The Pacific salmon wars: What science brings to the challenge of recovering species

Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics

Volumn 33, Issue , 2002, Pages 665-706

  Ruckelshaus, Mary H ^a   Levin, Phil ^a   Johnson, Jerald B ^a   Kareiva, Peter M ^b  

^a ALASKA FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b THE NATURE CONSERVANCY   (United States)

Author keywords

Conservation units; Endangered Species Act; Recovery planning; Scenarios; Science policy interface

Indexed keywords

SALMONID; SPECIES CONSERVATION;

ARENA; ONCORHYNCHUS; SALMONIDAE;

EID: 0036914358     PISSN: 00664162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150504     Document Type: Review

References (204)

1. Achord S, Eppard MB, Hockersmith EE, Standford BP, Matthews GM. 1997. Monitoring the migrations of wild Snake River spring/summer chinook salmon smolts 1996. Bonneville Power Admin. Rep. Proj. 91-028, Portland, OR
2. Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Thompson WL. 2000. Null hypothesis testing: Problems, prevalence, and an alternative. J. Wildl. Manag. 64:912-23
3. Avise JC. 1989. A role for molecular genetics in the recognition and conservation of endangered species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 4:29-281
4. Bahls P, Ereth M. 1994. Stream Typing Error in Washington Water Type Maps for Watersheds of Hood Canal and Southwest Olympic Peninsula. Tech. Rep. 94-2. Point-No-Point Treaty Counc., Kingston, Wash.
5. Barlow GW. 1995. The Relevance of Behavior and Natural History to Evolutionarily Significant Units. See Nielsen 1995, pp. 169-75
6. Beamesderfer RC, Ward DL, Nigro AA. 1996. Evaluation of the biological basis for a predator control program on northern squawfish (Ptychocheilus oregonensis) in the Columbia and Snake rivers. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 53:2898-908
7. Beamish RJ, Noakes DJ, McFarlane GA, Klyashtorin L, Ivanov VV, Kurashov V. 1999. The regime concept and natural trends in the production of Pacific salmon. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56:516-26
8. Beckham SD. 1977. The Indians of Western Oregon: This Land was Theirs. Coos Bay, OR: Arago Books
9. Bednarek AT. 2001. Undamming rivers: A review of the ecological impacts of dam removal. Environ. Manag. 27:803-14
10. Beechie TJ, Beamer E, Collins B, Benda L. 1996. Restoration of habitat-forming processes in Pacific Northwest watersheds: A locally adaptable approach to salmonid habitat restoration. In The Role of Restoration in Ecosystem Management, ed. DL Peterson, CV Klimas, pp. 48-67. Madison, WI: Soc. Ecol. Restor.
11. Beechie TJ, Beamer E, Wasserman L. 1994. Estimating coho salmon rearing habitat and smolt production losses in a large river basin, and implications for restoration. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 14:797-811
12. Beechie TJ, Bolton S. 1999. An approach to restoring salmonid habitat-forming processes in Pacific Northwest watersheds. Fisheries 24:6-15
13. Beechie TJ, Roni R, Steel EA. 2002. Ecosystem Recovery Planning for Listed Salmon: An Integrated Assessment Approach for Salmon Habitat. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-NWFSC, Northwest Fish. Sci. Cent., Seattle, WA. In press
14. Beissinger SR, McCullough DR, eds. 2002. Population Viability Analysis. Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago Press
15. Bilby RE, Fransen BR, Bisson PA. 1996. Incorporation of nitrogen and carbon from spawning coho salmon into the trophic system of small streams: Evidence from stable isotopes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 53(1):164-73
16. Bilby RE, Fransen BR, Bisson PA, Walter JK. 1998. Response of juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) and steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) to the addition of salmon carcasses to two streams in southwestern Washington, U.S.A. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55:1090-118
17. Boersma PD, Kareiva PM, Fagan WF, Clark JA, Hoekstra JM. 2001. How good are endangered species recovery plans? BioScience 51:643-49
18. Botkin D, Peterson D, Calhoun J. 2000. The scientific basis for validation monitoring of salmon for conservation and restoration plans. Olympic Nat. Resource Cent. Tech. Rep., Forks, WA
19. Bowen BW 1998. What is wrong with ESUs? The gap between evolutionary theory and conservation principles. J. Shellfish Res. 17:1355-58
20. Bowen BW. 1999. Preserving genes, species, or ecosystems? Healing the fractured foundations of conservation policy. Mol. Ecol. 8:S5-10
21. Boyle B. 2002. Restoring credibility to government science. Seattle Times, Feb. 27
22. Bradford MJ, Irvine JR. 2000. Land use, fishing, climate change, and the decline of Thompson River, British Columbia, coho salmon. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 57:13-16
23. Brick P, Snow D, Van De Wetering S. 2001. Across the Great Divide. Explorations in Collaborative Conservation and the American West. Washington, DC: Island
24. Brodeur RD, Boehlert GW, Casillas E, Eldridge MB, Helle JH, et al. 2000. A coordinated research plan for estuarine and ocean research on Pacific Salmon. Fisheries 25(6):7-16
25. Brook BW, O'Grady J, Chapman A, Burgman M, Akcakaya HR, Frankham R. 2000. Predictive accuracy of population viability analysis in conservation biology. Nature 404:385-86
