Campaign advertising and voter turnout: New evidence for a stimulation effect

Journal of Politics

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 721-740

  Goldstein, Ken ^a   Freedman, Paul ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036679509     PISSN: 00223816     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0022-3816.00143     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Replicating experiments using aggregate and survey data: The case of negative advertising and turnout
2. Does attack advertising demobilize the electorate?
3. Going negative: How political ads shrink and polarize the electorate
4. The multiple ambiguities of 'counteractive lobbying'
5. Voter turnout and the national election studies
6. A spot check: Casting doubt on the demobilizing effect of attack advertising
7. Measuring media exposure and the effects of negative campaign Ads
8. Campaign advertising, perceived fairness, and voter turnout
9. What voters see as 'fair game' in campaign advertising
10. Eliminating the negative? Defining and refining categories of analysis for political advertisements
11. Do negative campaigns mobilize or suppress turnout? Clarifying the relationship between negativity and participation
12. Two explanations for negativity effects in political behavior
13. The effects of negative political advertisements: A meta-analytical assessment?
14. The effect of TV Ads and candidate appearances on statewide presidential votes, 1988-96
15. Response validity in surveys of voting behavior
16. Negative campaign advertising: Demobilizer or mobilizer?