He's Stealing My Issues! Clinton's Crime Rhetoric and the Dynamics of Issue Ownership

Political Behavior

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 95-124

  Holian, David B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

Author keywords

content analysis; crime; issue ownership; presidency; rhetoric

Indexed keywords

EID: 4043068456     PISSN: 01909320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:POBE.0000035959.35567.16     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. Akaike, Hirotogu (1974). A new look at statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. AC-19: 716-723.
2. Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Iyengar, Shanto (1994). Riding the wave and claiming ownership over issues: The joint effects of advertising and news coverage in campaigns. Public Opinion Quarterly 58: 335-357.
3. Bartels, Larry M. (1996). Politicians and the press: Who leads, who follows? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, August 28-September 1.
4. Baumgartner, Frank, and Jones, Bryan D. (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Brace, Paul, and Hinckley, Barbara (1992). Follow the Leader: Opinion Polls and the Modern Presidents. New York: Basic Books.
6. Bradley, Barbara (1988). Where the candidates stand on crime and ethics. The Christian Science Monitor, p. 3.
7. Budge, Ian, and Farlie, Dennis J. (1983). Party competition-selective emphasis or direct confrontation? An alternative view with data. In Hans Daadler and Peter Mair (eds.), Western European Party Systems, pp. 267-306. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
8. Burden, Barry C. and Sanberg, Joseph Neal Rice (2003). Budget rhetoric in presidential campaigns from 1952 to 2000. Political Behavior 25: 97-118.
9. Carmines, Edward G., and Kuklinski, James H. (1990). Incentives, opportunities, and the logic of public opinion in American political representation. In James H. Kuklinski and John A. Ferejohn,(eds.), Information and Democratic Processes. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
10. Cohen, Jeffrey E. (1995). Presidential rhetoric and the public agenda. American Journal of Political Science 39: 87-107.
11. Cohen, Jeffrey E. (1997). Presidential Responsiveness and Public Policy-Making. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
12. Dearing, James W., and Rogers, Everett M. (1996). Agenda Setting. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Edwards, George C., III, and Wood, B. Dan (1999). Who influences whom? The president, congress, and the media. American Political Science Review 93: 327-344.
14. Erbring, Lutz, Goldenberg, Edie N., and Miller, Arthur H. (1980). Front-Page News and Real-World Cues: A New Look at Agenda-Setting by the Media. American Journal of Political Science 24: 16-49.
15. Flemming, Roy B., Wood B., Dan, and Bohte, John (1999). Attention to issues in a system of separated powers: The macrodynamics of American policy agendas. Journal of Politics 61: 76-108.
16. Freeman, John, Houser, Daniel, Kellstedt, Paul M., and Williams, John T. (1998). Long-memoried processes, unit roots, and causal inference in political science. American Journal of Political Science 42: 1289-1327.
17. Freeman, John R., Williams, John T., and Lin, Tse-min (1989). Vector autoregression and the study of politics. American Journal of Political Science 33: 842-877.
18. Germond, Jack W., and Witcover, Jules (1993). Mad As Hell: Revolt at the Ballot Box, 1992. New York: Warner Books, Inc.
19. Gerner, Deborah, and Philip A. Schrodt (1996). The Kansas Event Data System: A beginners guide with an application to the study of media fatigue in the Palestinian Intifada. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, August 28-September 1.
20. Holmes, Steven A. (1994). Blacks relent on crime bill, but not without bitterness. The New York Times, sec. A, p. 1.
21. Iffil, Gwen (1992). The 1992 campaign: Democrats; Clinton stands by remark on rapper. The New York Times, sec. A, p. 16.
22. Iyengar, Shanto, and Kinder, Donald R. (1987). News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
23. Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Shapiro, Robert Y. (2000). Politicians Don't Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Jones, Charles O. (1994). The Presidency in a Separated System. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
25. Judge, George G., Griffiths, W. E., Hill, R., Carter, Lutkepohl, Helmit, and Lee, Tsoung-Chao (1988). Introduction to the Theory and Practice and Practice of Econometrics. New York: Wiley.
26. Kingdon, John W. (1995). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, Second Edition. New York: HarperCollins.
27. Krause, George A. (1997). Policy preference formation and subsystem behaviour: The case of commercial bank regulation, British Journal of Political Science 27: 525-550.
28. La Ganga, Maria L., Shogan, Robert, and Chen, Edwin (1996). Missteps, lost opportunities taking their toll on Dole. Los Angeles Times, part A, p. 1.
29. Lubell, Samuel (1970). The Hidden Crisis in American Politics. New York: Norton.
30. McCombs, Maxwell E., and Shaw, Donald L. (1972). The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media. Public Opinion Quarterly 36: 176-187.
31. McGinnis, Michael D., and Williams, John T. (1989). Change and stability in superpower rivalry. American Political Science Review 83: 1101-1123.
32. Morris, Dick (1999). Behind the Oval Office: Getting Reelected Against All Odds. Los Angeles: Renaissance Books.
33. Nisbett, Richard and Ross, Lee (1980). Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
34. Petrocik, John R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science 40: 825-850.
35. Phillips, Kevin B. (1970). The Emerging Republican Majority. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor Books.
36. Popkin, Samuel (1994). The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37. Pratto, Felicia, and John, Oliver P. (1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61: 382-391.
38. Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States. (1981-2001). Washington, DC: Federal Register Division, National Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration.
39. Rahn, Wendy M. (1993). The role of partisan stereotypes in information processing about political candidates. American Journal of Political Science 37: 472-496.
40. Riffe, Daniel, Lacy, Stephen, and Fico, Frederick G. (1998). Analyzing Media Messages: Using Quantitative Content Analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41. Riker, William H. (1984). The heresthetics of constitution-making: The presidency in 1787, with comments on determinism and rational choice. American Political Science Review 78: 1-16.
42. Riker, William H. (1986). The Art of Political Manipulation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
43. Riker, William H. (1996). The Strategy of Rhetoric: Campaigning for the American Constitution. New Haven: Yale University Press.
44. Roberts, Steven V. (1981). Kennedy set to compromise to obtain gun Control bill. The New York Times, sec. A, p. 22.
45. Rogers, Everett M., and Dearing, James W. (1988). Agenda-setting research: Where has it been, where is it going? Communication Yearbook 11: 555-594.
46. Sears, David O., and Richard E. Whitney (1973). Political Persuasion. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
47. Sellers, Patrick J. (1998). Strategy and background in congressional campaigns. American Political Science Review 92: 159-171.
48. Shaw, Donald L., and McCombs, Maxwell E. (1977). The Emergence of American Political Issues: The Agenda-Setting Function of the Media. St. Paul, MN: West.
49. Sims, Christopher A. (1980). Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica 48: 1-48.
50. Sims, Christopher A., and Zha, Tao (1999). Error bands for impulse responses. Econometrica 67: 1113-1155.
51. Smith, Jeffrey R. (1989). U.S. assault weapons ban 'under review,' aide says. The Washington Post, p. A6.
52. Sniderman, Paul M., Brody, Richard A., and Tetlock, Philip E. (1991). Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Williams, John T. (1990). The political manipulation of macroeconomic policy. American Political Science Review 84: 767-795.
54. Williams, John T., and Collins, Brian K. (1997). The political economy of corporate taxation. American Journal of Political Science 41: 208-244.
55. Wood, B., Dan, and Peake, Jeffrey S. (1998). The dynamics of foreign policy agenda setting. American Political Science Review 92: 173-184.