26. Brown B. 1983. Mountain in the Clouds: A Search for the Wild Salmon. Seattle: Univ. Wash. Press. 249 pp.
27. Buchanan DV, Hooton RM, Moring JR. 1981. Northern squawfish (Ptychocheilus oregonensis) predation on juvenile salmonids in sections of the Willamette River Basin, Oregon. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 38:360-64
28. Budy P, Thiede GP, Bouwes N, Petrosky CE, Schaller H. 2002. Evidence linking delayed mortality of Snake River salmon to their earlier hydrosystem experience. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 22:35-51
29. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. 1998. Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. New York: Springer-Verlag
30. Busby PJ, Wainwright TC, Bryant GJ, Lierheimer LJ, Waples RS, et al. 1996. Status Review of West Coast Steelhead from Washington, Idaho, Oregon, and California. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-NWFSC-27. Northwest Fish. Sci. Cent., Seattle, WA
31. Busby PJ, Wainwright TC, Waples RS. 1994. Status Review for Klamath Mountains Province Steelhead. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-NWFSC-19. Northwest Fish. Sci. Cent., Seattle, WA
32. Clark JS, Carpenter SR, Barber M, Collins S, Dobson A, et al. 2001. Ecological forecasts: An emerging imperative. Science 293:657-60
33. Collings MR, Smith RW, Higgins GT. 1972. Hydrology of four streams in western Washington as related to several Pacific salmon species: Humptulips, Elochoman, Green and Wynoochee rivers. U.S. Geol. Serv. Open File Rep., Tacoma, Wash.
34. Collis K, Roby DD, Craig D, Ryan BA, Ledgerwood RD. 2001, Colonial waterbird predation on juvenile salmonids tagged with passive integrated transponders in the Columbia River estuary: Vulnerability of different salmonid species, stocks, and rearing types. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 130:385-96
35. Cone J. 1995. A Common Fate: Endangered Salmon and the People of the Pacific Northwest. Corvallis: Oregon State Univ. Press
36. Cone J, Ridlington S, eds. 1996. The Northwest Salmon Crisis: A Documented History. Corvallis: Oregon State Univ. Press
37. Connelly M. 2001. Home is where they'll lay me down. Orion (Summer):17-25
38. Cooney RT, Brodeur RD. 1998. Carrying capacity and North Pacific salmon production: Stock enhancement implications. Bull. Mar. Sci. 62:443-64
39. Craig JK, Foote CJ. 2001. Countergradient variation and secondary sexual color: Phenotypic convergence promotes genetic divergence in carotenoid use between sympatric anadromous and nonanadromous morphs of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Evolution 55:380-91
40. Crandall KA, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Mace GM, Wayne RK. 2000. Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:290-95
41. Dalton R. 2002. Fur flies over lynx survey's suspect samples. Nature 415:107
42. Doremus H. 2000. Delisting endangered species: An aspirational goal, not a realistc expectation. Environ. Law Rep. 30:10434
43. Fed. Regist. 1996. Policy regarding the recognition of distinct vertebrate population segments under the Endangered Species Act. Fed. Regist. 61:4721-25
44. Fed. Regist. 2002. Endangered and threatened species: Findings on petitions to delist Pacific salmonid ESUs. CFR Fed. Regist. 50:223-26.67(28)
45. Feist BE, Steel EA, Pess GR, Bilby RE. 2002. What is the correct scale for habitat analyses aimed at prioritizing restoration efforts for salmon? Anim. Conserv. In review
46. Finney BP, Eaves G, Sweetman I, Douglas J, Smol MSV. 2000. Impacts of climatic change and fishing on Pacific salmon abundance over the past 300 years. Science 290:795-99
47. Flagg TA, Berejikian BA, Colt JE, Dickhoff WW, Harrell LW, et al., eds. 2000. Ecological and Behavioral Impacts of Artificial Production Strategies on the Abundance of Wild Salmon Populations - A Review of Practices in the Pacific Northwest. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-NWFSC-4, Northwest Fish. Sci. Cent., Seattle, WA
48. Fleming IA, Gross MR. 1993. Breeding success of hatchery and wild coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) in competition. Ecol. Appl. 3:230-45
49. Ford MJ. 1998. Testing models of migration and isolation among populations of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tschawytscha). Evolution 52:539-57
50. Ford MJ, Budy P, Busack C, Chapman D, Cooney T, et al. 2001. Upper Columbia River Steelhead and Spring Chinook Salmon Population Structure and Biological Requirements. http://www.nwfsc.noaa.gov/
51. Frank BJR. 2002. Salmon need better habitat. Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Jan. 11
52. Fraser DJ, Bernatchez L. 2001. Adaptive evolutionary conservation: Towards a unified concept for defining conservation units. Mol. Ecol. 10:2741-52
53. Friesen TA, Ward DL. 1999. Management of northern pikeminnow and implications for juvenile salmonid survival in the lower Columbia and Snake rivers. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 19:1008-19
54. Frissell CA, Nawa RK. 1992. Incidence and causes of physical failure of artificial habitat structures in streams of western Oregon and Washington. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 12:182-97
55. Gearin P, Pfeifer R, Jeffries S, Delong R. 1989. California sea lion predation depletes a steelhead run in Washington State. Proc. Bien. Conf. Biol. Mar. Mammals, Dec. 7-11, Pacific Grove, CA (Abstr.)
