Supervised consensus scoring for docking and virtual screening

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 526-534

  Teramoto, Reiji ^a   Fukunishi, Hiroaki ^a  

^a NEC CORPORATION   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINDING SITES; COMPLEXATION; CONFORMATIONS; DATABASE SYSTEMS; LIGANDS; PROTEINS;

CONSENSUS SCORING (CS); ENERGY FUNCTIONS; PROTEIN FLEXIBILITY; SUPERVISED CONSENSUS SCORING (SCS);

SUPERVISED LEARNING;

LIGAND; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; CONFORMATION; METABOLISM; PROTEIN BINDING;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; LIGANDS; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS;

EID: 34247262566     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci6004993     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Kuntz, I. D.; Blaney, J. M.; Oatley, S. J.; Sheridan, R. P.; Langridge, R.; Ferrin, T. E. A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 1982, 161, 269-288.
2. Abagyan, R. A.; Totrov, M. M.; Kuznetsov, D. A. ICM: a new method for structure modeling and design: applications to docking and structure prediction from the distorted native conformation. J. Comput. Chem. 1994, 15, 488-506.
3. Rarey, M.; Kramer, B.; Lengauer, T.; Klebe. G. A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. J. Mol Biol. 1996, 267, 470-89.
4. Welch. W.; Ruppert. J.; Jain, A. N. Hammerhead: fast, fully automated docking of flexible ligands to protein binding sites. Chem. Biol. 1996. 3, 449-462.
5. Jones, O.; Wilett, P.: Glen. R. C.; Leach, A. R.; Taylor, R. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 267, 727-748.
6. McMartin, C.; Bohacek, R. QXP: Powerful, rapid computer algorithms for structure-based drug design. J. Comput.-Aided Mol Des. 1997. 11, 333-344.
7. Morris, G. M.; Goodsell, D. S.; Halliday, R.: Huey, R.; Hart, W. E.: Belew, R. K.; Olson, A. J. Automated docking using a lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. J. Comput. Chem. 1998, 19, 1639-1662.
8. Baxter, C. A.; Murray, C. W.; Clark, D. E.; Westhead, D. R.; Eldridge. M. D. Flexible docking using Tabu search and an empirical estimate of binding affinity. Proteins 1998, 33, 367-382.
9. Hou, T.; J., W.; Chen, L.; Xu, X. Automated docking of peptides and proteins by using a genetic algorithm combined with a tabu search. Protein Eng. 1999, 12, 639-647.
10. Liu, M.; Wang, S. MCDOCK: a Monte Carlo simulation approach to the molecular docking problem. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1999. 13, 435-451.
11. Perola, E.; Xu, K.; Kollmeyer, T. M.; Kaufmann, S. H.; Prendergast, F. G.; Pang, Y. P. Successful virtual screening of a chemical database for farnesyltransferase inhibitor leads. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 401 -408.
12. Ewing, T. J.; Makino, S.; Skiliman, A. G.; Kuntz, I. D. DOCK 4.0: search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases. J. Comput.-Aided. Mol. Des. 2001, 15, 411-428.
13. Zavodszky, M. I.; Sanschagrin, P. C.; Korde, R. S.; Kuhn, L. A. Distilling the essential features of a protein surface for improving protein, ligand docking, scoring, and virtual screening. J. Comput.-Aided. Mol Des. 2002, 16, 883-902.
14. Jain, A. N. Surflex: fully automatic flexible molecular docking using a molecular similarity-based search engine. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46. 499-511.
15. Friesner, R. A.; Banks, J. L.; Murphy, R. B.; Halgren, T. A.; Klicic. J. J.; Mainz, D. T.; Repasky, M. P.; Knoll, E. H.; Shelley, M.; Perry, J. K.; Shaw, D. E.; Francis, P.; Shenkin, P. S. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 1739-1749.
16. Kellenberger, E.; Rodrigo, J.; Muller, P.; Rognan, D. Comparative evaluation of eight docking tools for docking and virtual screening accuracy. Proteins 2004, 57, 225-242.
17. Perola, E.; Walters, W. P.; Charifson, P. S. A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance. Proteins 2004, 57, 225-242.
18. Kontoyianni, M.; McClellan, L. M.; Sokol, G. S. Evaluation of docking performance: Comparative data on docking algorithms. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 56, 558-565.
19. Kroemer, R. T.; Vulpetti, A.; McDonald, J. J.; Rohrer, D. C.; Trosset. J. Y.; Giordanetto, F.; Cotesta, S.; McMartin, C.: Kihlen, M.; Stouten. P. F. W. Assessment of docking poses: Interactions-based accuracy classification (IBAC) versus crystal structure deviations. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 871-881.
