Evaluating tributary restoration potential for pacific salmon recovery

Ecological Applications

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 1068-1086

  Budy, Phaedra ^a   Schaller, Howard ^b  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b US Fish and Wildlife Service   (United States)

Author keywords

Conservation; Habitat; Population viability; Salmon; Stream restoration; Survival

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL MODELING; FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEM; HABITAT RESTORATION; LIFE CYCLE; POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS; RECOVERY; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; SALMONID; STREAMWATER; SURVIVAL; TRIBUTARY;

ANIMALIA; ONCORHYNCHUS;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ECOSYSTEM; LIFE CYCLE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SALMON;

ANIMALS; ECOSYSTEM; LIFE CYCLE STAGES; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SALMON;

EID: 34447116976     PISSN: 10510761     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/06-0022     Document Type: Article

References (102)

1. Akçakaya, H. R., and J. L. Atwood. 1997. A habitat model of the California Gnatcatcher. Conservation Biology 11:422-434.
2. Allan, J. D., and A. S. Flecker. 1993. Biodiversity conservation in running waters. BioScience 43:32-43.
3. Anthony, R. G., et al. 2006. Status and trend in demography of Northern Spotted Owls, 1985-2003. Wildlife Monographs 163:1-78.
4. Bauer, S. B., and S. C. Ralph. 2001. Strengthening the use of aquatic habitat indicators in Clean Water Act programs. Fisheries 26:14-24.
5. Beamesderfer, R. C. P., H. A. Schaller, M. P. Zimmerman, C. E. Petrosky, O. P. Langness, and L. LaVoy. 1997. Spawner-recruit data for spring and summer Chinook salmon populations in Idaho, Oregon, and Washington. Section 2.1, pages 1-78 in D. R. Marmorek and C. Peters, compilers and editors. 1998. Plan for analyzing and testing hypotheses (PATH): retrospective and prospective analyses of spring/summer Chinook in FY 1997. ESSA Technologies, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
6. Beechie, T. J., and S. Bolton. 1999. An approach to restoring salmonid habitat-forming processes in the Pacific Northwest watersheds. Fisheries 24:6-15.
7. Berggren, T., H. Franzoni, L. Basham, P. Wilson, H. Schaller, C. Petrosky, K. Ryding, E. Weber, and R. Boyce. 2005. Comparative survival study (CSS) of PIT-tagged spring/summer Chinook. 2003/04 Annual Report, migration years 1997-2002, mark-recapture activities and bootstrap analysis. Prepared by Fish Passage Center and Comparative Survival Study Oversight Committee representing the Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Agencies and Columbia Basin Tribes. 〈http://www.fpc.org/documents/CSS/final_2003_CSS_AnnualReport. pdf〉
8. Bernhardt, E. S., et al. 2005. Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts. Science 308:636-637.
9. Bond, N. R., and P. S. Lake. 2003. Local habitat restoration in streams: constraints on the effectiveness of restoration for stream biota. Ecological Management and Restoration 4:3-198.
10. Bowler, P. A. 2000. Ecological restoration of coastal sage scrub and its potential role in habitat conservation plans. Environmental Management 26(Supplement 1):85-96.
11. Budy, P., G. P. Thiede, N. Bouwes, C. Petrosky, and H. Schaller. 2002. Evidence linking delayed mortality of Snake River salmon to their earlier hydrosystem experience. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22:35-51.
12. Caswell, H. 2000. Matrix population models. Second edition. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
13. Cedarholm, C. J., R. E. Bilby, P. A. Bisson, T. W. Bumstead, B. R. Fransen, W. J. Scarlett, and J. W. Ward. 1997. Response of juvenile coho salmon and steelhead to placement of large woody debris in a coastal Washington stream. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 17:947-963.
