Brief experimental analysis of Spanish reading fluency: An exploratory evaluation

Journal of Behavioral Education

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 143-154

  Dufrene, Brad A ^a   Warzak, William J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI   (United States)

^b NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Brief experimental analysis; Curriculum based measurement; Reading assessment; Reading fluency; Reading intervention

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249056226     PISSN: 10530819     EISSN: 15733513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10864-006-9007-9     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. August, D., & Hakuta, K. (1997). Improving schooling for language minority children: A research. National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
2. Baker, S. K., Plasencia-Peinado, J., & Lezcano-Lytle, V. (1998). The use of curriculum-based measurement with language-minority students. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (pp. 175-213). New York: The Guilford Press.
3. Beaver, J. (2001). Developmental reading assessment: K-3 teacher resource guide. Parsippany, NJ: Celebration Press.
4. Bilingual Education Act (1968). Pub. L. No. (90-247), 81 Stat. 816.
5. Carnine, D. W., Silbert, J., & Kameenui, E. J. (1997). Direct instruction reading (3rd ed.). Columbus: Prentice Hall.
6. Census 2000 Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File, Tables PL1 and PL2.
7. Cummins, J. (2000). Biliteracy, empowerment, and transformative pedagogy. In J. V. Tinajero & R. A. Devillar (Eds.), The power of two languages: Effective dual-language use across the curriculum (pp. 9-19). New York: McGraw-Hill.
8. Daly, E. J., Lentz, F. E., & Boyer, J. (1996). The instructional hierarchy: A conceptual model for understanding the effective components of reading interventions. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 369-386.
9. Daly, E. J., & Martens, B. K. (1994). A comparison of three interventions for improving oral reading performance: Application of the instructional hierarchy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 459-469.
10. Daly, E. J., Martens, B. K., Hamler, K. R., Dool, E. J., & Eckert, T. L. (1999). A brief experimental analysis for identifying instructional components needed to improve oral reading fluency. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 83-94.
11. Daly, E. J., Murdoch, A., Lillenstein, L., Webber, L., & Lentz, F. E. (2002). An examination of methods for testing treatments: Conducting brief experimental analyses of the effects of instructional components on oral reading fluency. Education and Treatment of Children, 25, 288-316.
12. Dufrene, B. A., Henington, C., & Townsend, A. E. (In press). Peer tutoring for reading fluency: Student implementation and effects on reading fluency. Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools.
13. Eckert, T. L., Ardoin, S. P., Daly, E. J., & Martens, B. K. (2002). Improving oral reading fluency: A brief experimental analysis of combining an antecedent intervention with consequences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 271-281.
14. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2005). Peer assisted learning strategies: Promoting word recognition, fluency, and reading comprehension in young children. The Journal of Special Education, 39, 34-44.
15. Guadalupe De la Colina, M., Parker, R. I., Hasbrouck, J. E., & Lara-Alecio, R. (2001). Intensive intervention in reading fluency for at-risk beginning Spanish readers. Bilingual Research Journal, 25, 417-450.
16. Haring, N. G., Lovitt, T. C., Eaton, M. D., & Hansen, C. L. (1978). The fourth R: Research in the classroom. Columbus: Merrill.
17. Hasbrouck, J. E., Ihnot, C., & Rogers, G. H. (1999). "Read Naturally": A strategy to increase oral reading fluency. Reading Research & Instruction, 39, 27-38.
18. Hintze, J. M., & Christ, T. J. (2004). An examination of variability as a function of passage variance in CBM progress monitoring. School Psychology Review, 33, 204-217.
19. Jones, K. M., & Wickstrom, K. F. (2002). Done in sixty seconds: Further analysis of the brief assessment model for academic problems. School Psychology Review, 31, 554-568.
20. Kaufman, P., Alt, M. N., & Chapman, C. D. (2000). Dropout Rates in the United States: 2000 (NCES 2002-114).
21. Martens, B. K., Witt, J. C., Elliott, S. N., & Darveaux, D. (1985). Teacher judgments concerning the acceptability of school-based interventions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 16, 191-198.
22. Mathes, P. G., Denton, C. A., Fletcher, J. M., Anthony, J. L., Francis, D. J., & Schatschneider, C. (2005). The effects of theoretically different instruction and student characteristics on the skills of struggling readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 148-182.
23. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
24. Noell, G. H., Gansle, K. A., Witt, J. C., Whitmarsh, E. L., Freeland, J. T., LaFleur, L. H., Gilberston, D. N., & Northup, J. (1998). Effects of contingent reward and instruction on oral reading performance at differing levels of passage difficulty. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 659-663.
25. Pearson, P. D., Johnson, D. D., Clymer, T., Indirsano, R., Venezky, R. L., Baumann, J. F., Hiebert, E., & Toth, M. (1989). Silver, Burdett, and Ginn. Needham: Silver, Burdett, and Ginn.
26. Saenz, L. M., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2005). Peer assisted learning strategies for English language learners with learning disabilities. Council for Exceptional Children, 71, 231-247.
27. Shapiro, E. S., (1996). Academic skill problems: Direct assessment and intervention (2nd ed.) New York: Guilford.
28. Shinn, M. R. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford.
29. Sindelar, P. T., Lane, H. B., Pullen, P. C., & Hudson, R. F. (2002). Remedial interventions for students with reading decoding problems. In M. R. Shinn, H. M. Walker, & G. Stoner (Eds.), interventions for academic and behavior problems II: Preventive and remedial approaches (pp. 703-730). Bethesda: National Association of School Psychologists.
30. Skinner, C. H., Cooper, L., & Cole, C. L. (1997). The effects of oral presentation previewing rates on reading performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 331-333.
31. Stokes, T. F., & Baer, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349-367.
32. Therrien, W. J. (2004). Fluency and comprehension gains as a result of repeated reading: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 252-261.
33. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, The condition of education, 2000.
34. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), NAEP 1999, Trends in academic progress: Three decades of student performance.
35. VanAuken, T. L., Chafouleas, S. M., Bradley, T. A., & Martens, B. K. (2002). Using brief experimental analysis to select oral reading interventions: An investigation of treatment utility. Journal of Behavioral Education, 11, 163-179.
36. Vaughn, S., Mathes, P. G., Linan-Thompson, S., & Francis, D. J. (2005). Teaching English Language Learners at risk for reading disabilities to read: Putting research into practice. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 20, 58-67.
37. Watson, T. S., & Robinson, S. L. (1996). Direct behavioral consultation: An alternative to traditional behavioral consultation. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 267-278.
38. Witt, J. C., & Elliott, S. N. (1985). Acceptability of classroom management strategies. In T. R. Kratochwill (Ed.), Advances in school psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 251-288). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.