Does node stability underlie the verbal transformation effect? A test of node structure theory

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 64, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 795-803

  Shoaf, Lisa Contos ^a   Pitt, Mark A ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; RANDOMIZATION; VISUAL ILLUSION;

HUMANS; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; RANDOM ALLOCATION; VOCABULARY;

EID: 0036636616     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194746     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. LUCE, P. A., & PISONI, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear & Hearing, 19, 1-36.
2. LUCE, P. A., PISONI, D. B., & GOLDINGER, S. D. (1990). Similarity neighborhoods of spoken words. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.). Cognitive models of speech processing (pp. 148-172). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. MACKAY, D. G. (1987). The asymmetrical relationship between speech perception and production. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 301-333). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. MACKAY, D. G., BURKE, D. M., & STEWART, R. (1998). H.M.'s language production deficits: Implications for relations between memory, semantic binding, and the hippocampal system. Journal of Memory & Language, 38, 28-69.
5. MACKAY, D. G., WULF, G., YIN, C., & ABRAMS, L. (1993). Relations between word perception and production: New theory and data on the verbal transformation effect. Journal of Memory & Language, 32, 624-646.
6. MCCLELLAND, J. L., & ELMAN, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86.
7. NATSOULAS, T. (1965). A study of the verbal-transformation effect. American Journal of Psychology, 78, 257-263.
8. NORRIS, D., MCQUEEN, J., & CUTLER, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 23, 299-370.
9. VITEVITCH, M. S., & LUCE, P. A. (1999). Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 40, 374-408.
10. WARREN, R. M. (1961a). Illusory changes in repeated words: Differences between young adults and the aged. American Journal of Psychology, 74, 506-516.
11. WARREN, R. M. (1961b). Illusory changes of distinct speech upon repetition: The verbal transformation effect. British Journal of Psychology, 52, 249-258.
12. WARREN, R. M. (1983). Auditory illusions and their relation to mechanisms normally enhancing accuracy of perception. Journal of the Audiological Engineering Society, 31, 623-628.
13. WARREN, R. M., & GREGORY, R. L. (1958). An auditory analogue of the visual reversible figure. American Journal of Psychology, 71, 612-613.
14. WARREN, R. M., & WARREN, R. P. (1966). A comparison of speech perception in childhood, maturity, and old age by means of the verbal transformation effect. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 5, 142-146.
15. YIN, C., & MACKAY, D. G. (1992, April). Auditory illusions and aging: Transmission of priming in the verbal transformation paradigm. Poster presented at the Cognitive Aging Conference, Atlanta.