Effects of training in universal design for learning on lesson plan development

Remedial and Special Education

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 108-116

  Spooner, Fred ^a,b,c   Baker, Joshua N ^d   Harris, Amber A ^d   Ahlgrim Delzell, Lynn ^a   Browder, Diane M ^a,e,f  

^a Department of Special Education ^*

^b Institute for Education   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

^d Department of Educational Psychology   (United States)

^e UNCC

^f National Center on Alternate Assessment

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247353742     PISSN: 07419325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/07419325070280020101     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Assistive Technology Act of 1998, 29 U.S.C. § 3001 et seq.
2. Blum, H. T., Lipsett, L. R., & Yocom, D. J. (2002). Literature circles: A tool for self-determination in one middle school inclusive classroom. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 99-113.
3. Browder, D., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Flowers, C., Karvonen, M., Spooner, F., & Algozzine, R. (2005). How states implement alternate assessment for students with disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 15, 209-220.
4. Burgstahler, S. (2001). Universal design of instruction. Retrieved October 10, 2004, from http://www.washington.edu/doit/Brochures/Academics/ instruction.html
5. Burns, M., Storey, K., & Certo, N. J. (1999). Effect of service learning on attitudes towards students with severe disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 34, 58-65.
6. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp.). Chicago: Rand McNally.
7. Cawley, J. F., Foley, T. E., & Miller, J. (2003). Science and students with mild disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 38, 160-172.
8. Center for Applied Special Technology. (1998). What is universal design for learning? Wakefield, MA: Author. Retrieved July 11, 2005, from http://www.cast.org/research/udl/index.html
9. Hitchcock, C. (2001). Balanced instructional support and challenge in universally designed learning environments. Journal of Special Education Technology, 16, 23-30.
10. Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. (2002). Providing new access to the general curriculum: Universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8-17.
11. Huber, K. D., Rosenfeld, J. G., & Fiorello, C. A. (2001). The differential impact of inclusion and inclusive practices on high, average, and low achieving general education students. Psychology in the Schools, 38, 497-504.
12. Hunt, P., & Goetz, L. (1997). Research on inclusive educational programs, practices, and outcomes for students with severe disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 31, 3-31.
13. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1997, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
14. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004) (reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990)
15. Kennedy, C. H., Shukla, S., & Fryxell, D. (1997). Comparing the effects of educational placement on the social relationships of intermediate school students with severe disabilities. Exceptional Children, 64, 31-47.
16. Mancini, K. G., & Layton, C. A. (2004). Meeting fears and concerns effectively: The inclusion of early childhood students who are medically fragile. Physical Disabilities: Education and Related Services, 22(2), 29-48.
17. McDonnell, J., Mathot-Buckner, C., Thorson, N., & Fister, S. (2001). Supporting the inclusion of students with moderate and severe disabilities in junior high school general education classes: The effects of classwide peer tutoring, multi-element curriculum, and accommodations. Education and Treatment of Children, 24, 141-160.
18. McLeskey, J., Henry, D., & Axelrod, M. I. (1999). Inclusion of students with learning disabilities: An examination of data from reports to congress. Exceptional Children, 66, 55-66.
19. McLeskey, J., Waldron, N. L., So, T. H., Swanson, K., & Loveland, T. (2001). Perspectives of teachers toward inclusive school programs. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24, 108-115.
20. Mu, K., Siegel, E. B., & Allinder, R. M. (2000). Peer interactions and sociometric status of high school students with moderate or severe disabilities in general education classrooms. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 25, 142-152.
21. National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum. (1999). CAST universal design for learning: Policy and practice. Wakefield, MA: Center for Applied Special Technology. Retrieved February 9, 2006, from http://www.cast.org/policy/ncac/index.html
22. O'Connell, K. (2001). Looking at textbooks: Universal design for learning: Associate editor's column. Journal of Special Education Technology, 16, 57-58.
23. Odom, S. L., Brantlinger, E., Gersten, R., Horner, R. H., Thompson, B., & Harris, K. R. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71, 137-148.
24. Orkwis, R. (2003). Universally designed instruction. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED468709)
25. Praisner, C. L. (2003). Attitudes of elementary school principals toward the inclusion of students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69, 135-145.
26. Polloway, E. A., & Bursuck, W. D. (1996). Treatment acceptability: Determining appropriate interventions within inclusive classrooms. Intervention in School and Clinic, 31, 133-144.
27. Rose, D. (2001). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 16, 66-67.
28. Rose, D., & Dolan, B. (2000). Universal design for learning: Associate editor's column. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15, 47-51.
29. Rose, D., & Meyer, A. (2002). The future is in the margins: The role of technology and disability in educational reform. Washington, DC: Department of Education, American Institutes for Research. Retrieved October 15, 2004, from http://www.cast.org/udl/UniversalDesignforLearning362.cfm
30. Ryndak, D. L., Jackson, L., & Billingsley, F. (2000). Defining school inclusion for students with moderate to severe disabilities: What do experts say? Exceptionality, 8, 101-116.
31. Schumm, J. S., & Vaughn, S. (1995). Meaningful professional development in accommodating students with disabilities: Lessons learned. Remedial and Special Education, 16, 344-355.
32. Shavelson, R. J., & Towne, L. (Eds.). (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
33. Smith, M. G. (2000). Secondary teachers' perceptions toward inclusion of students with severe disabilities. NASSP Bulletin, 84, 54-60.
34. Spooner, F., & Browder, D. M. (2003). Scientifically based research in education and students with low incidence disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 28, 117-125.
35. Waldron, N. L., & McLeskey, J. (1998). The effects of an inclusive school program on students with mild and severe learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 64, 395-405.
36. Witzel, B. S., Mercer, C. D., & Miller, M. D. (2003). Teaching algebra to students with learning difficulties: An investigation of an explicit instruction model. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 121-131.