The influence of scale on salmon habitat restoration priorities

Animal Conservation

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 271-282

  Feist, Blake E ^a   Steel, E Ashley ^a   Pess, George R ^a   Bilby, Robert E ^a,b  

^a ALASKA FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENDANGERED SPECIES; HABITAT LOSS; HABITAT RESTORATION; SALMONID; SCALE EFFECT;

IDAHO; NORTH AMERICA; SALMON RIVER [IDAHO]; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA;

EID: 6344226288     PISSN: 13679430     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1367943003003330     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Achord, S., Mathews, G. M., Johnson, O. W. & Marsh, D. M. (1996). Use of passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags to monitor migration timing of Snake River Chinook Salmon smolts. N. Am. J. Fish. Mgmt. 16: 302-313.
2. Anderson, J. R., Hardy, E. E., Roach, J. T. & Witmer, R. E. (1976). A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 964. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey.
3. Beechie, T. & Bolton, S. (1999). An approach to restoring salmonid habitat-forming processes in Pacific Northwest watersheds. Fisheries 24: 6-15.
4. Belsky, A. J., Matzke, A. & Uselman, S. (1999). Survey of livestock influences on stream and riparian ecosystems in the western United States. J. Soil Water Conserv. 54: 419-431.
5. Bjornn, T. C. (1971). Trout and salmon movements in two Idaho streams as related to temperature, food, stream flow, cover, and population density. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 100(3): 423-438.
6. Bryk, A. S. & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
7. Chapman, D. W. (1966). Food and space as regulators of salmonid populations in streams. Am. Nat. 100: 345-357.
8. Chapman, D. W., Giorgi, A., Hill, M., Park, D., Platts, W. S. & Pratt, K. (1990). Prefatory review of status of Snake River chinook salmon Prepared for Pacific Northwest Utilities Conference Committee. Boise, ID.
9. Crawley, M. J. (1990). The population dynamics of plants. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 330: 125-140.
10. Daly, C., Neilson, R. P. & Phillips, D. L. (1994). A statistical-topographic model for mapping climatological precipitation over mountainous terrain. J. Appl. Meteor. 33: 140-158.
11. Efron, B. & Tibshirani, R. (1986). The bootstrap method for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Stat. Sci. 1: 1-35.
12. Elliot, S. R., Coe, T. A., Helfield, J. M. & Naimen, R. J. (1998). Spatial variation in environmental characteristics of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) rivers. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55: 267-280.
13. Fausch, K. D., Hawkes, C. L. & Parsons, M. G. (1988). Models that predict standing crop of stream fish from habitat variables: 1950-85. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-213. Portland, OR: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
14. Good, P. (1997). Permutation tests: a practical guide to resampling methods for testing hypotheses. New York: Springer-Verlag.
15. Holtby, L. B. & Scrivener, J. C. (1989). Observed and simulated effects of climate variability, clear-cut logging, and fishing on the numbers of chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) and coho salmon (O. kisutch) returning to Carnation Creek, British Columbia. Special Publication, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 105: 62-81.
16. Homer, C. G. (1998). Idaho/western Wyoming land cover classification report and metadata. Report: Metadata, Remote Sensing/NSGIS Laboratories. Logan, UT: Department of Geography and Earth Resources, Utah State University.
17. House, R. (1995). Temporal variation in abundance of an isolated population of cutthroat trout in Western Oregon, 1981-1991. N. Am. J. Fish. Mgmt. 15: 33-41.
18. ICBEMP (Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project) Spatial Data. (1999). Portland, OR: ICBEMP, October 1999. [July 1999]. URL: .
19. Junk, W., Bayley, P. B. & Sparks, R. E. (1989). The flood-pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. Special Publ. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 106: 110-127.
20. Kareiva, P., Marvier, M. & McClure, M. (2000). Recovery and management options for spring/summer chinook salmon in the Columbia River basin. Science 290: 977-979.
21. Laird, N. M. & Ware, H. (1982). Random effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 38: 963-974.
22. Levin, S. A. (1992). The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73: 1943-1967.
23. Levin, P. S., Achord, S., Feist, B. E. & Zabel, R. W. (2002). Non-indigenous brook trout and the demise of Pacific salmon: a forgotten threat? Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. Ser. B. 269: 1663-1670.
