The changing role of forests in the global carbon cycle: Responding to elevated carbon dioxide in the atmosphere

Climate Change and Global Food Security

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 187-222

  Delucia, Evan H ^a   Moore, David J ^a   Hamilton, Jason G ^b   Thomas, Richard B ^c   Springer, Clint J ^c   Norby, Richard J ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b ITHACA COLLEGE   (United States)

^c WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247397914     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (104)

1. 2 exchange to the canopy: a generalized model of forest photosynthesis validated by eddy correlation. Oecologia, 106:257-265.
2. Aber, J.D., S.V. Ollinger, C.A. Federer, et al. 1995. Predicting the effects of climate change on water yield and forest production in the northeastern United States. Climate Res., 5:207-222.
3. 2 enrichment. Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 15:149-162.
4. Andrews, J.A., K.G. Harrison, R. Matamala, and W.H. Schlesinger. 1999. Separation of root respiration from total soil respiration using carbon-13 labeling during free-air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE). Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 63:1429-1435.
5. Atkin, O.K. and M.G. Tjoelker. 2003. Thermal acclimation and dynamic response of plant respiration to temperature. Trends Plant Sci., 8:343-351.
6. Baldocchi, D.D. 2003. Assessing the eddy covariance technique for evaluating carbon dioxide exchange rates of ecosystems: past, present and future. Global Change Biol., 9:479-492.
7. Baldocchi, D.D., B.B. Hicks, and T.P. Meyer. 1988. Measuring biosphere-atmosphere exchanges of biologically related gases with micrometeorological methods. Ecology, 69:1331-1340.
8. Boone, R.D., P. Sollins, and K. Cromack Jr. 1988. Stand and soil changes along a mountain hemlock death and regrowth sequence. Ecology, 69:714-722.
9. Caspersen, J.P., S.W. Pacala, J.C. Jenkins, G.C. Hurtt, P.R. Moorcroft, and R.A. Birdsey. 2000. Contribution of land-use history to carbon accumulation in U.S. forests. Science, 290:1148-1151.
10. Clark, D.A., S. Brown, D.W. Kicklighter, J.Q. Chambers, J.R. Thomlinson, and J. Ni. 2001. Measuring net primary production in forests: concepts and field methods. Ecol. Appl., 11:356-370.
11. Curtis, P.S. 1996. A meta-analysis of leaf gas exchange and nitrogen in trees grown under elevated carbon dioxide. Plant Cell Environ., 19:127-137.
12. Curtis, P.S., P.J. Hanson, P. Bolstad, C. Barford, J.C. Randolph, H.P. Schmid, and K.B. Wilson. 2002. Biometric and eddy-covaraince based estimates of annual carbon sorage in five eastern North American deciduous forests. Agric. For. Meteorol., 113:3-19.
13. 2]. Plant Physiol.
14. 2 enrichment. Science, 284:1177-1179.
15. DeLucia, E.H., K. George, and J.G. Hamilton. 2002. Radiation-use efficiency of a forest exposed to elevated concentrations of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Tree Physiol., 22:1003-1010.
16. Dewar, R.C., B.E. Medlyn, and R.E. McMurtrey. 1999. Acclimation of the respiration/photosynthesis ratio to temperature: insights from a model. Global Change Biol., 5:615-622.
17. 2 exchange in a Florida scrub-oak ecosystem. Global Change Biol., 9:84-95.
18. 2. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 48:609-639.
19. 2 concentration. Plant Soil, 187:111-118.
20. 2 enrichment and elevated air temperature. Plant Soil, 206:85-97.
21. 2- enriched sweetgum trees. New Phytologist, 155:239-248.
22. 2 exchange and water status in the canopy affected? Plant Cell Environ., 22:461-472.
23. Fan, S., M. Gloor, J. Mahlman, S. Pacala, J. Sarmiento, T. Takahashi, and P. Tans. 1998. A large terrestrial carbon sink in North America implied by atmospheric and oceanic carbon dioxide data and models. Science, 282:442-446.
