Accounting for gene rate heterogeneity in phylogenetic inference

Systematic Biology

Volumn 56, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 194-205

  Bevan, Rachel B ^a   Bryant, David ^c   Lang, B Franz ^b  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

AIC; Gene rates; Phylogenetic integration; Phylogenomics; Rate heterogeneity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENE; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENES; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 34447253826     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150701291804     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Akaike, H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 19:716-723.
2. Bapteste, E., H. Brinkmann, J. A. Lee, D. V. Moore, C. W. Sensen, P. Gordon, L. Duruflé, T. Gaasterland, P. Lopez, M. Müller, and H. Philippe. 2002. The analysis of 100 genes supports the grouping of three highly divergent amoebae: Dictyostelium, Entamoeba, and Mastigamoeba. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 99:1414-1419. (Pubitemid 34136507)
3. Bevan, R. B., B. F. Lang, and D. Bryant. 2005. Calculating the evolutionary rates of different genes: A fast, accurate estimator with applications to maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 54:900-915.
4. Brinkmann, H., and H. Philippe. 1999. Archaea sister group of bacteria? Indications from tree reconstruction aftifacts in ancient phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16(6):817-825. (Pubitemid 29260835)
5. Brinkmann, H., M. van der Giezen, Y. Zhou, G. P. de Raucourt, and H. Philippe. 2005. An empirical assessment of long-branch attraction artefacts in deep eukaryotic phylogenomics. Syst. Biol. 54(5):743-757. (Pubitemid 43142294)
6. Bull, J., J. P. Huelsenbeck, C. W. Cunningham, D. L. Swofford, and P. J. Waddell. 1993. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42(3):384-397.
7. Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2003. Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach. Springer-Verlag, New York.
8. Collins, T. M., O. Fedrigo, and G. J. Naylor. 2005. Choosing the best genes for the job: The case for stationary genes in genome-scale phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 54:493-500. (Pubitemid 41040447)
9. Cranston, K., and B. Rannala. 2005. Closing the gap between rocks and clocks. Heredity 94:461-462. (Pubitemid 40641166)
10. Dacks, J. B., A. Marinets, W. F. Doolittle, T. Cavalier-Smith, and J. M. Logsdon Jr. 2002. Analyses of RNA polymerase II genes from free-living protists: Phylogeny, long branch attraction and the eukaryotic big bang. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:830-840. (Pubitemid 34602953)
11. Felsenstein, J. 2001 Taking variation of evolutionary rates between sites into account in inferring phylogenies. J. Mol. Evol. 53:447-455. (Pubitemid 32889552)
12. Felsenstein, J. 2004. Pages 537-538 in Inferring phylogenies. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
13. Foster, P. G. 2004. Modeling compositional heterogeneity. Syst. Biol. 53:485-495. (Pubitemid 38958537)
14. Gontcharov, A. A., B. Marin, and M. Melkonian. 2004. Are combined analyses better than single gene phylogenies? A case study using SSU rDNA and rbcL sequence comparisons in the Zygnematophyceae (Streptophyta). Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:612-624. (Pubitemid 38339677)
15. Guindon, S., and O. Gascuel. 2003. A simple, fast and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 52:696-704. (Pubitemid 37365050)
16. Harlow, T. J., J. P. Gogarten, and M. A. Ragan. 2004. A hybrid clustering approach to recognition of protein families in 114 microbial genomes. BMC Bioinformat. 5:1-14.
17. Hirt, R. P., J. M. Logsdon Jr., B. Healy, M. W. Dorey, W. F. Doolittle, and T. M. Embley. 1999. Microsporidia are related to fungi: Evidence from the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II and other proteins. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 96:580-585. (Pubitemid 29061251)
18. Huelsenbeck, J. P., J. Bull, and C. W. Cunningham. 1996. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Tree 11:152-158. (Pubitemid 126403403)
19. Lockhart, P. J., A. W. D. Larkum, M. A. Steel, P. J. Waddell, and D. Penny. 1996. Evolution of chlorophyll and bacteriochlorophyll: The problem of invariant sites in sequence analysis. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 93:1930-1934. (Pubitemid 26079857)
20. Madsen, O., M. Scally, C. J. Douady, D. J. Kao, R. W. DeBry, R. Adkins, H. M. Amrine, M. J. Stanhope, W. W. de Jong, and M. S. Springer. 2001. Parallel adaptive radiations in two major clades of placental mammals. Nature 409:610-614. (Pubitemid 32154811)
21. Mayrose, I., N. Friedman, and T. Pupko. 2005. A Gamma mixture model better accounts for among site rate heterogeneity. Bioinformatics 21:ii151-ii158 (Pubitemid 41535442)
22. Murphy, W. J., E. Eizirik, W. E. Johnson, Y. P. Zhang, O. A. Ryder, and S. J. O'Brien. 2001. Molecular phylogenetics and the origins of placental mammals. Nature 409:614-618. (Pubitemid 32154812)
23. Nylander, J. A. A., F. Ronquist, J. P. Huelsenbeck, and J. L. Nieves-Aldrey. 2004. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of combined data. Syst. Biol. 53:47-67. (Pubitemid 38370420)
24. Philippe, H., Y. Zhou, H. Brinkmann, N. Rodrigue, and F. Delsuc. 2005. Heterotachy and long-branch attraction in phylogenetics. BMC Evol. Biol. 5:1-8.
25. Phillips, M., F. Delsuc, and D. Penny. 2004. Genome-scale phylogeny and the detection of systematic biases. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1455-1458. (Pubitemid 38823748)
26. Pupko, T., D. Huchon, Y. Cao, N. Okada, and M. Hasegawa. 2002. Combining multiple data sets in a likelihood analysis: Which models are the best? Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:2294-2307. (Pubitemid 35440463)
27. Rokas, A., and S. B. Carroll. 2005. More genes of more taxa? the relative contribution of gene number and taxon number to phylogenetic accuracy. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22:1337-1344. (Pubitemid 40577772)
28. Rokas, A., B. L. Williams, N. King, and S. B. Carroll. 2003. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 425:798-804. (Pubitemid 37355944)
29. Smyth, P. 2000. Model selection for probabilistic clustering using cross-validated likelihood. Stat. Comput. 10:63-72.
30. Springer, M. S., M. J. Stanhope, O. Madsen, and W. W. de Jong. 2004. Molecules consolidate the placental mammal tree. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:430-438. (Pubitemid 38991669)
31. Yang, Z. 1996. Maximum-likelihood models for combined analyses of multiple sequence data. J. Mol. Evol. 42:587-596. (Pubitemid 26197149)