The consequences of campaign agendas

American Politics Research

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 465-488

  Sides, John ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Campaign agendas; Campaign strategy; Issue ownership; Political campaigns; U.S. House elections; U.S. Senate elections

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250641473     PISSN: 1532673X     EISSN: 15523373     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X07300648     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Abbe, O.G., Goodliffe, J., Herrnson, P.S., Patterson, K.D. (2003). Agenda setting in congressional elections: The impact of issues and campaigns on voting behavior. Political Research Quarterly, 56, 419-430.
2. Ansolabehere, S., Iyengar, S. (1994). Riding the wave and claiming ownership over issues: The joint effects of advertising and news coverage in campaigns. Public Opinion Quarterly, 58, 335-357.
3. Bartels, L.M. (1997). Specification uncertainty and model averaging. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 641-674.
4. Berelson, B.R., Lazarsfeld, P.F., McPhee, W.N. (1954). Voting: A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Brader, T. (2006). Campaigning for hearts and minds: How emotional appeals in political ads work. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
6. Brasher, H. (2003). Capitalizing on contention: Issue agendas in U.S. senate campaigns. Political Communication, pp. 453-471.
7. Budge, I., Farlie, D.J. (1983). Explaining and predicting elections: Issue effects and party strategies in twenty-three democracies. London: Allen Unwin.
8. Carsey, T.M. (2000). Campaign dynamics: The race for governor. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
9. Damore, D.F. (2004). The dynamics of issue ownership in presidential campaigns. Political Research Quarterly, 57, 391-397.
10. Damore, D.F. (2005). Issue convergence in presidential campaigns. Political Behavior, 27, 71-97.
11. Freedman, P., Franz, M., Goldstein, K. (2004). Campaign advertising and democratic citizenship. American Journal of Political Science, 48, 723-741.
12. Freedman, P., Goldstein, K. (1999). Measuring media exposure and the effects of negative campaign ads. American Journal of Political Science, 43, 1189-1208.
13. Goldstein, K., Freedman, P. (2000). New evidence for new arguments: Money and advertising in the 1996 senate elections. Journal of Politics, 62, 1087-1108.
14. Goldstein, K., Freedman, P. (2002). Campaign advertising and voter turnout: New evidence for a stimulation effect. Journal of Politics, 64, 721-740.
15. Gronke, P. (2000). The electorate, the campaign, and the office: A unified approach to senate and house elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
16. Hammond, T.H., Humes, B.D. (1993). The spatial model and elections. In B. Grofman (Ed.), Information, participation, and choice (pp. 141-159). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
17. Holian, D.B. (2004). He's stealing my issues! Clinton's crime rhetoric and the dynamics of issue ownership. Journal of Politics, 26, 95-124.
18. Iyengar, S., Kinder, D. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Iyengar, S., Valentino, N.A. (2000). Who says what? Source credibility as a mediator of campaign advertising. In A. Lupia, M. D. McCubbins, S. L. Popkin (Eds.), Elements of reason: Cognition, choice, and the bounds of rationality (pp. 108-129). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
20. Jacobson, G.C. (2004). The politics of congressional elections. New York: Pearson Longman.
21. Johnston, R., Blais, A., Brady, H.E., Crte, J. (1992). Letting the people decide: Dynamics of a Canadian election. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
22. Kahn, K.F., Kenney, P.J. (1999). The spectacle of U.S. senate campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23. Lubenow, G.C. (1995). California votesThe 1994 governor's race: An inside look at the candidates and their campaigns by the people who managed them. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Governmental Studies Press.
24. Norpoth, H., Buchanan, B. (1992). Wanted: The education president: Issue trespassing by political candidates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 87-99.
25. Petrocik, J.R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 825-850.
26. Petrocik, J.R., Benoit, W.L., Hansen, G.J. (2003). Issue ownership and presidential campaigning, 1952-2000. Political Science Quarterly, 118, 599-626.
27. Prior, M. (2001). Weighted content analysis of political advertisements. Political Communication, 18, 335-345.
28. Ridout, T., Kaplan, N., Park, D. (2006). Dialogue in American political campaigns? An examination of issue engagement in candidate television advertising. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 724-736.
29. Riker, W. (1983). Political theory: The art of heresthetics. In A. Finifter (Ed.), Political science: The state of the discipline (pp. 47-67). Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
30. Sellers, P. (1998). Strategy and background in congressional campaigns. American Political Science Review, 92, 159-171.
31. Shaw, D.R. (1999). The effect of TV ads and candidate appearances on statewide presidential votes, 1988-96. American Political Science Review, 93, 345-361.
32. Sides, J. (2006). The origins of campaign agendas. British Journal of Political Science, 36, 407-436.
33. Sigelman, L., Buell, Jr., E.H. (2004). Avoidance or engagement? Issue convergence in U.S. presidential campaigns, 1960-2000. American Journal of Political Science, 48, 650-661.
34. Simon, A.F. (2002). The winning message: Candidate behavior, campaign discourse, and democracy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
35. Spiliotes, C.J., Vavreck, L. (2002). Campaign advertising: Partisan convergence or divergence ? Journal of Politics, 64, 249-261.
36. Sulkin, T., Evans, J. (2006). Dynamics of diffusion. American Politics Research, 34, 505-534.
37. Zaller, J. (2001). Monica Lewinsky and the mainsprings of American politics. In W. L. Bennett R. M. Entman (Eds.), Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy (pp. 252-278). New York: Cambridge University Press.