24. Field, C.B. 2001. Plant physiology of the “missing” carbon sink. Plant Physiol., 125:25-28.
25. Field, C.B., M.J. Behrenfeld, J.T. Anderson, and P. Falkowski. 1998. Primary production of the biosphere: integrating terrestrial and oceanic components. Science, 281:237-240.
26. 2 enrichment. Ecology, 82:470-484.
27. 2 enrichment. Oecologia, 132:567-578.
28. 2. New Phytologist, 160:511-522.
29. Grier, C.C., K.A. Vogt, M.R. Keyes, and R.L. Edmonds. 1981. Biomass distribution and above- and below-ground production in young and mature Abies amabilis zone ecosystems of the Washington Cascades. Can. J. For. Res., 11:155-167.
30. Groninger, J.W., K.H. Johnsen, J.R. Seiler, R.E. Will, D.S. Ellsworth, and C.A. Maier. 1999. Implications of elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide for loblolly pine plantation management and productivity. J. For., 97:4-10.
31. 2. Oecologia, 131:250-260.
32. 2 on leaf respiration in a forest ecosystem. Plant Cell Environ., 24:975-982.
33. Hanson, P.J., N.T. Edwards, C.T. Garten, and J.A. Andrews. 2000. Separating root and soil microbial contributions to soil respiration: a review of methods and observations. Biogeochemistry, 48:115-146.
34. 2. Global Change Biol., 5:293-309.
35. Hendrey, G.R. and B.A. Kimball. 1994. The FACE program. Agric. For. Meteorol., 70:3-14.
36. Hertel, D. and C. Leuschner. 2002. A comparison of four different fine root production estimates with ecosystem carbon balance data in a Fagus-Quercus mixed forest. Plant Soil, 239:237-251.
37. Houghton, J.T., L.G. Meira Filho, J. Bruce, et al., Eds. 1996. Climate Change 1995: Impacts, Adaptations and Mitigation of Climate Change. Scientific-Technical Analyses. Cambridge University Press, London; New York.
38. Houghton, J.T., Y. Ding, D.J. Griggs, et al., Eds. 2001. Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Third Assessment Report. Cambridge University Press, London; New York.
39. 2enrichment. Global Change Biol., 5:493-495.
40. International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme Terrestrial Carbon Working Group. 1998. The terrestrial carbon cycle: implications for the Kyoto Protocol. Science, 280:1393-1394.
41. Jackson, R.B., H.A. Mooney, and E.-D. Schulze. 1997. A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 94:7362-7366.
42. 2emissions. Science, 300:1538-1542.
43. 2 on nutrient cycling in a sweetgum plantation. Biogeochemistry, 69:379-403.
44. Joos, F., I.C. Prentice, and J.I. House. 2002. Growth enhancement due to global atmospheric change as predicted by terrestrial ecosystem models: consistent with US forest inventory data. Global Change Biol., 8:299-303.
45. Keever, C. 1950. Causes of succession on old fields of the Piedmont, North Carolina. Ecol. Monogr., 20:231-250.
46. Kelting, D.L., J.A. Burger, and G.S. Edwards. 1998. Estimating root respiration, microbial respiration in the rhizosphere, and rootfree soil respiration in forest soils. Soil Biol. Biochem., 30:961-968.
47. 2 fertilization to affect the global carbon budget: a comparison of four terrestrial biosphere models. Tellus, 51:343-366.
48. 2 enrichment. Adv. Agron., 77:293-368.
49. Lichter, J. 1998. Primary succession and forest development on coastal Lake Michigan sand dunes. Ecol. Monogr., 4:487-510.
50. Lieth, H. and R.H. Whittaker, Eds. 1975. The Primary Productivity of the Biosphere. Ecological Studies 14. Springer, New York.
