and K. Nixon. 2003. TNT: Tree analysis using new technology. Distributed by the authors.
28. Guénoche, A., and S. Grandcolas. 1999. Approximations par arbre d'une distance partielle. Math. Inf. Sci. Humaines, 146:51-64.
29. Guindon, S., and O. Gascuel. 2003. A simple, fast and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 52:696-704. (Pubitemid 37365050)
30. Huelsenbeck, J. P. 2001. When are fossils better than extant taxa in phylogenetic analysis? Syst. Zool. 40:458-469.
31. Huelsenbeck, J. P. and F. Ronquist. 2001. MrBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754-755. (Pubitemid 32851390)
32. Huson, D. H., S. M. Nettles and T. J. Warnow. 1999. Disk-covering, a fast-converging method for phylogenetic tree reconstruction. J. Comp. Biol. 6:369-386.
33. Kearney, M. 2002. Fragmentary taxa, missing data, and ambiguity: Mistaken assumptions and conclusions. Syst. Biol. 51:369-381. (Pubitemid 35180714)
34. Kimura, M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16:111-120. (Pubitemid 11166431)
35. Kishino, H., T. Miyata, and M. Hasegawa. 1990. Maximum likelihood inference of protein phylogeny ans the origin of chloroplasts. J. Mol. Evol. 31:151-160. (Pubitemid 20261943)
36. Landry, P.-A., F.-J. Lapointe, and J. A. W. Kirsch. 1996. Estimating phylogenies from lacunose distance matrices: Additive is superior to ultrametric estimation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:818-823. (Pubitemid 26240086)
37. Lapointe, F.-J., and G. Cucumel. 1997. The average consensus procedure: Combination of weighted trees containing identical or overlapping sets of taxa. Syst. Biol. 46:306-312. (Pubitemid 127092068)
38. Lapointe, F.-J., J. A. W. Kirsch, and J. M. Hutcheon. 1999. Total evidence, consensus and bat phylogeny: A distance-based approach. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 11:55-66. (Pubitemid 129499252)
39. Lapointe, F.-J., and P.-A. Landry. 2001. A fast procedure for estimating missing distances in incomplete matrices prior to phylogenetic analysis. Pages 189-190 in Currents computational molecular biology (N. El-Mabrouk, T. Lengauer, D. Sankoff, eds.). Publications CRM, Montréal.
40. Lapointe, F.-J., and C. Levasseur. 2004. Everything you always wanted to know about the average consensus, and more. Pages 87-105 in Phylogenetic supertrees: Combining information to reveal the tree of life (O. R. P. Bininda-Emonds, ed.). Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
41. Lapointe, F.-J., M. Wilkinson, and D. Bryant. 2003. Matrix representation with parsimony or with distances: Two sides of the same coin? Syst. Biol. 52:865-868. (Pubitemid 38106054)
42. Levasseur, C, and F.-J. Lapointe. 2001. War and peace in phylogenetics: A rejoinder on total evidence and consensus. Syst. Biol. 50:881-891.
43. Luenberger, D. G. 1984. Linear and nonlinear programming. Addison-Wesley, London.
44. Madsen, O., M. Scally, C. J. Douady, D. J. Kao, R. W. DeBry, R. Adkins, H. M. Amrine, M. J. Stanhope, W. W. de Jong, and M. S. Springer. 2001. Parallel adaptive radiations in two major clades of placental mammals. Nature 409:610-614. (Pubitemid 32154811)
45. Mahon, S. A. 2004. A molecular supertree of the Artiodactyla. Pages 411-437 in Phylogenetic supertrees: Combining information to reveal the tree of life (O. R. P. Bininda-Emonds, ed.). Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
46. Makarenkov, V. 2001. TREX: Reconstructing and visualizing phylogenetic trees and reticulation networks. Bioinformatics 17:664-668. (Pubitemid 32707593)
47. Makarenkov, V., and F.-J. Lapointe. 2004. A weighted least-squares approach for inferring phylogenies from incomplete distance matrices. Bioinformatics 20:2113-2121. (Pubitemid 39236564)
48. Makarenkov, V., and B. Leclerc. 1999. An algorithm for the fitting of a phylogenetic tree according to a weighted least-squares criterion. J. Classif. 16:3-26.
49. Nei, M., and L. Jin. 1989. Variances of the average numbers of nucleotides substitutions within and between populations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 6:290-300.
50. Page, R. 2002. Modified mincut supertrees. Pages 537-552 in Lecture notes in computer science volume 2452 (R. Guigo and D. Gusfield, eds.).
