Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery

Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 790-795

  Moorthy, K ^a   Munz, Y ^a   Dosis, A ^a   Hernandez, J ^a   Martin, S ^a   Bello, F ^a   Rockall, T ^a   Darzi, A ^a  

^a ST MARY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

3 D vision; Dexterity enhancement; Robotic surgery

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOTICS; SKILL; SUTURING METHOD; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 2442526347     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-8922-2     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Berguer R (1999) Surgery and ergonomics. Arch Surg 134: 1011-1016
2. Beurger R, Rember M, Beckley D (1997) Laparoscopic instruments cause increased forearm fatigue: a subjective and objective comparison of open and laparoscopic techniques. Min Invasive Ther Allied 6: 36-40
3. Buess GF, Schurr MO, Fischer SC (2000) Robotics and allied technologies in endoscopic surgery. Arch Surg 132: 229-235
4. Chan A, Chung S, Yim A, Lau J, Ng E, Li A (1997) Comparison of two-dimensional vs three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 11: 438-440
5. Cheah WK, Lenzi JE, So J, Dong F, Kum CK, Goh P (2001) Evaluation of a head-mounted display (HMD) in the performance of a simulated laparoscopic task. Surg Endosc 15: 990-991
6. Davies B (2000) A review of robotics in surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng 214: 129-140
7. Dosis A, Bello F, Rockall T, Munz Y, Moorthy K, Martin S, Darzi A (200x) ROVIMAS: a software package for assessing surgical skills using the da Vinci telemanipulator system.
8. Felger JE, Nifong LW, Chitwood WR Jr (2002) The evolution of and early experience with robot-assisted mitral valve surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Technol 12: 58-63
9. Gallagher AG, Satava RM (2002) Virtual reality as a metric for the assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills. Learning curves and reliability measures. Surg Endosc 16: 1746-1752
10. Hanna GB, Cuschieri A (2000) Influence of two-dimensional and three-dimensional imaging on endoscopic bowel suturing. World J Surg 24: 444-449
11. Hernandez JD, Bann SD, Munz Y, Moorthy K, Datta V, Martin S, Dosis A, Bello F, Darzi A, Rockall T (2002) The learning curve of a simulated surgical task using the da Vinci telemanipulator system. Br J Surg 89(suppl): 17-18
12. Johns DB, Brewer JD, Soper NJ (1996) The influence of three-dimensional video systems on laparoscopic task performance. Surg Laparosc Endosc 6: 191-197
13. Kim VB, Chapman WHH, Albrecht RJ, et al. (2002) Early experience with Telemanipulative Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy using da Vinci. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Technol 12: 33-40
14. Mueller MD, Camartin C, Dreher E, Hanggi W (1999) Three-dimensional laparoscopy. Gadget or progress? A randomized trial on the efficacy of three-dimensional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 13: 469-472
15. Munz Y, Hernandez H, Bann S, Bello F, Dosis A, Martin S, Moorthy K, Rockall T, Darzi A (2002) The advantages of 3D visualization in surgical performance with the Da-Vinci telemaniputation system. J Soc Laparosc Surg 6: 264
16. Shea JA, Healey MJ, Berlin JA, Clarke JR, Malet PF, Staroscik RN, Schwartz JS, Williams SV (1996) Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A meta-analysis. Ann Surg 224: 609-620
17. Taffinder N, Smith S, Mair J, et al. (1999) Can a computer measure surgical precision? Reliability, validity and feasibility of the ICSAD. Surg Endosc 13(suppl 1): 81
18. Williams LF, Chapman WC, Bonau RA, McGee EC, Boyd RW, Jacobs JK (1993) Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with open cholecystectomy in a single center. Am J Surg 165: 459-465
19. Yohannes P, Rotariu P, Pinto P, Smith AD, Lee BR (2002) Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve? Urology 60: 39-45.