51. 2 concentrations. In N.R. Baker, and H. Thomas, Eds. Topics in Photosynthesis. Crop Photosynthesis: Spatial and Temporal Determinants, vol. 2. Amsterdam, Elsevier, pp. 69-107.
52. 2 concentrations: has its importance been underestimated? Plant Cell Environ., 14:729-739.
53. 2 atmosphere in maize leaves. Aust. J. Plant Physiol., 28:1103-1108.
54. 2 enrichment experiment and eddycovariance measurements. Ecol. Appl., 11:239-252.
55. Luo, Y., L.W. White, J.G. Canadell, E.H. DeLucia, D.S. Ellsworth, A. Finzi, J. Lichter, and W.H. Schlesinger. 2003. Sustainability of terrestrial carbon sequestration: a case study in Duke Forest with inversion approach. Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 17:1021.
56. Makela, A. and H.T. Valentine. 2001. The ratio of NPP and GPP: evidence of change over the course of stand development. Tree Physiol., 21:1015-1030.
57. Matamala, R., M.A. Gonzalez-Meler, J.D. Jastrow, R.J. Norby, and W.H. Schlesinger. 2003. Impacts of fine root turnover on forest NPP and soil C sequestration potential. Science, 302:1385-1387.
58. McLeod, A.R. and S.P. Long. 1999. Free-air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE) in global change research: a review. Adv. Ecol. Res., 28:1-55.
59. 2 concentration: a synthesis. New Phytologist, 149:247-264.
60. Meir, P. and J. Grace. 2002. Scaling relationships for woody tissue respiration in two tropical rain forests. Plant Cell Environ., 25:963-973.
61. 2 enrichment) system on bog ecosystems in northern and central Europe. Environ. Monitoring Assessment, 66:107-127.
62. Moore, D., E. DeLucia, and R. Norby. 2004. Unpublished data.
63. Myers, D.A., R.B. Thomas, and E.H. DeLucia. 1999. Photosynthetic capacity of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) trees during the first year of carbon dioxide enrichment in a forest ecosystem. Plant Cell Environ., 22:473-481.
64. Nadelhoffer, K.J. and J.W. Raich. 1992. Fine root production estimates and belowground carbon allocation in forest ecosystems. Ecology, 73:1139-1147.
65. 2. Global Change Biol., 5:609-614.
66. 2-enriched deciduous forest and the implications for carbon storage. Ecol. Appl., 12:1261-1266.
67. 2-enriched sweetgum stand. New Phytologist, 150:477-487.
68. 2. Oecologia, 136:574-584.
69. Nowak, R.S., D.S. Ellsworth, and S.D. Smith. 2004. Tansley Review: Functional responses of plants to elevated atmospheric CO2: Do photosynthetic and productivity data from FACE experiments support early predictions? New Phytologist, 162:253-280.
70. O’Connell, K.E.B., S.T. Gower, and J.M. Norman. 2003. Net ecosystem production of two contrasting boreal black spruce forest communities. Ecosystems, 6:248-260.
71. 2 and water vapour fluxes in the Great Basin. Global Change Biol., 9:563-574.
72. 2 injection: system description. New Phytologist, 150:251-260.
73. 2-enriched atmosphere. Nature, 411:469-472.
74. Pacala, S.W., G.C. Hurtt, D. Baker, et al. 2001. Consistent land- and atmosphere-based U.S. carbon sink estimates. Science, 292:2316-2320.
75. Prentice, I.C., et al. 2001. The carbon cycle and atmospheric carbon dioxide. In Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, London; New York, pp. 183-238.
76. Publicover, D.A. and K.A. Vogt. 1993. A comparison of methods for estimating forest fine root production with respect to sources of error. Can. J. For. Res., 23:1179-1186.
77. Randerson, J.T., F.S. Chapin III, J.W. Harden, J.C. Neff, and M.E. Harmon. 2002. Net ecosystem production: a comprehensive measure of net carbon accumulation by ecosystems. Ecol. Appl., 12:937-947.
