Is the sine-wave speech cocktail party worth attending?

Speech Communication

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 159-174

  Barker, Jon ^a   Cooke, Martin ^b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PROCESSING;

COHERENT SPEECH PERCEPTS; SINE-WAVE SPEECH;

SPEECH RECOGNITION;

EID: 0032663191     PISSN: 01676393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-6393(98)00081-8     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bailey, P.J., Summerfield, A., Dorman, M., 1977. On the identification of sine-wave analogues of certain speech sounds, Haskins Labs., Technical report SR-51/52.
2. Barker, J.P., 1998. The relationship between auditory organisation and speech perception: Studies with spectrally reduced speech, PhD thesis, Sheffield University, UK, in preparation.
3. Barker, J.P., Cooke, M.P., 1997. Modelling the recognition of spectrally reduced speech. In: Proceedings of EuroSpeech 97, Rhodes, 1997.
4. Bashford J.A., Riener K.R., Warren R.M. Increasing the intelligibility of speech through multiple phonemic restorations. Perception and Psychophysics. 51(3):1992;211-217.
5. Bregman A.S. Auditory streaming is cumulative. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 4(3):1978;380-387.
6. Bregman, A.S., 1990. Auditory scene analysis, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
7. Carrell T.D., Opie J.M. The effect of amplitude comodulation on auditory object formation in sentence preception. Perception and Psychophysics. 52:1992;437-445.
8. Cooke, M.P., Morris, A.C., Green, P.D., 1997. Missing data techniques for robust speech recognition. In: Proceedings of ICASSP 97, Munich, pp. 863-866.
9. Crowe, A.S., 1988. Generalised centroids: A new perspective on peak-picking and formant extraction. In: Ainsworth, W.A., Holmes, J.N. (Ed.), Proceedings of 7th Symposium of FASE (SPEECH'88), Los Altos, California, pp. 683-690.
10. Garofolo, J.S., Pallett, D.S., 1989. Use of the CD-ROM for speech database storage and exchange. In: European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, Paris, 1989.
11. Price, P., Fisher, W.M., Bernstein, J., Pallet, D.S., 1988. The DARPA 1000-word resource management database for continuous speech recognition. In: Proceedings of ICASSP 88, 1988, pp. 651-654.
12. Remez R.E., Rubin P.E. On the preception of the speech from time-varying acoustic information: Contributions of amplitude variation. Perception and Psychophysics. 48(4):1990;313-325.
13. Remez R.E., Rubin P.E., Pisoni D.B., Carrell T.D. Speech perception without traditional speech cues. Science. 212:1981;947-950.
14. Remez R.E., Rubin P.E., Berns S.M., Pardo J.S., Lang J.M. On the perceptual organization of speech. Psychological Review. 101(1):1994;129-156.
15. Warren, R.M., 1996. Processing of speech and other auditory patterns: some similarities and differences. In: Proceedings of ESCA ETRW on the Auditory Basis of Speech Perception, Keele, pp. 226-231.
16. Young, S.J., Woodland, P.C., 1993. HTK Version 1.5. Cambridge University Engineering Department.