14. Cederholm, C. J., M. Kunze, T. Murota, and A. Sibatani. 1999. Pacific salmon carcasses: Essential contributions of nutrients and energy for aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Fisheries 24(10):6-15.
15. Clinton, W. J., and A. Gore, Jr. 1993. The forest plan for a sustainable economy and a sustainable environment. Appendix A in E. T. Tuchmann, K. P. Connaughton, L. E. Freedman, and C. B. Moriwaki, 1996. The Northwest forest plan: a report to the President and Congress. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of Forestry and Economic Assistance, Washington, D.C., USA.
16. Crouse, D. T., L. B. Crowder, and H. Caswell. 1987. A stage-based population model for loggerhead sea turtles and implications for conservation. Ecology 68:1412-1423.
17. Deriso, R. B., D. R. Marmorek, and I. J. Parnell. 2001. Retrospective patterns of differential mortality and common year effects experienced by spring and summer Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) of the Columbia River. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58:2419-2430.
18. Doak, D. F. 1995. Source-sink models and the problem of habitat degradation: general models and applications to the Yellowstone grizzly. Conservation Biology 9:1370-1379.
19. Dynesius, M., and C. Nilsson. 1994. Fragmentation and flow regulation of river systems in the northern third of the world. Science 266:753-762.
20. Efron, B., and R. J. Tibshirani. 1993. An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA.
21. Fagan, W. F., C. M. Kennedy, and P. J. Unmack. 2005. Quantifying rarity, losses, and risks for native fishes of the lower Colorado River Basin: implications for conservation listing. Conservation Biology 19:1872-1882.
22. Federal Caucus. 2000. Conservation of Columbia Basin fish: final basinwide salmon recovery strategy. Bonneville Power Administration, U.S. Department of Energy, Portland, Oregon, USA.
23. Feist, B. E., E. A. Steel, G. R. Pess, and R. E. Bilby. 2003. The influence of scale on salmon habitat restoration priorities. Animal Conservation 6:271-282.
24. Franklin, A. B., D. R. Anderson, R. J. Gutierrez, and K. P. Burnham. 2000. Climate, habitat quality, and fitness in Northern Spotted Owl populations in northwestern California. Ecological Monographs 70:539-590.
25. Frissell, C. A., and R. K. Nawa. 1992. Incidence and causes of physical failure of artificial habitat structure in streams of Oregon and Washington. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 12:182-197.
26. GAO (U.S. Government Accounting Office). 2002. Columbia River Basin salmon and steelhead: Federal agencies recovery responsibilities, expenditures, and actions. GAO Technical Report GAO-02-612.
27. Glen, D. 2001. Recovery of juvenile Atlantic salmon populations following the easing of man-made obstacles on the River Tweed, Scotland. Pages 64-78 in M. Hertz, editor. Proceedings of the workshop. Protection and restoration of salmon habitat: lessons learned around the world. Atlantic Salmon Federation, Brunswick, Maine, USA. 〈http://www.mainesalmonrivers.org/ Pages/Salmon%20restoration%20symposium%20I-III.pdf〉
28. Good, T. P., R. S. Waples, and P. Adams, editors. 2005. Updated status of Federally listed ESUs of West Coast salmon and steelhead. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, NOAA Technical Memorandum, NMFS-NWFSC-66.
29. Greene, C. M., and T. J. Beechie. 2004. Consequences of potential density-dependent mechanisms on recovery of ocean-type Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 61:500-602.
30. Gresh, T., J. Lichatowich, and P. Schoonmaker. 2000. An estimation of historic and current levels of salmon production in the northeast Pacific ecosystem: evidence of a nutrient deficit in the freshwater systems of the Pacific Northwest. Fisheries 25:15-22.
31. Healey, M., P. Kline, and C. Tsai. 2001. Saving the endangered Formosa landlocked salmon. Fisheries 26(4):6-14.
