The differential impact of inclusion and inclusive practices on high, average, and low achieving general education students

Psychology in the Schools

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 497-504

  Huber, Karl D ^a   Rosenfeld, Joseph G ^a   Fiorello, Catherine A ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035498104     PISSN: 00333085     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pits.1038     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Affleck, J., Madge, S., Adams, A., & Lowenbraun, S. (1988). Integrated classroom versus resource model: Academic viability and effectiveness. Exceptional Children, 54, 339-348.
2. Brown, F.G. (1992). Review of the Stanford Achievement Test, eighth edition. In J.J. Kramer & J.C. Conoley (Eds.), The eleventh mental measurements yearbook (pp. 861-863). Nebraska: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement.
3. Cook, B., Semmel, M., & Gerber, M. (1995, April). Are recent reforms effective for all children? Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
4. Goolsby, T.M. (undated). Important considerations in achievement test selection for diagnosis and guidance. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 046 992).
5. Fuller, M., Running, M., VanVoorhis, J., & Moore, M. (1993, August). Restructuring for student success in a rural school: Preliminary analyses. Poster session presented at the American Psychological Association convention, Toronto, Canada.
6. Gerber, M. (1995). Inclusion at the high-water mark? Some thoughts on Zigmond and Baker's case studies of inclusive educational programs. The Journal of Special Education, 29, 181-191.
7. Jenkins, R., Jewell, M., Leicester, N., Jenkins, L., & Troutner, N. (1991). Development of a school building model for educating students with handicaps and at-risk students in general classrooms. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 311-320.
8. Kavale, K. (1990). Effectiveness of special education. In T. Gutkin & C. Reynolds (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology. New York: John Wiley.
9. Liddiard, H. (1991). The academic achievement of second, third, and fourth grade regular education students, involved in special education inclusion programs. Unpublished manuscript, Eastern Michigan University.
10. Madden, N., Slavin, R., Karweit, N., Dolan, L., & Wasik, B. (1993). Success for all: Longitudinal effects of a restructuring program for inner-city elementary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 123-148.
11. Manset, G., & Semmel, M. (1997). Are inclusive programs for students with mild disabilities effective? A comparative review of model programs. The Journal of Special Education, 31, 155-180.
12. McLeskey, J., & Waldron, N. (1995). Inclusive elementary programs: Must they cure students with learning disabilities to be effective? Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 300-303.
13. McLeskey, J., Henry, D., & Axelrod, M. (1999). Inclusion of students with learning disabilities: An examination of data from reports to Congress. Exceptional Children, 66, 53-66.
14. Nitko, A.J. (1989). Review of the Metropolitan Achievement Test, sixth edition. In J.C. Conoley & J.J. Kramer (Eds.), The tenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 510-515). Nebraska: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement.
15. Rogers, B.G. (1989). Review of the Metropolitan Achievement Test, sixth edition. In J.C. Conoley & J.J. Kramer (Eds.), The tenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 515-519). Nebraska: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement.
16. Saint-Laurent, L., Dionne, J., Giasson, J., Royer, E., Simard, C., & Pierard, B. (1998). Academic achievement effects of an in-class service model on students with and without disabilities. Exceptional Children, 64, 239-253.
17. Semmel, M., & Gerber, M. (1990). If at first you don't succeed, bye bye again: A response to general educators' views on the REI. Remedial and Special Education, 11, 53-59.
18. Semmel, M., Gerber, M., & MacMillan, D. (1994). Twenty-five years after Dunn's article: A legacy of policy analysis research in special education. The Journal of Special Education, 27, 481-495.
19. Sharpe, M., York, J., & Knight, J. (1994). Effects of inclusion on the academic performance of classmates without disabilities: A preliminary study. Remedial and Special Education, 15, 281-287.
20. Slavin, R., & Madden, N. (1983). Mainstreaming students with mild handicaps: Academic and social outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 53, 519-569.
21. Werts, M.G., Wolery, M., Snyder, E.D., Caldwell, N.K., & Salisbury, C.L. (1996). Supports and resources associated with inclusive schooling: Perceptions of elementary school teachers about need and availability. Journal of Special Education, 30(2), 187-203.
22. Willrodt, K., & Claybrook, S. (1995). Effects of inclusion on academic outcomes. Unpublished manuscript, Sam Houston State University.
23. Yell, M. (1995). Least restrictive environment, inclusion, and students with disabilities: A legal analysis. The Journal of Special Education, 28, 389-404.
24. Zigmond, N., Jenkins, J., Fuchs, L., Deno, S., Fuchs, D., Baker, N., Jenkins, L., & Couthino, M. (1995). Restructured schools: Findings from three multi-year studies. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 531-540.