24. Levin, P. S. & Tolimieri, N. (2001). Differences in the impacts of dams on the dynamics of salmon populations. Anim. Conserv. 4: 291-299.
25. Lichatowich, J., Mobrand, L., Lestelle, L. & Vogel, T. (1995). An approach to diagnosis and treatment of depleted Pacific salmon populations in Pacific Northwest watersheds. Fisheries 20: 10-18.
26. McClure, M. M., Holmes, E. E., Sanderson, B. L. & Jordan, C. E. (2003). A large-scale, multi-species assessment: anadromous salmonids in the Columbia River basin. Ecol. Applic. in press.
27. Marmorek, D. R., Peters, C. N. & Parnell, I. (1998). PATH final report for fiscal year 1998. ESSA Technologies Ltd, Vancouver, BC.
28. Matthews, G. M. & Waples, R. S. (1991). Status review for Snake River spring and summer chinook salmon. NOAA Technical Memo NMFS F/ NWC-200. Seattle, WA: US Department of Commerce.
29. Neter, J., Kutner, M. H. & Wasserman, W. (1996). Applied linear statistical models. New York: McGraw-Hill.
30. NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service) (1991). Endangered and threatened species: endangered status for Snake River sockeye salmon. Federal Register [Docket No. 910379-1256, 20 November 1991] 56 (224): 58,619-58,624.
31. NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service) (1992). Endangered and threatened species: threatened status for Snake River spring/summer chinook salmon; threatened status for Snake River fall chinook salmon Federal Register [Docket No. 910647-2043, 22 April 1992] 57 (78): 14,653-14,662.
32. NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service) (1997). Endangered and threatened species: listing of several evolutionarily significant units (ESUs) of west coast steelhead. Federal Register [Docket No. 960730210-7193-02, 18 August 1997] 62(159): 43,937-43,954.
33. NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service) (2000). Biological opinion - reinitiation of consultation on operation of the federal Columbia River power system, including the juvenile fish transportation program, and 19 Bureau of Reclamation projects in the Columbia basin. NMFS, Endangered Species Act Section 7 consultation. December 21.
34. NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service) (2003). Draft report of updated status of listed ESUs of salmon and steelhead. US Department of Commerce, NOAA Tech. Memo. URL: .
35. NRC (National Research Council) (1996). Upstream: salmon and society in the Pacific Northwest. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
36. Petrosky C. E. & Holubetz, T. B. (1988). Idaho habitat evaluation for off-site mitigation record, Annual report, 1987. US Department of Energy, Bonneville Power Administration, Division of Fish and Wildlife. Portland, OR: Idaho Department of Fish and Game.
37. Petrosky C. E., Schaller, H. A. & Budy, P. (2001). Productivity and survival rate trends in the freshwater spawning and rearing stage of Snake River chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58: 1196-1207.
38. Platts, W. S. (1991). Livestock grazing. In Influences of forest and rangeland management on salmonid fishes and their habitats: 389-423. Meehan, W. R. (Ed.). AFS special publication.
39. Redmond, R. L. (1997). Mapping existing vegetation and land cover across western Montana and northern Idaho. Wildlife Spatial Analysis Lab. University of Montana, Missoula, MT: Montana Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit.
40. Schaller, H. A., Petrosky, C. E. & Langness, O. P. (1999). Contrasting patterns of productivity and survival rates for stream-type chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) populations of the Snake and Columbia rivers. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56: 1031-1045.
41. Sedell, J. R. & Luchessa, K. J. (1982). Using the historical record as an aid to salmonid habitat enhancement. In Acquisition and utilization of aquatic habitat inventory information: 210-223. Armantrout, N. A. (Ed.). Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society, Western Division.
42. Thornton, P. E., Running, S. W. & White, M. A. (1997). Generating surfaces of daily meteorological variables over large regions of complex terrain. J. Hydrol. 190: 214-251.
43. Thurow, R. F. (2000). Dynamics of chinook salmon populations within Idaho's Frank Church Wilderness: Implications for persistence. In Wilderness science in a time of change conference. Vol. 3. Wilderness as a place for scientific inquiry. McCool, S. F., Cole, D. N., Borrie, W. T. & O'Loughlin, J. (Eds). May 1999, Missoula, MT. Proceedings RMRS-P-O-VOL-3. Ogden, UT: USDA, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
44. Waples, R. S., Ford, M. J. & Schmitt, D. (2003). Empirical results of salmon supplementation: a preliminary assessment. In Ecological and genetic implications of aquaculture activities. Bert, T. (Ed.). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. In press.