56. Gearin P, Pfeifer R, Jeffries S, Delong R, Johnson M. 1988. Results of the 1986-87 California sea lion-steelhead trout predation control program at the Hiram M. Chittenden Locks. Seattle, WA: NMFS Northwest Alaska Fish. Cent. Process, Rep. 88-30. 111 pp.
57. Glova GJ. 1984. Management implications of the distribution and diet of sympatric populations of juvenile coho salmon and coastal cutthroat trout in small streams in British Columbia, Canada. Prog. Fish Cult. 46:269-77
58. Gore AJR. 1992. Earth in the Balance. Ecology and the Human Spirit. New York: Penguin
59. Gresh T, Lichatowich J, Schoonmaker P. 2000, An estimation of historic and current levels of salmon production in the northeast Pacific ecosystem. Fisheries 25:15-21
60. Groot C, Margolis L. 1991. Pacific Salmon Life Histories. Vancouver: Univ. Br. Columbia Press
61. Groves C. 2000. Designing a Geography of Hope: A Practitioner's Handbook to Ecoregional Conservation Planning. Washington, DC: The Nat. Conserv. Press
62. Gustafson RG, Wainwright TC, Winans GA, Waknitz FW, Parker LT, Waples RS. 1997. Status Review of Sockeye Salmon from Washington and Oregon. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-NWFSC-33. Northwest Fish. Sci. Cent., Seattle, WA
63. Hard JJ. 2002a. Case study of Pacific salmon. In Fisheries-Induced Adaptive Change, ed. U Dieckmann, OR Godø, M Heino, J Mork. Cambridge, UK. In press
64. Hard JJ. 2002b. Response of chinook salmon life history to selection under harvest. In Salmonid Perspectives on Evolution, ed. A Hendry, S Stearns. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ, Press. In press
65. Hard JJ, Kope RG, Grant WS, Waknitz FS, Parker LT, Waples RS. 1996. Status Review of Pink Salmon from Washington, Oregon, and California. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-NWFSC-25. Northwest Fish. Sci. Cent., Seattle, WA
66. Healey MC. 1986. Optimum size and age at maturity in Pacific salmon and effects of size-selective fisheries. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 89:39-52
67. Healey MC, 1991. Diets and feeding rates of juvenile pink, chum and sockeye salmon in Hecate Strait, British Columbia. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 120:303-18
68. Hendry AP. 2000. Rapid evolution of reproductive isolation in the wild: Evidence from introduced salmon. Science 290:516-18
69. Hilborn R. 1992. Hatcheries and the future of salmon in the Northwest. Fisheries 17:5-8
70. Hilborn R, Mangel M. 1997. The Ecological Detective. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
71. Hollowed AB, Hare SR, Wooster WS. 2001. Pacific Basin climate variability and patterns of Northeast Pacific Marine fish production. Prog. Oceanogr. 49:257-82
72. Holmes EE. 2001. Estimating risks in declining populations with poor data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:5072-77
73. Holmes EE, Fagan WF. 2002. Validating population viability analyses for corrupted data sets. Ecology In press
74. Independent Sci. Advis. Board (ISAB), 2001a. A Review of Salmon Recovery Strategies for the Columbia River Basin, ISAB Rep. 2001-7. Northwest Power Plan. Counc., Portland, OR
75. Independent Sci, Advis. Board (ISAB). 2001b. ISAB Model Synthesis Report. An Analysis of Decision Support Tools Used in Columbia River Basin Salmon Management. ISAB Rep. 2001-1a. Northwest Power Plan. Counc., Portland, OR
76. Independent Sci. Group (ISG). 1996. Return to the River: Restoration of Salmonid Fishes in the Columbia River Ecosystem. Northwest Power Plan. Counc., Portland, OR
77. Independent Sci. Group (ISG). 1999. Scientific issues in the restoration of salmonid fishes in the Columbia River. Fisheries 24:10-19