51. Philippe, H., N. Lartillot, and H. Brinkmann. 2005. Multigene analyses of bilaterian animals corroborate the monophyly of Ecdysozoa, Lophotrochozoa, and Protostomia. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22:1246-1253. (Pubitemid 40577762)
52. Philippe, H., E. A. Snell, E. Bapteste, P. Lopez, P. W. H. Holland, and D. Casane. 2004. Phylogenomics of eukaryotes: Impact of missing data on large alignments. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1740-1752. (Pubitemid 39096890)
53. Piaggio-Talice, R., G. Burleigh and O. Eulenstein. 2004. Quartet supertrees. Pages 173-191 in Phylogenetic supertrees: Combining information to reveal the tree of life (O. R. P. Bininda-Emonds, ed.). Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
54. Price, S. A., O. R. P. Bininda-Emonds, and J. L. Gittleman. 2005. A complete phylogeny of the whales, dolphins and even-toed hoofed mammals (Cetartiodactyla). Biol. Rev. Comb. Philos. Soc. 80:445- 473.
55. Pupko, T, D. Huchon, Y. Cao, N. Okada, and M. Hasegawa. 2002. Combining multiple data sets in a likelihood analysis: Which models are the best? Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:2294-2307. (Pubitemid 35440463)
56. Ragan, M. A. 1992. Phylogenetic inference based on matrix representation of trees. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1:53-58.
57. Rambaut, A., and N. C. Grassly. 1997. SEQ-GEN: An application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees. Comp. Appl. Biosi. 13:235-238. (Pubitemid 27249927)
58. Robinson, D., and L. Foulds. 1979. Comparison of weighted labeled trees. Lect. Notes Math. 748:119-126.
59. Rodriguez, R., J. L. Oliver, A. Marin, and J. R. Medina. 1990. The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution. J. Theo. Biol. 142:485-501. (Pubitemid 20108270)
60. Ronquist, F. 1996. Matrix representation of trees, redundancy, and weighting. Syst. Biol. 45:247-253.
61. Saitou, N., and M. Nei. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:406-425.
62. Sanderson, M. J. 2003. Inferring absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times in the absence of molecular clock. Bioinformatics 19:301-302. (Pubitemid 36181923)
63. Schmidt, H. A. 2003. Phylogenetic Trees from Large Datasets. PhD thesis, Dusseldorf, Germany.
64. Schmidt, H. A., K. Strimmer, M. Vingron, and A. von Haeseler. 2002. TREE-PUZZLE: Maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis using quartets and parallel computing. Bioinformatics 18:502-504. (Pubitemid 34284960)
65. Semple, C, and M. Steel. 2000. A supertree method for rooted trees. Disc. Appl. Math. 105:147-158.
66. Shimodaira, H. 2002. An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. Syst. Biol. 51:492-508. (Pubitemid 35180700)
67. Steel, M. A., and D. Penny. 1993. Distribution of tree comparison metrics - Some new results. Syst. Biol. 42:126-141.
68. Strimmer, K., and A. von Haeseler. 1996. Quartet puzzling: A quartet maximum likelihood method for reconstructing tree topologies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:964-969. (Pubitemid 26284912)
69. Studier, J. A., and K. J. Keppler. 1988. A note on the neighbor-joining method of Saitou and Nei. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5:729-731.
70. Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachussetts.
71. Swofford, D. L., G. J. Olsen, P. J. Waddell, and D. M. HiUis. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. Pages 407-514 in Molecular systematics (D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable, eds.). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachussetts.
72. Waddell, P. J., H. Kishino, and R. Ota. 2002. Very fast algorithms for evaluating the stability of ML and Bayesian phylogenetic trees from sequence data. Genome Inform. 13:82-92.
73. Waddell, P. J., and S. Shelley. 2003. Evaluating placental inter-ordinal phylogenies with novel sequences including RAG1, γ-fibriogen, ND6, and mt-tRNA, plus MCMC-driven nucleotide, amino acid, and codon models. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 28:197-224. (Pubitemid 37435989)
74. Wiens, J. J. 1998. Does adding characters with missing data increase or decrease phylogenetic accuracy? Syst. Biol. 47:625-640. (Pubitemid 128370902)
75. Wiens, J. J., and T. W. Reeder. 1995. Combining data sets with different numbers of taxa for phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 44:548-558. (Pubitemid 126021228)
76. Yang, Z. 1996. Maximum-likelihood models for combined analysis of multiple sequence data. J. Mol. Evol. 42:587-596. (Pubitemid 26197149)