E-Learning: The student experience

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 560-573

  Gilbert, Jennifer ^a   Morton, Susan ^b   Rowley, Jennifer ^c  

^a ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTEGRATED LEARNING; LEARNING PROCESS;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; STUDENTS;

DISTANCE EDUCATION;

EID: 34250002857     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00723.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Alexander, S. (2001). E-learning developments and experiences. Education & Training, 43, 4/5, 240 248.
2. Baldwin, L. Sabry, K. (2003). Learning styles for interactive learning systems. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 40, 4, 325 340.
3. Blass, E. Davis, A. (2003). Building on solid foundations: establishing criteria for e-learning development. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 27, 3, 227 245.
4. Britain, S. Liber, O. (2000). A framework for pedagogical evaluation of virtual learning environments. London : JISC JTAP Report No. 041)
5. Chen, S. Macredie, R. (2002). Cognitive styles and hypermedia navigation: development of learning model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 1, 3 15.
6. Collis, B. Moonen, J. (2001). Flexible learning in a digital world: experiences and expectations. London : Kogan Page.
7. Crook, C. (1998). Children as computer users: the case of collaborative learning. Computers and Education, 30, 237 247.
8. Department for Education and Skills (DfES) 2003). Towards a unified e-learning strategy. London: Department for Education and Skills.
9. Garrison, D. R. Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: a framework for research and practice. Abingdon : Routledge.
10. Gunasekaran, A., McNeil, R. D. Shaul, D. (2002). E-learning: research and applications. Industrial and Commercial Training, 34, 2, 44 53.
11. Hartley, J. (2004). Is judging text on screen different from judging text in print? A naturalistic e-mail experiment. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 39, 1, 21 25.
12. Hughes, J. Attwell, G. (2003). A framework for the evaluation of e-learning. Paper presented to a seminar series on Exploring Models and Partnerships for eLearning in SME's, held in Stirling, Scotland and Brussels, Belgium, 2002/2003. Retrieved 14 February 2007, from http://www.theknownet.com/ ict_smes_seminars/papers/Hughes
13. Imel, S. (2002). E-learning - trends and issues alert Report No-40). Washington, DC : Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
14. Jochems, W., Van Merrienboer, J. Koper, R. (2003). Integrated e-learning: implications for pedagogy, technology and organisation. Abingdon : Routledge.
15. Khan, B. H. (2000). A framework for e-learning. Distance Education Report, 4, 24, 3 8.
16. McLoughlin, C. Luca, J. (2001, December 9-12). Quality in online delivery: what does it mean for assessment in e-learning environments? In Meeting at the crossroads. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computer in learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE 2001) (18th), Melbourne, Australia.
17. Miles, M. B. Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded source book. London : Sage.
18. Moore, K. Aspden, L. (2004). Coping adapting, evolving: the student experience of e-learning. Update, 3, 4, 22 24.
19. Morgan, G. (2001). Thirteen 'must ask' questions about e-learning products and services. The Learning Organisation, 8, 5, 203 210.
20. Ng, C. Hung, D. (2003). Conceptual sing a framework for design of online communities. International Journal on E-Learning, 2, 4, 60 71. Retrieved 14 February 2007, from http://dl.aace.org/14197.
21. Nicol, D. J., Minty, I. Sinclair, C. (2003). The social dimensions of online learning. Innovations in education and Teaching International, 40, 3, 270 280.
22. Pang, P. M. N. Hung, D. W. L. (2001). Activity theory as a framework for analyzing CBT and e-learning environments. Educational Technology, 41, 4, 36 42.
23. Roussos, M. (1997). Issues in the design and evaluation of a virtual reality learning environment MSc Thesis, University of Illinois at Chicago). Retrieved 14 February 2007, from http://www.evl.uic.edu/mariar/THESIS
24. Rowley, J. (2003). Designing student feedback questionnaires. Quality Assurance in Education, 11, 3, 142 149.
25. Sambrook, S. (2001). Factors influencing learner's perceptions of the quality of computer based learning materials. Journal of European Industrial Training, 25, 157 167.
26. Smith, A. D. Rupp, W. T. (2004). Managerial implications of computer-based online/face-to-face business education: a case study. Online Information Review, 28, 92, 100 109.
27. Steeples, C. Jones, C. (2001). Networked learning: perspectives and issues. Springer Verlag.
28. Strauss, A. L. Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. London : Sage.
29. Webb, E., Jones, A., Barker, P. Van Schaik, P. (2004). Using e-learning dialogues in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41, 1, 93 103.