78. Interagency Sci. Salmon Team (ISST). 2001. Identified Research Needs for Salmon Recovery. 15 pp.
79. Johannesson K. 2001. Parallel speciation: A key to sympatric divergence. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:148-53
80. Kareiva PM, Andelman S, Doak D, Elderd B, Groom M, et al. 1998. Using Science in Habitat Conservation Plans. http://www.nceas. ucsb.edu/projects/hcp
81. Kareiva PM, Marvier M, McClure M. 2000. Recovery and management options for spring/summer chinook salmon in the Columbia River Basin. Science 270:977-79
82. Kinnison MT, Bentzen P, Unwin MJ, Quinn TP. 2002. Reconstructing recent divergence: Evaluating nonequilibrium population structure in New Zealand Chinook salmon. Mol. Ecol. 11:739-54
83. Kinzig AP, Carpenter S, Dove M, Heal G, Levin S, et al. 2000. Nature and Society: An Imperative for Integrated Environmental Research. http://lsweb.la.asu/akinzig/NSFReport.pdf
84. Lande R. 1993. Risks of population extinction from demographic and environmental stochasticity and random catastrophes. Am. Nat. 142:911-27
85. Lande R, Shannon S. 1996. The role of genetic variation in adaptation and population persistence in a changing environment. Evolution 50:434-37
86. Larkin G, Slaney PA. 1997. Implications of trends in marine-derived nutrient influx to south coastal British Columbia salmonid production. Fisheries 22(11):16-24
87. Lawson PW. 1993. Cycles in ocean productivity, trends in habitat quality, and the restoration of salmon runs in Oregon. Fisheries 18:6-10
88. Levin PS, Achord S, Feist B, Zabel RW. 2002. Non-indigenous brook trout and the demise of threatened Snake River salmon: A forgotten threat? Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B. 269:1663-70
89. Levin PS, Schiewe MH, 2001. Preserving salmon biodiversity. Am. Sci. 89:220-27
90. Levin PS, Tolimieri N. 2001. Differences in the impacts of dams on the dynamics of salmon populations. Anim. Conserv. 4:291-99
91. Levin PS, Williams JG. 2002. Interspecific effects of artifically propagated fish: An additional conservation risk for salmon. Conserv. Biol. In press
92. Levin PS, Zabel RW, Williams JG, 2001. The road to extinction is paved with good intentions: Negative associations of fish hatcheries with threatened salmon. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 268:1-6
93. Lichatowich J. 1999. Salmon Without Rivers. Washington, DC: Island
94. Lynch M, Lande R. 1993. Evolution and extinction in response to environmental change. In Biotic Interactions and Global Change, ed. P Kareiva, JG Kingsolver, RB Huey, pp. 234-50. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer
95. Mahnken C, Ruggerone G, Waknitz W, Flagg T. 1998. A historical perspective on salmonid production from Pacific Rim hatcheries. North Pac. Anadromous Fish. Comm. Bull. 1:38-53
96. Mantua NJ, Hare SR, Zhang Y, Wallace JM, Francis RC. 1997. A Pacific interdecadal climate oscillation with impacts on salmon production. Am. Meteor. Soc. Bull. 78:1069-79
97. Mapes LV. 2001. Lynx-fur furor focuses on science role. Seattle Times, Dec. 30
98. Mayden RL, Wood RM. 1995. Systematics, Species Concepts, and the Evolutionarily Significant Unit in Biodiversity and Conservation Biology. See Nielsen 1995, pp. 58-113
99. McClure MM, Cooney T, Marvier M. 2001. Assessing the role of dams in salmon recovery. Hydro Rev. 20:36-45
100. McClure MM, Holmes EE, Sanderson BL, Jordan CE. 2002. A large-scale, multi-species assessment: Anadromous salmonids in the Columbia River Basin. Ecol. Appl. In press
101. McCusker MR, Parkinson E, Taylor EB. 2000. Mitochondrial DNA variation in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) across its native range: Testing biogeographical hypotheses and their relevance to conservation. Mol. Ecol. 9:2089-108
102. McElhany P, Ruckelshaus MH, Ford MJ, Wainwright T, Bjorkstedt E. 2000. Viable Salmonid Populations and the Recovery of Evolutionarily Significant Units. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-NWFSC-42. Washington, DC: US Dep. Comm. 156 pp.
