Science and Students with Mild Disabilities: Principles of Universal Design

Intervention in School and Clinic

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 160-171

  Cawley, John F ^a   Foley, Teresa E ^a   Miller, James ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW ORLEANS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2142806011     PISSN: 10534512     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/10534512030380030501     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993a). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993b). Science for all Americans: Project 2061, Washington, DC: Author.
3. Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities and the Early Intervention Program for Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities: Final Regulations. 34 C.F.R. § 300.26 (1999).
4. Atwood, R. K., & Oldham, B. R. (1985). Teacher's perceptions of main-streaming in an inquiry-oriented elementary science program. Science Education, 69, 619-624.
5. Bredderman, T. (1982). The effects of activity-based science in elementary schools. In M. Rowe & W. Higuchi (Eds.), Education in the 80's (pp. 63-75). Washington, DC: National Education Association.
6. Cawley, J., Miller, J., Sentman, R., & Bennett, S. (1999). Science for all children. Unpublished curriculum study. Buffalo: State University of New York at Buffalo.
7. Champagne, A., & Bunce, D. (1989, April). Electricity in 6th grade tests: Too much, too fast. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
8. Darch, C., & Carnine, D. (1986). Teaching content area material to learning disabled students. Exceptional Children, 53, 240-246.
9. Eggin, P., & Main, J. (1990). Developing critical thinking through science: Book two. Pacific Grove, CA: Midwest Publications.
10. Gersten, R., & Baker, S. (1998). Real world use of scientific concepts: Integrating situated cognition with explicit instruction. Exceptional Children, 65, 23-36.
11. Lovitt, T., & Horton, S. (1994). Strategies for adapting science textbooks for youth with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 15, 105-106.
12. Lowery, L. F. (1992). The biological basis of thinking and learning. Berkeley: University of California.
13. Mastropieri, M., & Scruggs, T. (1992). A program to guide science for students with disabilities. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University.
14. National Research Council. (1994). National science standards. Washington, DC: Author.
15. Orkwis, R. (1999). Curriculum access and universal design. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
16. Orkwis, R., & McLane, K. (1998). A curriculum every student can use: Design principles for student access. Topical brief. Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
17. Ormsbee, C. K., & Finson, K. D. (2000). Modifying science activities and materials to enhance instruction for students with learning and behavior problems. Intervention in School and Clinic, 36, 10-21.
18. Parmar, R., & Cawley, J. (1993). Analysis of science recommendations in school textbooks. Exceptional Children, 59, 518-531.
19. Raizen, S. (1988). Increasing educational productivity through improving science. Washington, DC: The National Center for Improving Science Education.
20. Roth, K.J. (1989). Science education; It's not enough to "do" or "elate." American Educator, 13, 16-22, 46-48.
21. Scruggs, T., & Mastropieri, M. (1994). The construction of scientific knowledge by students with mild disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 28, 307-321.
22. Scruggs, T., Mastropieri, M., Bakken, J., & Brigham, F. (1993). Reading versus doing: The relative effects of textbook-based and inquiry-oriented approaches to science learning in special education classrooms. The Journal of Special Education, 27, 1-15.
23. Shymansky, J., Kyle, W., & Alport, J. (1982). How effective were the hands-on science programs of yesterday? Science and Children, 20, 14-15.
24. Staver, J. R., & Bay, M. (1989). Analysis of the conceptual structures and reasoning demands of elementary science texts at the primary level. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, 329-349.