32. Hendry, A. P., B. H. Letcher, and G. Gries. 2002. Estimating natural selection acting on stream-dwelling Atlantic Salmon: implications for the restoration of extirpated populations. Conservation Biology 17:795-805.
33. ICBTRT (Interior Columbia Basin Technical Recovery Team). 2005. Interior Columbia Basin TRT: viability criteria for application to interior Columbia Basin salmonid ESUs. Draft, July 2005. National Marine Fisheries Service. [unpublished document] 〈http://www.nwfsc.noaa.gov/trt/col_docs/ viabilityupdatememo.pdf〉
34. IDFG (Idaho Department of Fish and Game). 2005. Idaho Fish and Game Anadromous Fish Screening Program. 〈http://www.townstate.com/screenshop/ 〉
35. IEAB (Independent Economic Analysis Board). 2005. Economic effects from Columbia River Basin anadromous salmonid fish production. Document IEAB 2005-1. Power Planning Division, Northwest Power and Conservation Council, Portland, Oregon, USA. 〈http://www.nwcouncil.org/library/ieab/ieab2005-1.htm〉
36. ISAB (Independent Scientific Advisory Board). 2003. Decision support models as tools for developing management strategies: examples from the Columbia River Basin. Pages 233-244 in R. C. Wissmar and P. A. Bisson, editors. Strategies for restoring river ecosystems: sources of variability and uncertainty in natural and managed systems. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
37. ISG (Independent Scientific Group). 1999. Return to the river: scientific issues in the restoration of salmonid fishes in the Columbia River. Fisheries 24(3):10-19.
38. Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project [ICBEMP]. 2000. Interior Columbia Basin Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement. ICBEMP, Boise, Idaho, USA. 〈http://icbemp.gov/〉
39. Juracek, K., and F. Fitzpatrick. 2004. Limitations and implications of stream classification. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 39:659-670.
40. Karieva, P., M. Marvier, and M. McClure. 2000. Recovery and management options for spring/summer Chinook salmon in the Columbia River Basin. Science 290:977-979.
41. Kauffman, J. B., R. L. Beschta, and N. Otting. 1997. An ecological perspective of riparian and stream restoration in the western United States. Fisheries 22(5):12-24.
42. Kauffman, B., A. S. Thorpe, and E. N. J. Brookshire. 2004. Livestock exclusion and belowground ecosystem responses in riparian meadows of eastern Oregon. Ecological Applications 14:1671-1679.
43. Kondolf, G. M. 1993. Lag in stream channel adjustment to livestock exclosure, White Mountains, California. Restoration Ecology 1:226-230.
44. Laikre, L., editor. 1999. Conservation genetic management of brown Trout (Salmo trutta) in Europe. Report by the European Union Fisheries and Agriculture Research (FAIR) project "Concerted action on identification, management and exploitation of genetic resources in the brown trout (Salmo trutta)." TROUTCONCERT; EU FAIR CT97-3882. 〈http://www.fs.fed.us/ rm/boise/publications/BTWorkshop/Conservation%20genetics%20of%20BrnT%20Europe. pdf〉
45. Lake, P. S. 2001. Maturing of restoration: linking ecological research and restoration. Ecological Management and Restoration 2:110-115.
46. Lamberson, R. H., R. McKelvey, B. S. Noon, and C. Voss. 1992. A dynamic analysis of Northern Spotted Owl viability in a fragmented forest landscape. Conservation Biology 6:505-512.
47. Larsen, D. P., P. R. Kaufmann, T. M. Kincaid, and N. S. Urquhart. 2004. Detecting persistent changes in the habitat of salmon-bearing streams in the Pacific Northwest. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 61:283-291.
48. Lee, D., J. Sedell, B. Rieman, R. Thurow, and J. Williams. 1997. Broad scale assessment of aquatic species and habitats. An assessment of ecosystem components in the interior Columbia Basin and portions of the Klamath and Great basins. Volume 3, chapter 4. U.S. Forest Service, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-405.
49. Lepori, F., D. Palm, E. Brännäs, and B. Malmqvist. 2005. Does restoration of structural heterogeneity in streams enhance fish and macroinvertebrate diversity? Ecological Applications 15:2060-2071.