103. McFarlane GA, King JR, Beamish RJ. 2000. Have there been recent changes in climate? Ask the fish. Prog. Oceanogr. 47:147-69
104. Meffe GK. 1992. Techno-arrogance and halfway technologies: Salmon hatcheries on the Pacific coast of North America. Conserv. Biol. 6:350-54
105. Millenium Ecosyst. Assess. (MA). 2001. Objectives, Audience, Process and Conceptual Framework. Presented at MA Tech. Design Workshop, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
106. Mills LS. 2002. False samples are not the same as blind controls. Nature 415:471
107. Milstein M. 2002. Fish, lynx flubs hit agencies' credibility. The Oregonian, Feb. 5
108. Moritz C. 1994. Defining "evolutionarily significant units" for conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9:373-75
109. Moritz C. 2002. Strategies to protect biodiversity and the evolutionary processes that sustain it. Syst. Biol. 51:238-54
110. Morris W, Doak D, Groom M, Kareiva PM, Fieberg J, et al. 1999. A Practical Handbook for Population Viability Analysis. Washington, DC: The Nat. Conserv.
111. Moyle PB, Li HW, Barton BA. 1986. The Frankenstein Effect: Impact of Introduced Fishes on Native Fishes in North America, pp. 415-26. Bethesda, MD: Am. Fish. Soc.
112. Myers J, Busack C, Rawding D. 2002. Identifying Historical Populations of Chinook and Chum Salmon and Steelhead with the Lower Columbia River and Upper Willamette River Evolutionarily Significant Units. Willamette/Lower Columbia River Tech. Recovery Team. Tech. Rev. Draft
113. Myers JM, Kope RG, Bryant GJ, Teel D, Lierheimer LJ, et al. 1998. Status Review of Chinook Salmon from Washington, Idaho, Oregon, and California. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-NWFSC-35. Northwest Fish. Sci. Cent., Seattle, WA
114. Mysak LA. 1986. El Nino, interannual variability and fisheries in the northeast Pacific ocean. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 43:464-97
115. Nash CE, Iwamoto RN, Mahnken CVW. 2000. Aquaculture risk management and marine mammal interactions in the Pacific Northwest. Aquaculture 183:307-23
116. Natl. Mar. Fish. Serv. (NMFS). 1991. Notice of policy: Policy on applying the definition of species under the Endangered Species Act to Pacific salmon. Fed. Regist. 56:58612-16
117. Natl. Mar. Fish. Serv. (NMFS). 1995. Biological Opinion for Reinitiation of Consultation on 1994-1998 Operation of the Federal Columbia River Power System and Juvenile Transportation Program in 1995 and Future Years. NMFS Northwest Reg., Portland, OR
118. Natl. Mar. Fish. Serv. (NMFS). 1996. Making ESA Determinations of Effect for Individual or Grouped Actions at the Watershed Scale. Environ. Tech. Serv Div., Habitat Conserv. Branch, Portland, OR
119. Natl. Mar. Fish. Serv. (NMFS). 2000a. Recovery Planning Guidance for Technical Recovery Teams. http://www.nwfsc.noaa.gov/cbd/trt/about.htm
120. Natl. Mar. Fish. Serv. (NMFS). 2000b. Reinitiation of Consultation on Operation of the Federal Columbia River Power System, Including the Juvenile Fish Transportation Program, and 19 Bureau of Reclamation Projects in the Columbia Basin. Seattle, WA
121. Natl. Mar. Fish. Serv. (NMFS). 2000c. Predation on Salmonids Relative to the Federal Columbia River Power System. Northwest Fish. Sci. Cent., Seattle, WA
122. Natl. Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 1997. Impacts of California Sea Lions and Pacific Harbor Seals on Salmonids and on the Coastal Ecosystems of Washington, Oregon and California. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-NWFSC-28. Northwest Fish. Sci. Cent., Seattle, WA
123. Natl. Res. Counc. (NRC), ed. 1995. Science and the Endangered Species Act. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
124. Natl. Res. Counc. (NRC), ed. 1996. Upstream: Salmon and Society in the Pacific Northwest. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
125. Natl. Res. Counc. (NRC), ed. 1998. Improving Fish Stock Assessments. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
126. Natl. Res. Counc. (NRC). 2002. Scientific Evaluation of Biological Opinions on Endangered and Threatened Fishes in the Klamath River Basin: Interim Report. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
127. Nehlsen W, Williams JE, Lichatowich JA. 1991. Pacific salmon at the crossroads: Stocks at risk from California, Oregon, Idaho and Washington. Fisheries 16(2):4-21
128. Nicholas JW, Hankin DG. 1988. Chinook Salmon Populations in Oregon Coastal River Basins: Description of Life Histories and Assessment of Recent Trends in Run Strengths, Fish. Div. Inf. Rep., No. 88-1. Portland, OR: Oreg, Dep, Fish Wildl. 359 pp.
