Matrix Representations with Parsimony or with Distances: Two Sides of the Same Coin?

Systematic Biology

Volumn 52, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 865-868

  Lapointe, François Joseph ^a   Wilkinson, Mark ^b   Bryant, David ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

^c MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; CLASSIFICATION; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; REVIEW; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; CLASSIFICATION; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 1642446507     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150390252297     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. BAUM, B. R. 1992. Combining trees as a way of combining data for phylogenetic inference, and the desirability of combining gene trees. Taxon 41:3-10.
2. BAUM, B. R., AND M. A. RAGAN. 1993. Reply to A. G. Rodrigo's "A comment on Baum's method for combining phylogenetic trees." Taxon 42:637-640.
3. BININDA-EMONDS, O. R. P. 2003. MRP supertree construction in the consensus setting. Pages 231-242 in Bioconsensus (M. Janowitz, F.-J. Lapointe, F. R. McMorris, B. Mirkin, and F. S. Roberts, eds.). American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island.
4. BININDA-EMONDS, O. R. P., J. L. GITTLEMAN, AND M. A. STEEL. 2002. The (super)tree of life: Procedures, problems and prospects. Annu Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33:265-289.
5. BRYANT, D. 2003. A classification of consensus methods for phylogenetics. Pages 163-183 in Bioconsensus (M. Janowitz, F.-J. Lapointe, F. R. McMorris, B. Mirkin, and F. S. Roberts, eds.). American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island.
6. BUNEMAN, P. 1971. The recovery of trees from measures of dissimilarity. Pages 387-395 in Mathematics in archeological and historical sciences (F. R. Hodson, D. G. Kendall, and P. Tautu, eds.). Edinburgh Univ. Press, Edinburgh, U.K.
7. CAVALLI-SFORZA, L. L., AND A. W. F. EDWARDS. 1967. Phylogenetic analysis: Models and estimation procedures. Evolution 32:550-570.
8. GORDON, A. D. 1986. Consensus supertrees: The synthesis of rooted trees containing overlapping sets of labeled leaves. J. Classif. 3:335-348.
9. LAPOINTE, F.-J. 1998. For consensus (with branch lengths). Pages 73-80 in Advances in data science and classification (A. Rizzi, M. Vichi, and H.-H. Bock, eds.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
10. LAPOINTE, F.-J., AND G. CUCUMEL. 1997. The average consensus procedure: Combination of weighted trees containing identical or overlapping sets of taxa. Syst. Biol. 46:306-312.
11. LAPOINTE, F.-J., AND J. A. W. KIRSCH. 2001. Construction and verification of a large phylogeny of marsupials. Aust. Mammal. 23: 9-22
12. LEVASSEUR, C., AND F.-J. LAPOINTE. 2002. A family of average consensus methods for weighted trees. Pages 355-369 in Classification, clustering and data analysis: Recent advances and applications (H.-H. Bock, K. Jajuga, and A. Sokolowski, eds.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
13. PURVIS, A. 1995. A modification to Baum and Ragan's method for combining phylogenetic trees. Syst. Biol. 44:251-255.
14. RAGAN, M. A. 1992. Phylogenetic inference based on matrix representations of trees. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1:53-58.
15. RONQUIST, F. 1996. Matrix representation of trees, redundancy, and weighting. Syst. Biol. 45:247-253.
16. SANDERSON, M. J., A. PURVIS, AND C. HENZE. 1998. Phylogenetic supertrees: Assembling the trees of life. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:105-109.
17. SWOFFORD, D. L., G. J. OLSEN, P. J. WADDELL, AND D. M. HILLIS. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. Pages 407-514 in Molecular systematics, 2nd edition (D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable, eds.). Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass achusetts.
18. THORLEY, J. L., AND M. WILKINSON. 2003. A view of supertree methods. Pages 185-193 in Bioconsensus (M. Janowitz, F.-J. Lapointe, F. R. McMorris, B. Mirkin, and F. S. Roberts, eds.). American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island.
19. WILKINSON, M., J. L. THORLEY, D. T. J. LITTLEWOOD, AND R. A. BRAY. 2001. Towards a phylogenetic supertree of Platyhelminthes? Pages 292-301 in Interrelationships of the Platyhelminthes (D. T. J. Littlewood and R. A. Bray, eds.). Taylor and Francis, London.
20. ZARETSKII, K. 1965. Constructing a tree on the basis of a set of distances between the hanging vertices. Usp. Math. Nauk 20:90-92 (in Russian).