78. Ryan, M.G. 1995. Foliar maintenance respiration of subalpine and boreal trees and shrubs in relation to nitrogen content. Plant Cell Environ., 18:765-772.
79. Ryan, M.G., R.M. Hubbard, S. Pongracic, R.J. Raison, and R.E. McMurtrie. 1996. Foliage, fine-root, woody-tissue and stand respiration in Pinus radiatia in relation to nitrogen status. Tree Physiology, 16:333-343.
80. Santantonio, D. and J.C. Grace. 1987. Estimating fine-root production and turnover from biomas and decomposition data - a compartment flow model. Can. J. For. Res., 17:900-908.
81. 2 atmosphere alters carbon assimilation and allocation in a pine forest ecosystem. Global Change Biol., 9:1378-1400.
82. 2 concentration. Global Change Biol., 8:895-911.
83. 2 and climate to carbon storage by ecosystems in the United States. Science, 287:2004-2006.
84. Schimel, D.S., J.I. House, K.A. Hibbard, et al. 2001. Recent patterns and mechanisms of carbon exchange by terrestrial ecosystems. Nature, 414:169-172.
85. Schlesinger, W.H. 1997. Biogeochemistry: An Analysis of Global Change. Academic Press, New York.
86. 2. Nature, 411:66-469.
87. Schulze, E.-D. and M. Heimann. 1988. Carbon and water exchange of terrestrial ecosystems. In J. Galloway and J.M. Melillo, Eds. Asian Change in the Context of Global Change. Cambridge University Press, London; New York, pp. 145-161.
88. 2 flux in wet sedge tundras: responses to nutrients, temperature and light. Ecol. Monogr., 68:75-97.
89. Springer, C.J. and Thomas, R.B. 2004. Unpublished data.
90. 2 and Plants. The Response of Plants to Rising Levels of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
91. Teskey, R.O. and M.A. McGuire. 2002. Carbon dioxide transport in xylem causes errors in estimation of rates of respiration in stems and branches of trees. Plant Cell Environ., 25:1571-1577.
92. Tissue, D.T., J.D. Lewis, S.D. Wullschleger, J.S. Amthor, K.L. Griffen, and R. Anderson. 2002. Leaf respiration at different canopy positions in sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) grown in ambient and elevated concentrations of carbon dioxide in the field. Tree Physiology, 22:1157-1166.
93. Valentini, R., G. Matteucci, A.J. Dolman, E-D. Schulze, C. Rebmann, E.J. Moors, et al. 2000. Respiration as the main determinant of carbon balance in European forests. Nature, 404:861-865.
94. von Caemmerer, S. 2000. Biochemical Models of Leaf Photosynthesis. Techniques in Plant Sciences 2. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Collingwood, VIC, Australia.
95. 2 concentration on leaf dark respiration of Xanthium strumarium in light and in darkness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 98:2479-2484.
96. Waring, R.H. and N. McDowell. 2002. Use of a physiological process model with forestry yield tables to set limits on annual carbon balances. Tree Physiology, 22:179-188.
97. Waring, R.H., J.J. Landsberg, and M. Williams. 1998. Net primary production of forests: a constant fraction of gross primary production? Tree Physiology, 18:129-134.
98. Whittaker, R.H. 1975. Communities and Ecosystems, 2nd ed. Macmillan, New York.
99. Wiant, H.V. 1967. Has the contribution of liter decay to forest soil respiration been overestimated? J. For., 65:408-409.
100. 2 in a midlatitude forest. Science, 260:1314-1317.
101. Woodwell, G.M. and R.H. Whittaker. 1968. Primary production in terrestrial ecosystems. Am. Zoologist, 8:19-30.
102. 2 and feedback between carbon and nitrogen cycles. Plant Soil, 151:105-117.
103. 2: a synthesis of forest FACE experiments. Ecol. Appl., 13:1508-1514.
104. Zelitch, I. 1973. Plant productivity and the control of photorespiration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70:579-84.