129. Nielsen JL, ed, 1995. Evolution and the aquatic ecosystem: Defining unique units in population conservation. Proc. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp., 17th. Bethesda, MD: Am. Fish. Soc.
130. Nielsen JL, Fountain MC, Wright JM. 1997. Biogeographical analysis of Pacific trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in California and Mexico based on mitochondrial DNA and nuclear microsatellites. In Molecular Systematics of Fishes, ed. TD Kocher, CA Stepien, pp. 53-69. New York: Academic
131. Northwest Power Plan. Counc. (NWPPC). 2001. 20th Annual Report of the Pacific Northwest Electric Power and Conservation Planning Council. Counc. Doc. 2001-3. Northwest Power Plan. Counc., Portland, OR
132. Pac. Salmon Comm. (PSC). 1997. Incidental Fishing Mortality of Chinook Salmon: Mortality Rates Applicable to Pacific Salmon Commission Fisheries. Rep. TCCHINOOK (97) 1. Vancouver, BC, Can.: Pac. Salmon Comm.
133. Pac. Salmon Comm. (PSC). 2001a. Catch and Escapement of Chinook Salmon Under Pacific Salmon Commission Jurisdiction 1997-2000. Rep. TCCHINOOK (01)-1. Vancouver, BC, Can.: Pac. Salmon Comm.
134. Pac. Salmon Comm. (PSC). 2001b. Annual Exploitation Rate Analysis and Model Calibration. Rep. TCCHINOOK (01)-2. Vancouver, BC, Can.: Pac. Salmon Comm.
135. Pascual M, Bentzen P, Rossi CR, Mackey G, Kinnison MT, Walker R. 2001. First documented case of anadromy in a population of introduced rainbow trout in Patagonia, Argentina. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 130:53-67
136. Paulsen CM, Fisher TR. 2001. Statistical relationship between parr-to-smolt survival of Snake River spring-summer chinook salmon and indices of land use. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 130:347-58
137. Pearcy WG. 1992. Ocean Ecology of North Pacific Salmonids. Seattle, WA: Wash. Sea Grant
138. Pess GR, Montgomery DR, Steel EA, Bilby RE, Feist BE, Greenberg HM. 2002. Landscape characteristics, land use, and coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) abundance, Snohomish River, Wash. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 59:613-23
139. Poe TP, Shively RS, Tabor RA, 1994. Ecological Consequences of Introduced Piscivorous Fishes in the Lower Columbia and Snake Rivers. See Stouder et al. 1994, pp. 347-60
140. Puget Sound Tech. Recovery Team (PSTRT). 2001. Independent Populations of Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in Puget Sound. Public Rev. Draft NMFS, Seattle, WA. http://www.nwfsc.noaa.gov/ cbd/trt/popid.pdf
141. Quigley TM, Arbelbide SJ, eds. 1997. An Assessment of Ecosystem Components in the Interior Columbia Basin and Portions of the Klamath and Great Basins. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-405. Pac. Northwest Res. Stn., Portland, OR
142. Quinn TP, Kinnison MT, Unwin MJ. 2001. Evolution of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) populations in New Zealand: Pattern, rate, and process. Genetica 113:493-513
143. Quinn TP, Unwin MJ, Kinnison MT. 2000. Evolution of temporal isolation in the wild: Genetic divergence in timing of migration and breeding by introduced Chinook salmon populations. Evolution 54:1372-85
144. Ratner S, Lande R. 2001. Demographic and evolutionary responses to selective harvesting in populations with discrete generations. Ecology 82(11):3093-104
145. Raymond HL. 1988. Effects of hydroelectric development and fisheries enhancement on spring and summer chinook salmon and steelhead in the Columbia River Basin. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 8:1-24
146. Recovery Sci. Rev. Panel (RSRP). 2000. Report from the RSRP Meeting Held Dec. 3-4. http://www.nwfsc.noaa.gov/cbd/trt/rsrpdoc2.pdf
147. Recovery Sci. Rev. Panel (RSRP). 2001. Report from the RSRP Meeting Held March 13-14. http://www.nwfsc.noaa.gov/cbd/trt/rsrp_mar01.pdf
148. Reeves GH, Everest FH, Nickelson TE. 1989. Identification of Physical Habitats Limiting the Production of Coho Salmon in Western Oregon and Washington. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-245, Pac. Northwest Res. Stn., Portland, OR
149. Reeves GH, Hall JD, Roelofs TD, Hickman TL, Baker CO. 1991. Rehabilitating and modifying stream habitats. In Influences of Forest and Rangeland Management on Salmonid Fishes and Their Habitats, ed. WR Meehan, pp. 519-57. Bethesda, MD: Am. Fish. Soc.
