Strengthening the use of aquatic habitat indicators in clean water act programs

Fisheries

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 14-25

  Bauer, Stephen B ^a   Ralph, Stephen C ^b  

^a Pocket Water Inc   (United States)

^b U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035381383     PISSN: 03632415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8446(2001)026<0014:STUOAH>2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Armantrout, N. B. 1998. Glossary of aquatic habitat inventory terminology. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
2. Bain, M. B., T. C. Hughes, and K. K. Arend. 1999. Trends in methods for assessing freshwater habitats. Fisheries 24(4):16-21.
3. Bain, M. B., and N. J. Stevenson. 1999. Aquatic habitat assessment: common methods. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
4. Barbour, M.T., J. Gerritsen, B.D. Snyder, and J.B. Stribling. 1999. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish, second edition. EPA 841-B-99-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Water: Washington, D.C.
5. Bauer, S., and S. Ralph. 1999. Aquatic habitat indicators and their application to water quality objectives within the Clean Water Act. U.S. EPA 910-R-99-014, Seattle, Washington.
6. Beechie, T. J., and T. H. Sibley. 1997. Relationships between channel characteristics, woody debris, and fish habitat in northwestern Washington streams. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 126:217-229.
7. Berg, N., A. Carlson, and D. Azuma. 1998. Function and dynamics of woody debris in stream reaches in the central Sierra Nevada, California. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55:1807-1820.
8. Bilby, R. E., and P. A. Bisson. 1998. Function and distribution of large woody debris. Pages 324-346 in R. J. Naiman, and R. E. Bilby, eds. River ecology and management: lessons from the Pacific coastal ecoregion. Springer, New York.
9. Bjornn, T. C., and D. W. Reiser. 1991. Habitat requirements of salmonids in streams. Pages 83-138 in W. R. Meehan, ed. Influences of forest and rangeland management on salmonid fishes and their habitats. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 19.
10. Booth, D. B., and L. Reinelt. 1993. Consequences of urbanization on aquatic systems - measured effects, degradation thresholds, and corrective strategies. In Proceedings of the watershed '93 conference. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, EPA-840-R-94-002, Washington, D.C.
11. Bovee, K. D. 1982. A guide to stream habitat analysis using the instream flow incremental methodology. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-82/26, Washington, D.C.
12. Bunte, K., and L. H. MacDonald. 1995. Detecting change in sediment loads: where and how is it possible? In W. R. Osterkamp, ed. Effects of scale on interpretation and management of sediment and water quality. Proceedings of a Boulder symposium. International Association of Hydrological Sciences, Publication 226, Wallingford, UK.
13. Bunte, K., and L. H. MacDonald. 1999. Scale considerations and the detectability of sedimentary cumulative watershed effects. National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Technical Bulletin 776, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
14. Castro, J., and F. Reckendorf. 1995. Effects of sediment on the aquatic environment: potential NRCS actions to improve aquatic habitat. Natural Resources Conservation Service & Oregon State University, Working Paper 6, Corvallis, Oregon.
15. Chamberlin, T. W., R. D. Harr, and F. H. Everest. 1991. Timber harvesting, silviculture and watershed processes. Pages 181-206 in W. R. Meehan, ed. Influences of forest and rangeland management on salmonid fishes and their habitats. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 19.
16. Chapman, D. W. 1988. Critical review of variables used to define effects of fines in redds of large salmonids. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 117:1-21.
17. CRITFC (Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission). 1995. Estimation of the environmental impact of increased water temperature on freshwater life stages of selected salmon and trout of the Columbia River Tributaries. Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission, Portland, Oregon.
18. DeVries, P. 1997. Riverine salmonid egg burial depths: review of published data and implications for scour studies. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54:1685-1698.
19. Dunne, T., and L. B. Leopold. 1978. Water in environmental planning. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, California
20. Edwards, T. K., and G. D. Glysson. 1999. Field methods for measurement of fluvial sediment. techniques of water-resources investigations of the U. S. Geological Survey. Book 3, applications of hydraulics, Chapter C2. U. S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.
21. Elmore, W., and R. Beschta. 1987. Riparian areas: perceptions in management. Rangelands 9:260-265.
22. Everest, F. H., R. L. Beschta, and J. S. Scrivener. 1987. Fine sediment and salmonid production: a paradox. Pages 98-142 in E. O. Salo and T. W. Cundy, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. University of Washington, Institute of Forest Resources, Contribution 57, Seattle, Washington.
23. Gregory, S. V., and P. A. Bisson. 1997. Degradation and loss of anadromous salmonid habitat in the Pacific Northwest. Pages 277-314 in D. J. Stouder, P. A. Bisson, and R. J. Naiman, eds. Pacific salmon and their ecosystems. Chapman and Hall, New York.
24. Harrelson, C. C., C. L. Rawlins, and J. P. Potyondy. 1994. Stream channel reference sites: an illustrated guide to field technique. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, General Technical Report RM-245, Fort Collins, Colorado.