20. Kontoyianni, M.; Sokol, G. S.; McClellan, L. M. Evaluation of library ranking efficacy in virtual screening. J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26, 11 -22.
21. Majeux, N.; Scarsi, M.; Apostolakis, J.; Caisch, A. Exhaustive docking of molecular fragments on protein binding sites with electrostatic salvation. Proteins: Struct., Funct. Genet. 1999, 37, 88-105.
22. Zou, X.: Sun, Y.; Kuntz. I. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999. 121, 8033-8043.
23. DeWitte, R.; Shakhnovich, E. SMoG: de novo design method based on simple, fast, and accurate free energy estimates. 1. Methodology and supporting evidence. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 11733-11744.
24. Mitchell. J. B. O.; Laskowski, R. A.; Alexander. A.; Thornton. J. M. BLEEP-Poteintial of mean force describing protein-ligand interactions: I. Generating potential. J. Comput. Chem. 1999, 20, 1165-1176.
25. Muegge, I.; Martin, Y. C.: A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: A simplified potential approach. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 791-804.
26. Gohlke, H.; Hendlich, M.; Klebe, G. Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions. J. Mol Biol. 2000, 295. 337-356.
27. Warren. G. L.; Andrews, C. W.; Capelli, A. M.; Clarke, B.; Lalonde, J.; Lambert, M. H.; Lindvalee, M.; Nevins, N.; Semus, S. F.; Senquer, S.; Tedesco, G.: Wall, I. D.; Woolven, J. M.; Peishoff, C. E.; Head, M. S. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 5912-5931.
28. Wang. R.; Lu, Y.; Wang, S. Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 2287-2303.
29. Charifson, P. S.; Corkery, J. J.; Murcko, M. A.; Walters, W. P. Consensus scoring: A method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 5100-5109.
30. Bissantz, C.; Folkers, G.; Rognan, D. Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases: 1. Evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 4759-4767.
31. Stahl, M.; Rarey, M.; Detailed, analysis of scoring functions for virtual screening. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 1035-1042.
32. Clark, R. D.; Strizhev, A.; Leonard, J. M.; Blake, J. F.; Matthew, J. B. Consensus scoring for ligand/protein interactions. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2002, 20, 281-295.
33. Verdonk, M. L.; Berdini, V.; Hartshorn, M. J.; Mooij, W. T. M.; Murray, C. W.; Taylor, T. D.; Watson, P. Virtual screening using protein-ligand docking: Avoiding artificial enrichment. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 793-806.
34. Yang, J. M.; Chen, Y. F.; Shen, T. W.; Kristal, B. S; Hsu, D. F. Consensus scoring criteria for improving enrichment in virtual screening. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2005, 45, 1134-1146.
35. Breiman, L. Random forests. Machine Learning 2001, 45, 5-32.
36. Chen, C.; Liaw, L.; Breiman, L. Using random forest to learn imbalanced data; Technical Report 666; Statistics Department, University of California at Berkeley: 2004.
37. Svetnik, V.; Liaw, A.; Tong, C.; Culberson, C.; Sheridan, R.; Feuston. B. Random Forest: A classification and regression tool for compound classification and QSAR modeling. J. Chem. Inf. Model 2003, 43. 1947-1958.
38. Breiman, L. Out-of-estimator; Technical Report; Department of Statistics, UC Berkeley: 1996.
39. Hastie, T.; Tibshirani, R.; Friedman, J. The element of statistical learning; Springer: 2001.
40. Wely, F.; Vaidehi, N.; Zamanakos, G.; Goddard, W.; HierVLS hierarchical docking protocol for virtual ligand screening of large-molecule databases. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 56-71.
41. Gruneberg, S.; Stubbs, M.; Klebe, G.; Successful, virtual screening for novel inhibitors of human carbonic anhydrase: strategy and experimental confirmation. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 3588-3602.
42. Camacho, C. J.; Vajda, S. Protein docking along smooth association pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98, 10636-10641.
43. Bryngelson, J. D.; Onuchic, J. N.: Socci, N. D.; Wolynes, P. G. Funnels, Pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: a synthesis. Proteins 1995, 21, 167-195.