150. Regetz J. 2002. Landscape-level constraints on recruitment of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in the Columbia River basin, USA. Aquat. Conserv. In press
151. Reid WV. 2000. Ecosystem data to guide hard choices. Issues Sci. Tech. http://www.nap.edu/issues/
152. Reimers PE. 1973. The Length of Residence of Juvenile Fall Chinook Salmon in Sixes River, Oregon. Oregon Fish Comm. Res. Rep. 4(2). Portland: Oregon Dep. Fish Wildl. 43 pp.
153. Reisenbichler RR, Rubin SP. 1999. Genetic changes from artificial propagation of Pacific salmon affect the productivity and viability of supplemented populations. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 56:459-66
154. Ricker WE. 1995. Trends in the average size of Pacific salmon in Canadian catches. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 121:593-602
155. Rieman BE, Beamesderfer RC, Vigg S, Poe TP. 1991. Estimated loss of juvenile salmonids to predation by Northern Squawfish, Walleyes, and Smallmouth Bass in John Day Reservoir, Columbia River. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 120:448-58
156. Rohlf DJ. 1989. The Endangered Species Act: A Guide to Its Protections and Implementation. Stanford, CA: Stanford Environ. Law Soc.
157. Ruckelshaus MH, McElhany P, Ford MJ. 2002. Recovering species of conservation concern: Are populations expendable? In The Importance of Species: Setting Conservation Priorities, pp. 305-29, ed. PM Kareiva, S Levin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. In press
158. Ruggerone GT. 1986. Consumption of migrating juvenile salmonids by gulls foraging below a Columbia River dam. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 115:736-42
159. Ryder OA. 1986. Species conservation and systematics: The dilemma of subspecies. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1:9-10
160. Sala OE, Chapin FS III, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, et al. 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770-74
161. Schaller HA, Petrosky CE, Langness OP. 1999. Contrasting patterns of productivity and survival rates for stream-type chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) populations of the Snake and Columbia Rivers. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56:1031-45
162. Schluter D. 1998. Ecological causes of speciation. In Endless Forms: Species and Speciation, ed. DJ Howard, SH Berlocher, pp. 114-29. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
163. Seattle Times. 2002. Leery of grizzly tests, legislator demands review of all endangered-species studies. Seattle Times, Jan. 10
164. Simberloff DS. 2000. Nonindigenous species: A global threat to biodiversity and stability. In Nature and Human Society: The Quest for a Sustainable World, ed. P Raven, T Williams, pp. 325-34. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
165. Smith C. 1979. Salmon Fishers of the Columbia. Corvallis: Oregon State Univ. Press
166. Smith CJ, Castle P. 1994. Puget Sound Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) Escapement Estimates and Methods - 1991. Washington Dep. Fish Wildl. Proj. Rep. Ser. No. 1. Wash. Dep. Fish. Wildl., Olympia, WA
167. Smith CT, Nelson RJ, Wood CC, Koop BF. 2001. Glacial biogeography of North American coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Mol. Ecol. 10:2775-85
168. Stokstad E. 2002. Fur flies over charges of misconduct. Science 295:250-51
169. Storfer A. 1996. Quantitative genetics: A promising approach for the assessment of genetic variation in endangered species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:343-48
170. Stouder DJ, Bisson PA, Naiman RJ, eds. 1996. Pacific Salmon and Their Ecosystems: Status and Future Options. New York: Chapman & Hall
171. Stouder DJ, Fresh KL, Feller RJ, eds. 1994. Theory and Application in Fish Feeding Ecology. Columbia: Univ. SC Press
172. Strassel KA. 2002. The missing lynx. The Wall Street J., Jan. 24
173. Tallman RF, Healey MC. 1991. Phenotypic differentiation in seasonal ecotypes of chum salmon, Oncorhynchus keta. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 48:661-71
174. Tallman RF, Healey MC. 1994. Homing, straying, and gene flow among seasonally separated populations of chum salmon. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 51:577-88
175. Taylor EB. 1991. A review of local adaptation in Salmonidae, with particular reference to Atlantic and Pacific salmon. Aquaculture 98:185-207
176. Tear TH, Scott JM, Hayward PH, Griffith B. 1993. Status and prospects for success of the Endangered Species Act: A look at recovery plans. Science 262:976-97
177. Tear TH, Scott JM, Hayward PH, Griffith B. 1995. Recovery plans and the Endangered Species Act: Are criticisms supported by data? Conserv. Biol. 9:182-95