50. Levin, P. S., S. Achord, B. E. Feist, and R. W. Zabel. 2002. Non-indigenous brook trout and the demise of threatened Snake River salmon: a forgotten threat? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 269:1663-1670.
51. Lichatowich, J. A. 1999. Salmon without rivers: a history of the Pacific salmon crisis. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
52. Maki-Petays, A., T. Muotka, A. Huusko, P. Tikkanen, and P. Kreivi. 1997. Seasonal changes in habitat use and preference by juvenile brown trout, Salmo trutta, in a northern boreal stream. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54:520-530.
53. Mangel, M., P. Levin, and A. Patil. 2006. Using life history and persistence criteria to prioritize habitats for management and conservation. Ecological Applications 16:797-806.
54. Mantua, N. J., S. R. Hare, Y. Zhang, J. M. Wallace, and R. C. Francis. 1997. A Pacific interdecadal climate oscillation with impacts on salmon production. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 78:1069-1079.
55. McClure, M. M., E. E. Holmes, B. L. Sanderson, and C. E. Jordan. 2003. A large-scale, multispecies status assessment: anadromous salmonids in the Columbia River Basin. Ecological Applications 13:964-989.
56. McElhany, P., et al. 2003. Interim report on viability criteria for Willamette and Lower Columbia Pacific salmonids. Willamette/Lower Columbia technical recovery team. Northwestern Fisheries Science Center, Seattle, Washington, USA. 〈http://www.nwfsc.noaa.gov/trt/wlc_viabrpt/complete. pdf〉
57. McHugh, P., P. Budy, and H. Schaller. 2004. A model-based assessment of the potential response of Snake River spring/summer Chinook salmon to habitat improvements. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 133:622-638.
58. McKelvey, K., B. R. Noon, and R. H. Lamberson. 1992. Conservation planning for species occupying fragmented landscapes: the case of the Northern Spotted Owl. Pages 424-450 in P. M. Kareiva, J. G. Kingsolver, and R. B. Huey, editors. Biotic interactions and global change. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
59. Mobrand, L., and L. Lestelle. 1997. Application of the ecosystem diagnosis and treatment method to the Grande Ronde Model Watershed Project. Bonneville Power Administration, U.S. Department of Energy, Public Information Center, Portland, Oregon, USA. 〈http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/ product.biblio.jsp?osti_id=654056〉
60. Mobrand, L. E., J. A. Lichatowich, L. C. Lestelle, and T. S. Vogel. 1997. An approach to describing ecosystem performance "through the eyes of the salmon." Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54:2964-2973.
61. Montgomery, D. R. 2004. Geology, geomorphology, and the restoration ecology of salmon. GSA Today 14:4-12.
62. Morely, S. A., and J. R. Karr. 2002. Assessing and restoring the health of urban streams in the Puget Sound Basin. Conservation Biology 16:1498-1509.
63. Morita, K., and S. Yamamoto. 2002. Effects of habitat fragmentation by damming on the persistence of stream-dwelling charr populations. Conservation Biology 16:1318-1323.
64. Morris, W. F., and D. F. Doak. 2002. Quantitative conservation biology: theory and practice of population viability analysis. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
65. Nehlsen, W., J. E. Williams, and J. A. Lichatowich. 1991. Pacific salmon at the crossroads: stocks at risk from California, Oregon, Idaho, and Washington. Fisheries 16(2):4-21.
66. NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service). 2004. Operation of the Federal Columbia River Power System (FCRPS) including 19 Bureau of Reclamation projects in the Columbia Basin. (Revised and reissued pursuant to court order, NWF v. NMFS, Civ. No. CV-01-640-RE (D. Oregon)). Bonneville Power Administration, U.S. Department of Energy, Portland, Oregon, USA. 〈www.salmonrecovery.gov/ R_biop_final_shtml〉
