Natural orifice surgery with an endoluminal mobile robot

Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

Volumn 21, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 1212-1215

  Rentschler, Mark E ^a   Dumpert, Jason ^a   Platt, Stephen R ^a   Farritor, Shane M ^a   Oleynikov, Dmitry ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Endoluminal; In vivo; Laparoscopy; Mobile; Robots; Transgastric

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; ESOPHAGOGASTRODUODENOSCOPY; ESOPHAGUS; INSTRUMENTATION; NONHUMAN; PERITONEAL CAVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOTICS;

ANIMALS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT SAFETY; GASTROSCOPY; LAPAROSCOPY; MINIATURIZATION; MODELS, ANIMAL; ROBOTICS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 34347369995     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9400-z     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Satava RM (2002) Surgical robotics: the early chronicles. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12: 6-16
2. Ballantyne GH (2002) Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Surg Endosc 16: 1389-1402
3. Schurr MO, Buess G, Neisius B, Voges U. (2000) Robotics and telemanipulation technologies for endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 14: 375-381
4. Moorthy K, Munz Y, Dosis A, Hernandez J, Martin S, Bello F, Rockall T, Darzi A (2004) Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 18: 790-795
5. Dakin GF, Gagner M (2003) Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems. Surg Endosc 17: 574-579
6. Nio D, Bemelman WA, den Boer KT, Dunker MS, Gouma DJ, van Gulik TM (2002) Efficiency of manual vs robotical (Zeus)-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of standardized tasks. Surg Endosc 16: 412-415
7. Melvin WS, Needleman BJ, Krause KR, Schneider C, Ellison EC (2002) Computer-enhanced vs standard laparoscopic antireflux surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 6: 11-16
8. Choi D, Riviere C (2005) Flexure-based manipulator for active handheld microsurgical instrument. Proceedings of the 27th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS). Shanghai, China
9. Ang W (2004) Active tremor compensation in handheld instrument for microsurgery. Doctoral dissertation, tech report SMU-RI-TR-04-28, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
10. Riviere C, Ang W, Khosla P (2003) Toward active tremor canceling in handheld microsurgical instruments. IEEE Trans Robotics Automation 15: 793-800
11. Rosen J, Lum M, Trimble D, Hannaford B, Sinanan M (2005) Spherical mechanism analysis of a surgical robot for minimally invasive surgery: analytical and experimental approaches: medicine meets virtual reality. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 111: 422-428
12. Rosen J, Hannaford B, MacFarlane M, Sinanan M (1999) Force controlled and teleoperated endoscopic grasper for minimally invasive surgery: experimental performance evaluation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 46: 1212-1221
13. MacFarlane M, Rosen J, Hannaford B, Pellegrini C, Sinanan M (1999) Force feedback grasper helps restore the sense of touch in minimally invasive surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 3: 278-285
14. Fukuda T, Guo S, Kosuge K, Arai F, Negoro M, Nakabayashi K (1994) Microactive catheter system with multi degrees of freedom. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. San Diego, CA
15. Suzumori K, Iikura S, Tanaka H (1991) Development of flexible microactuator and its applications to robotics mechanisms. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Seoul, Korea
16. Olympus (2004) Olympus Medical develops capsule camera technology, at http://www.letsgodigital.org/en/news/articles/story_2150.html December 2, 2004
17. Phee L, Accoto D, Menciassi A, Stefanini C, Carrozza M, Dario P (2002) Analysis and development of locomotion devices for the gastrointestinal tract. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 49: 613-616
18. Slatkin AB, Burdick JW, Grundfest SW (1995) The development of a robotic endoscope. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Nagoya, Japan pp 162-171
19. Flynn A, Udayakumar K, Barret DS, McLurkin JD, Franck DL, Shectman AN (1998) Tomorrow's surgery: micromotors and microrobots for minimally invasive procedures. Minim Invasive Surg Allied Technol 7: 343-352
20. Breedveld P, Danielle E, Van Gorp M (2004) Locomotion through the intestine by means of rolling stents. Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences. Salt Lake City, UT
21. Rentschler M, Dumpert J, Platt SR, Farritor S, Oleynikov D (2006) Mobile in vivo robots provide sole visual feedback for abdominal exploration and cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 20: 135-138
22. Rentschler M, Dumpert J, Platt S, Farritor S, Oleynikov D (2006) Mobile In vivo biopsy and camera robot. Studies Health Technol Informatics 119: 449-454
23. Kantsevoy S, Jagannath S, Niiyama H, Chung S, Cotton P, Gostout C, Hawes R, Pasticha P, Magee C, Vaughn C (2005) Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 62: 287-292
24. Jagannath S, Kantsevoy S, Vaughn C, Chung S, Cotton P, Gostout C, Hawes R, Pasricha P, Scorpio D, Magee C (2005) Peroral transgastric endoscopic ligation of fallopian tubes with long-term survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 61: 449-453
25. Park P, Bergström M, Ikeda K, Fritscher-Ravens A, Swain P (2005) Experimental studies of transgastric gallbladder surgery: cholecystectomy and cholecystogastric anastomosis. Gastrointest Endosc 61: 601-606
26. Reddy N, Rao VG (2005) Oral communication, May 15 and 19
27. Reddy N (2004) Oral communication, May