178. Teel DJ, Milner GB, Winans GA, Grant WS. 2000. Genetic population structure and origin of life history types in Chinook salmon in British Columbia, Canada. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 129:194-209
179. US v. Washington. The Boldt Decision. 384 F. Suppl. 312; 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12291
180. Utter F, Milner G, Ståhl G, Teel D. 1989. Genetic population structure of Chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, in the Pacific Northwest. Fish. Bull. 87:239-64
181. Verhovek SH. 2002. "Saving" wild salmon's bucket-born cousins, New York Times, Feb. 4
182. Vitousek PM. 1994. Beyond global warming: Ecology and global change. Ecology 75:1861-76
183. Waples RS. 1991. Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) and the definition of"species" under the Endangered Species Act. Mar. Fish. Rev. 53:11-22
184. Waples RS. 1995. Evolutionarily Significant Units and the Conservation of Biological Diversity Under the Endangered Species Act. See Nielsen 1995, pp. 8-27
185. Waples RS. 1998. Separating the wheat from the chaff: Patterns of genetic differentiation in high gene flow species. J. Hered. 89:438-50
186. Waples RS. 1999. Dispelling some myths about hatcheries. Fisheries 24:12-21
187. Waples RW, Ford MJ, Schmitt D. 2002. Empirical results of salmon supplementation: A preliminary assessment. In Ecological and Genetic Implications of Aquaculture Activities, ed. T Bert. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic. In press
188. Waples RW, Gustafson RG, Weitkamp LA, Myers JM, Johnson OW, Busby PJ, et al. 2001. Characterizing diversity in salmon from the Pacific Northwest. J. Fish Biol. 59(Suppl. A):1-41
189. Wash. Dep. Fish Wildl. Point-No-Point Treaty tribes (WDFW & PNPTT). 2000. Summer Chum Salmon Conservation Initiative. An Implementation Plan to Recover Summer Chum in the Hood Canal and Strait of Juan de Fuca Region. Olympia, WA: WDFW. 424 pp.
190. Wash. Dep. Fish Wildl. West. Wash. Treaty Indian Tribes (WDFW & WWTIT). 1993. 1992 Washington State Salmon and Steelhead Stock Inventory. West. Wash. Treaty Indian Tribes. Olympia, WA: WDFW
191. Weber B, 2002. Wildlife society clarifies its role in lynx studies. The Wall Street J., Feb. 12
192. Weitkamp LA, Wainwright TC, Bryant GJ, Milner GB, Teel DJ, et al. 1995. Status Review of Coho salmon from Washington, Oregon, and California. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFSNWFSC-24. Northwest Fish. Sci. Cent., Seattle, WA
193. Welch DW, Ward BR, Smith BD, Eveson JP. 2000. Temporal and spatial responses of British Columbia steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) populations to ocean climate shifts. Fish. Oceanogr. 9:17-32
194. Williams JG, Smith SG, Muir WD. 2001. Survival estimates for downstream migrant yearling juvenile salmonids through the Snake and Columbia River hydropower system 1966-1980 and 1993-1999. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 21:310-17
195. Williams JG, Tuttle ME. 1992. The Columbia River: Fish habitat restoration following hydroelectric dam construction. In Restoring the Nation's Marine Environment, ed. GW Thayer, pp. 405-22. College Park: Maryland Sea Grant
196. Willson MF, Gende SM, Marston BH. 1998. Fishes and the forest. BioScience 48:455-62
197. Willson MF, Halupka KC. 1995. Anadromous fish as keystone species in vertebrate communities. Conserv. Biol. 9:489-97
198. Wipfli MS, Hudson JP, Chaloner DT, Caouette JR. 1999. Influence of salmon spawner densities on stream productivity in southeast alaska. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56(9):1600-11
199. Wondolleck JM, Yaffee SL. 2000. Making Collaboration Work. Lessons from Natural Resource Management. Washington, DC: Island
200. Wood CC. 1987. Predation of juvenile Pacific salmon by the common merganser (Mergus merganser) on Eastern Vancouver Island. I: Predation during seaward migration. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 44:941-49
201. Wood CC. 1995. Life History Variation and Population Structure in Sockeye Salmon. See Nielsen 1995, pp. 195-216
202. Wood CC, Riddell BE, Rutherford DT, Withler RE. 1994. Biochemical genetic survey of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) in Canada. Can J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 51:114-31
203. Zabel RW, Williams JG. 2002. Selective mortality in chinook salmon: What is the role of human disturbance? Ecol. Appl. 21 (1):173-83
204. Zinn JL, Johnson KA, Sander JE, Fryer JL. 1977. Susceptibility of salmonid species and hatchery stocks of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) to infections by Ceratomyxa shasta. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 34:933-36