67. Norris, K. 2004. Managing threatened species: the ecological toolbox, evolutionary theory, and declining populations paradigm. Journal of Applied Ecology 41:413-426.
68. Noss, R. F., H. B. Quigley, M. G. Hornocker, T. Merrill, and P. C. Paquet. 1996. Conservation biology and carnivore conservation in the Rocky Mountains. Conservation Biology 10:949-963.
69. NRC (National Research Council). 1992. Restoration of aquatic ecosystems: science, technology, and public policy. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
70. NRC (National Research Council). 1995. Science and the Endangered Species Act. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
71. NRC (National Research Council). 1996. Upstream and society in the Pacific Northwest. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
72. O'Grady, M. 2001. Salmonid riverine habitat restoration in the Republic of Ireland. Pages 82-87 in M. Hertz, editor. Proceedings of the workshop. Protection and restoration of salmon habitat: lessons learned around the world. Available from Atlantic Salmon Federation, Brunswick, Maine, USA. 〈www.mainesalmonrivers.org/pages/Salmon%20restoration%20symposium%20I-III. pdf〉
73. Oosterhout, G., P. Wilson, C. Petrosky, P. Budy, N. Bouwes, E. Tinus, G. Thiede, and H. Schaller. 2000. A technical review of the National Marine Fisheries Service Leslie matrix model of Snake River spring and summer Chinook populations. STUFA: State, Tribal, and U.S. Fisheries Agencies. Seattle, Washington, USA 〈http://www.fws.gov/columbiariver/pdfdocs/conservation/ leslie.pdf〉
74. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. 1996. Fish screening. Backgrounder [newsletter], 26 January, pp. 1-4. 〈http://www.dfw.state.or. us/ODFWhtml/InfoCntrFish/PDFs/BKGFishScreen.pdf〉
75. Palmer, M. A., et al. 2005. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:208-217.
76. Paulsen, C. M., and T. R. Fisher. 2001. Statistical relationship between summer parr-to-smolt survival of spring-summer Chinook salmon and indices of land use. Transactions of American Fisheries Society 130:347-358.
77. Peters, C. N., and D. R. Marmorek. 2001. Application of decision analysis to evaluate recovery actions for threatened Snake River spring and summer Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58:2431-2446.
78. Petrosky, C. E., H. A. Schaller, and P. Budy. 2001. Evaluation of survival trends in the freshwater spawning and rearing life stage for Snake River spring/summer Chinook. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58:1196-1207.
79. Rabeni, C. F., and S. P. Sowa. 1996. Integrating biological realisms into habitat restoration and conservation strategies for small streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53(Supplement 1):252-259.
80. Register-Guard. 2005. Second-class salmon: Bush plan cuts critical habitat by 80 percent. Editorial. 20 August 2005. Online edition, p. A14. 〈http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/registerguard/search.html〉
81. Reid, T., and D. D. Murphy. 1995. Providing a regional context for local conservation action. In Science and biodiversity policy. BioScience 45(Supplement):S84-S90.
82. Reimichen, T. E. 2000. Some ecological and evolutionary aspects of bear-salmon interactions in coastal British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Zoology 78:448-457.
83. Reyes-Gavilán, F. G., R. Garrido, A. G. Nicieza, M. M. Toledo, and F. Braña. 1996. Fish community variation along physical gradients in short streams of northern Spain and the disruptive effect of dams. Hydrobiologia 321:155-163.
84. Ricciardi, A., and J. B. Rasmussen. 1999. Extinction rates of North American freshwater fauna. Conservation Biology 13:1220-1222.
85. Rieman, B., J. T. Peterson, J. Clayton, P. Howell, R. Thurow, W. Thompson, and D. Lee. 2001. Evaluation of potential effects of federal land management alternatives on trends of salmonids and their habitats in the interior Columbia River basin. Forest Ecology and Management 153:43-62.
