Enhancing sixth graders' skills in revising narrative material: Effects of strategy instruction and self-regulation procedures;Förderung von Fertigkeiten zur Überarbeitung narrativer Texte bei Schülern der 6. Klasse Effekte von Revisionsstrategien und selbstregulatorischen Prozeduren

Zeitschrift fur Padagogische Psychologie

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 51-63

  Glaser, Cornelia ^a   Brunstein, Joachim C ^a  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Self regulation; Strategy instruction; Text revision

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250192215     PISSN: 10100652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1024/1010-0652.21.1.51     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Alexander, P. A. (1997). Mapping the multidimensional nature of domain learning: The interplay of cognitive, motivational, and strategic forces. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 213-250). Greenwich, CT: JA1.
2. Allai, L., Chanquoy, L. & Largy, P. (Eds.). (2004). Revision: Cognitive and instructional processes. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
3. Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Bridwell, L. S. (1980). Revising strategies in twelfth grade students' transactional writing. Research in the teaching of English, 14, 197-222.
5. Butterfield, E. C., Hacker, D. & Albertson, L. R. (1996). Environmental, cognitive, and metacognitive influence on text revision: Assessing the evidence. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 239-297.
6. Carver, C.S. & Scheier, M.F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. De La Paz, S. & Graham, S. (2002). Explicitly teaching strategies, skills, and knowledge: Writing instruction in middle school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 687-698.
8. De La Paz, S., Swanson, P. & Graham, S. (1998). The contribution of executive control to the revising of students with writing and learning difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 448-460.
9. Elliot-Faust, D.J. & Pressley, M. (1986). How to teach comparison processing to increase children's short- and long-term listening comprehension monitoring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 27-33.
10. Englert, C. S., Raphael, T. E., Anderson, L. M., Anthony, H. M. & Stevens, D.D. (1991). Making writing and self-talk visible: Cognitive strategy instruction in writing in regular and special education classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 337-372.
11. Faigley, L. & Witte, S. P. (1981). Analysing revision. College Composition and Communication, 32, 400-414.
12. Flower, L., Hayes, J.R., Carey, L., Schriver, K. & Stratman, J. (1986). Detection, diagnosis, and the strategies of revision. College Composition and Communication, 37, 16-55.
13. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Thompson, A., Svenson, E., Yen, L., Otaiba, S.A., Yang, N., McMaster, K. N., Prentice, K., Kazdan, S. & Saenz, L. (2001). Peer-assisted learning strategies in reading: Extensions for kindergarten, first grade, and high school. Remedial & Special Education, 22, 15-21.
14. Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Prentice, K., Burch, M., Hamlett, C.L., Owen, R. & Schroeter, K. (2003). Enhancing third-grade students' mathematical problem solving with self-regulated learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2, 306-315.
15. Glaser, C. & Brunstein, J.C. (in press). Improving fourth-grade students' composition skills: Effects of strategy instruction and self-regulation procedures. Journal of Educational Psychology.
16. Graham. S. (2006). Writing. In P.A. Alexander & P.H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 457-478). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Graham, S. (1997). Executive control in the revising of students with learning and writing difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 223-234.
18. Graham, S. & Harris, K.R. (1989). A components analysis of cognitive strategy instruction: Effects on learning disabled students' compositions and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 8, 353-361.
19. Graham, S., Harris, K.R. & Mason, L. (2005), Improving the writing performance, knowledge, and self-efficacy of struggling young writers: The effects of self-regulated strategy development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 207-241.
20. Graham, S., Harris, K. R. & Troia, G. A. (1998). Writing and selfregulation: Cases from the self-regulated strategy development model. In D.H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 20-41). New York: Guilford.
21. Graham, S., MacArthur, C. A. & Schwartz, S. S. (1995). The effects of goal setting and procedural facilitation on the revising behavior and writing performance of students with writing and learning problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 230-240.
22. Graham, S., Schwartz, S. & MacArthur, C. (1993). Knowledge of writing and the composing process, attitude toward writing, and self-efficacy for students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 237-249.
23. Hager, W. & Hasselhom, M. (2000). Psychologische Interventionsmaßnahmen: Was sollen sie bewirken können? In W. Hager, J.-L. Patry & H. Brezing (Hrsg.), Handbuch Evaluation psychologischer Interventionsmaβnahmen. Standards und Kriterien (S. 41-85). Bern: Hubcr.