25. Hauer, F. R., G. C. Poole, J. T. Gangemi, and C. V. Baxter. 1999. Large woody debris in bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) spawning streams of logged and wilderness watersheds in northwest Montana. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 56:915-924.
26. Havis, R. N., C. V. Alonso, J. G. King, and R. F. Thurow. 1993. A mathematical model of salmonid spawning habitat. Water Resources Bulletin 29:435-44.
27. Hill, M. T., W. S. Platts, and R. L. Beschta. 1991. Ecological and geomorphological concepts for instream and out of channel flow requirements. Rivers 2:198-210
28. Houck, O. A. 1997a. TMDLs: The resurrection of water quality standards-based regulation under the Clean Water Act. Environmental Law Report 27:10329-10344.
29. _. 1997b. TMDLs: Are we there yet? The long road toward water quality-based regulation under the Clean Water Act. Environmental Law Report 27:10391-10401.
30. Johnson, P.A. and T.M. Heil. 1996. Uncertainty in estimating bankfull conditions. Water Resources Bulletin. 32:1283-1291.
31. Klein, R. D. 1992. Sediment flux, fine sediment intrusion and gravel permeability in a coastal stream, Northwestern California. Advances in Hydro-Science and Engineering, S. S. Wang, ed. Vol. 1: 273-280.
32. _. 1997. Critically annotated bibliography to support EPA's sediment TMDL protocol. Review Draft of June 11, 1997. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. under EPA Contract #68-C3-0303. EPA Region 9, San Francisco, CA.
33. Kondolf, G. M. 2000. Assessing salmonid spawning gravel quality. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129:262-281.
34. Konkel, G.W. and J.D. McIntyre. 1987. Trends in spawning populations of Pacific anadromous salmonids. U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Fish and Wildlife Technical Report 9, Washington, D.C.
35. Leopold, L. B., M. G. Wolman and J. P. Miller. 1964. Fluvial processes in geomorphology. Dover Publications, Inc. New York.
36. Lisle, T. E. 1987. Overview; channel morphology and sediment transport in steepland streams. Pages 287-297 in R. L. Beschta, T. Blinn, G. E. Grant, G. G. Ice, and F. J. Swanson, eds. Erosion and sedimentation in the Pacific Rim, Proceedings of the Corvallis symposium. International Association of Hydrological Sciences, Publication 165, Wallingford, U.K.
37. Madej, M. A., and V. L. Ozaki. 1996. Channel response to sediment wave propagation and movement, Redwood Creek, California, USA. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 21:911-927.
38. May, C. W., E. B. Welch, R. R. Horner, J. R. Karr, and B. W. Mar. 1997. Quality indices for urbanization effects in Puget Sound lowland streams. University of Washington, Department of Civil Engineering, Water Resources Series, Technical Report, prepared for the Washington Department of Ecology, through the Centennial Clean Water Fund, Seattle, Washington.
39. McCullough, D. A. 1999. Monitoring of stream-bank stability and streamside vegetation in a livestock exclosure on the Warm Springs River, Oregon: comparison of ground-based surveys with aerial photographic analysis. Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission, Portland, Oregon.
40. McIntosh, B. A., D. M. Price, C. E. Torgersen, and H. W. Li. 1995. Distribution, habitat utilization, movement patterns, and the use of thermal refugia by spring chinook in the Grande Ronde, Imnaha, and John Day Basins. Bonneville Power Administration, Project #88-108, Portland, Oregon.
41. McIntosh, B. A., J. R. Seddell, R. F. Thurow, S. E. Clarke, and G. L. Chandler. 2000. Historical changes in pool habitats in the Columbia River Basin. Ecological Applications 10(5):1478-1496.
42. Nawa, R. K. and C. A. Frissell. 1993. Measuring scour and fill of gravel streambeds with scour chains and sliding-bead monitors. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 13:634-639.
43. Nehlsen, W. 1997. Pacific salmon status and trends - a coastwide perspective. Pages 41-52 in D. J. Stouder, P. A. Bisson, and R. J. Naiman, eds. Pacific salmon and their ecosystems. Chapman and Hall, New York.
44. Nehlsen, W., J. E. Williams, and J. A. Lichatowich. 1991. Pacific salmon at the crossroads: stock at risk from California, Oregon, Idaho and Washington. Fisheries 16(2):4-21.
45. Newcombe, C. P., and J. O. T. Jensen. 1996. Channel suspended sediment and fisheries: a synthesis of quantitative assessment of risk and impact. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 16:693-727.
46. NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service). 1996. Making Endangered Species Act determinations of effect for individual or grouped actions at the watershed scale. National Marine Fisheries Service, Environmental and Technical Division, Portland, Oregon.
47. Olson-Rutz, K. M., and C. B. Marlow. 1992. Analysis and interpretation of stream channel cross-sectional data. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 12:55-61.
48. Orsborn, J. F., and S. C. Ralph. 1995. An aquatic resource assessment of the Dungeness River system: Phase II - physical channel analysis, hydrology, and hydraulics, and Phase III - fisheries habitat survey. Prepared for the Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe, Sequim, Washington.
49. Orth, D. J. 1987. Ecological considerations in the development and application of instream flow-habitat models. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 1:171-181.
50. Pfankuch, D. J. 1975. Stream reach inventory and channel stability evaluation. U.S. Forest Service, Northern Region, Missoula, Montana.
51. Platts, W. S. 1991. Livestock grazing. Pages 389-423 in W. R. Meehan, ed. Influences of forest and rangeland management on salmonid fishes and their habitats. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 19.
52. Platts, W. S., and 13 co-authors. 1987. Methods for evaluating riparian habitats with applications to management. U.S. Department of Agriculture.