86. Roni, R., L. A. Weitkamp, and J. Scordina. 1999. Identification of essential fish habitat for salmon in the Pacific Northwest: initial efforts, information needs and future directions. Pages 93-107 in L. R. Benaka, editor. Fish habitat: essential fish habitat and rehabilitation. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
87. Roper, B., J. J. Dose, and J. E. Williams. 1997. Stream restoration: Is fisheries biology enough? Fisheries 22:6-11.
88. Ruckelshaus, M. H., P. S. Levin, J. B. Johnson, and P. M. Kareiva. 2002. The Pacific salmon wars: what science brings to the challenge of recovering species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 3:665-706.
89. Schaller, H. A., C. E. Petrosky, and O. P. Langness. 1999. Contrasting patterns of productivity and survival rates for stream-type Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) populations of the Snake and Columbia rivers. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 56:1031-1045.
90. Schindler, D. E., M. D. Scheuerell, J. W. Moore, S. M. Gende, T. B. Francis, and W. J. Palen. 2003. Pacific salmon and the ecology of coastal ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology 1:31-37.
91. Schreck, C. B., T. P. Stahl, L. E. Davis, D. D. Roby, and B. J. Clemens. 2006. Mortality estimates of juvenile spring-summer Chinook salmon in the Lower Columbia River and estuary, 1992-1998: evidence for delayed mortality? Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 135:457-475.
92. Shaffer, M. L. 1992. Keeping the grizzly bear in the American west: a strategy for real recovery. The Wilderness Society, Washington, D.C., USA.
93. Soulé, M. E. 1985. What is conservation biology? BioScience 35:727-734.
94. Thomas, J. W., E. D. Forsman, J. B. Lint, E. C. Meslow, B. R. Noon, and J. Verner. 1990. A conservation strategy for Northern Spotted Owl: report to the inter-agency science committee to address conservation of Northern Spotted Owl. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., USA.
95. Thompson, W. L., and D. C. Lee. 2000. Modeling relationships between landscape-level attributes and snorkel counts of Chinook salmon and steelhead counts of Chinook salmon and steelhead parr in Idaho. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57:1834-1842.
96. Turner, M. G., G. J. Arthaud, R. T. Engstrom, S. J. Hejl, J. Liu, S. Loeb, and K. McKelvey. 1995. Usefulness of spatially explicit population models in land management. Ecological Applications 5:12-16.
97. Williams, J. G., S. G. Smith, R. W. Zabel, W. D. Muir, M. D. Scheuerell, B. D. Sandford, D. M. Marsh, R. A. McNatt, and S. Achord. 2005. Effects of the federal Columbia River power system on salmonid populations. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-63. U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C., USA. 〈http://www.nwfsc.noaa.gov/publications/displatallinfo.cfm?docmetadataid= 6061〉
98. Wilson, M. F., and K. C. Halupka. 1995. Anadromous fish as a keystone species in vertebrate communities. Conservation Biology 9:489-497.
99. Wilson, P. H. 2003. Using population projection matrices to evaluate recovery strategies for Snake River Spring and Summer Chinook Salmon. Conservation Biology 17:782-794.
100. Wipfli, M.S., J. Hudson, and J. Caouette. 1998. Influence of salmon carcasses on stream productivity: response of biofilm and benthic macroinvertebrates in southeastern Alaska, USA. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55:1503-11.
101. Wissmar, R. C., and P. A. Bisson. 2003. Strategies for restoring rivers: problems and opportunities. Pages 254-262 in R. C. Wissmar and P. A. Bisson, editors. Strategies for restoring river ecosystems: sources of variability and uncertainty in natural and managed systems. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
102. Zabel, R. W., M. D. Scheuerell, M. M. McClure, and J. G. Williams. 2006. The interplay between climate variability and density dependence in the population viability of Chinook salmon. Conservation Biology 20:190-200.