24. Harris, K.R. & Graham, S. (1996). Making the writing process work: Strategies for composition and self-regulation (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Brookline Books.
25. Harris, K.R. & Graham, S. (1999). Programmatic intervention research: Illustrations from the evolution of self-regulated strategy development. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 251-262.
26. Hasselhorn, M. (1998). Metakognition. In D.H. Rost (Hrsg.), Handwörterbuch Pädagogische Psychologie (S. 348-351). Weinheini: Psychologie Verlags Union.
27. Hayes, J. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C.M. Levy & S.E. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 1-27). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Hayes, J.R. & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L.W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Hayes, J.R., Flower, L.S., Schriver, K. A., Stratman, J.R & Carey, L. (1987). Cognitive processes in revision. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics: Reading, writing, and language processing (Vol. 2, pp. 176-240). New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. Hidi, S. & Boscolo, P. (2006). Motivation and writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.). Handbook of writing research (pp. 144-157). New York: Guilford.
31. Keselman, H.J., Huberty, C.J., Lix, L.M., Olejnik, S., Cribbie. R. A., Donahue, B., Kowalchuk, R. K., Lowman, L.L., Petoskey, M.D., Keselman, J.C. & Levin, J.R. (1998). Statistical practices of educational researchers: An analysis of their ANOVA, MANOVA, and ANCOVA analyses. Review of Educational Research, 68, 350-386.
32. Klauer, K. (1993). Denktraining für Jugendliche. Ein Programm zur intellektuellen Förderung, Handanweisung. Hogrefe: Göttingen.
33. Leutner, D. & Leopold, C. (2003). Selbstreguliertes Lernen als Selbstregulation von Lernstrategien: Ein Trainingsexperiment mit Berufstätigen zum Lernen mit Sachtexten. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 31, 38-56.
34. MacArthur, C., Graham, S. & Harris, K. R. (2004). Insights from instructional research on revision with struggling writers. In L. Allai, L. Chanquoy & P. Largy (Eds.), Revision: Cognitive and instructional processes (pp. 125-138). Boston: Kluwer.
35. MacArthur, C., Graham, S. & Schwartz, S. (1991.). Knowledge of revision and revising behavior among students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 61-74.
36. May, P. (2002). Hamburger Schreibprobe zur Erfassung grundlegender Rechtschreibstrategien. Hamburg: Verlag für pädagogische Medien.
37. Ohser, E. (2003). Vater und Sohn: Sämtliche Streiche und Abenteuer. Konstanz: Südverlag.
38. Olive, T. & Levy, M.C. (Eds.). (2002). Contemporary tools and techniques for studying writing. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
39. Pressley, M., Borkowski, J.G. & Schneider, W. (1989). Good information processing. What it is and how education can promote it. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 857-867.
40. Rijlaarsdam, G., Braaksma, M., Coujzin, M., Janssen, T., Kieft, M., Broekkamp, H. & Van den Bergh, H. (2005). Psychology and the teaching of writing in 8000 and some words. Pedagogy - Learning for Teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology Monographs, Series II,.3, 127-153.
41. Rijlaarsdam, G. & Van den Bergh, H. (2006). Writing process theory: A functional dynamic approach. In C. A. McArthur, S. Graham & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 41 -53). New York: Guilford.
42. Sawyer, R., Graham, S. & Harris, K.R. (1992). Direct teaching, strategy instruction, and strategy instruction with explicit selfregulation: Effects on composition skills and self-efficacy of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 340-352.
43. Souvignier, E. & Mokhlesgerami, J. (2005). Implementierung eines Programms zur Vermittlung von Lesestrategien im Deutschunterricht: Die Rolle der Lehrenden. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 19, 249-261.
44. Souvignier, E. & Mokhlesgerami, J. (2006). Using self-regulation as a framework for implementing strategy instruction to foster reading comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 16, 57-71.
45. Stein, N. & Glenn, C. ( 1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), Advances in discourse processes: New directions in discourse processing (Vol. 2, pp. 53-120). Norwood, NJ: Ablex,
46. Strömqvist, S. & Karlsson, H. (2000). ScriptLog for Windows user's manual. Technical Report. Department of Linguistics,
47. Lund University; and Centre for Reading Research, University College of Stavanger.
48. Van der Hoeven, J. (1997). Children's composing: A study into the relationships between writing processes, text quality, and cognitive and linguistic skills. Utrecht Studies in Language and Communication (Vol. 12). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
49. Wong, B. Y. L., Wong, R. & Blenkinsop, J. (1989). Cognitive and metacognitive aspects of learning disabled adolescents' composing problems. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 310-323.
50. Zimmerman, B.J. (1998). Academic studying and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33, 73-86.
51. Zimmerman, B.J. & Kitsantas, A. (2002). Acquiring writing revision and self-regulation skill through observation and emulation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 600-668.
52. Zimmerman, B.J. & Risemberg, R. (1997). Becoming a self-reg ulated writer: A social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 73-101.