Effective cyclic energy as a measure of seismic demand

Journal of Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 725-751

  Kalkan, Erol ^a,b   Kunnath, Sashi K ^a  

^a University of California   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cyclic Energy; Input Energy; Near Fault Records; Seismic Demand; Severity Index

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETERS; CORRELATION METHODS; CYCLIC LOADS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; SEISMOLOGY;

CYCLIC ENERGY; INPUT ENERGY; NEAR-FAULT RECORDS; SEISMIC DEMAND; SEVERITY INDEX;

SEISMIC DESIGN;

EID: 34247207277     PISSN: 13632469     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13632460601033827     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), [2000]. Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA-356, Washington D.C.
2. Amiri, G. G. and Dana, F. M. [2005], "Introduction of the most suitable parameter for selection of critical earthquake," Computers & Structures, 83(8-9), 613-26.
3. Applied Technology Council (ATC) [1996]. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, Volumes 1 and 2, Report No: ATC-40, Redwood City, CA.
4. Applied Technology Council (ATC) [2005]. "FEMA-440: Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures," Prepared by ATC (ATC-55 Project) for FEMA, Washington D.C.
5. Boore, D. M., Joyner, W. B., and Fumai, T. E. [1997]. "Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from western North American earthquakes: A summary of recent work," Seismology Research Letters, 68, 128-153.
6. Boore, D. M. [2001]. "Effect of baseline corrections on displacements and response spectra for several recordings of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake," Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 91(5), 1199-1211.
7. Bray, J. D. and Rodriguez-Marek, A. [2004]. "Characterization of forward-directivity ground motions in the near-fault region," Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 24, 815-828.
8. Chopra A. K. and Chintanapakdee C. [2001]. "Comparing response of SDF systems to near-fault and far-fault earthquake motions in the context of spectral regions," Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 30(2), 1769-1789.
9. Chintanapakdee, C. and Chopra, A. K. [2003]. "Evaluation of modal pushover analysis using generic frames," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 32(3), 417-442.
10. Chou, C. C. and Uang, C. [2003]. "A procedure for evaluating seismic energy demand of framed structures," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 32, 229-44.
11. Decanini, L. D. and Mollaioli, F. [2001]. "An energy-based methodology for the assessment of seismic demand," Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 21(2), 113-37.
12. Fajfar, P. [1992]. "Equivalent ductility factors, taking into account low-cycle fatigue," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 23, 507-21.
13. Fajfar, P. and Vidic, T. [1994]. "Consistent inelastic design spectra: hysteretic and input energy," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 23, 523-37.
14. Gupta, B. and Kunnath, S. K. [1998]. "Effect of hysteretic model parameters on inelastic seismic demands," Proceedings of 6th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Seattle, WA.
15. Hernandez-Montes, E., Kwon, O. S., and Aschheim., M. A. [2004], "An energy based formulation for first and multiple-mode nonlinear static (Pushover) analyses," Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 8(1), 69-88.
16. Kalkan, E. [2006], Prediction of seismic demand in building structures, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California at Davis.
17. Kalkan, E. and Gülkan, P. "Site-dependent spectra derived from ground motion records in Turkey," Earthquake Spectra, 20(4), 1111-1138.
18. Kalkan, E. and Kunnath, S. K. [2006a], "Effects of fling-step and forward directivity on the seismic response of buildings," Earthquake Spectra, 22(2), 367-390.
19. Kalkan, E. and Kunnath, S. K. [2006b]. "Adaptive modal combination procedure for nonlinear static analysis of building structures," Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 132(11), 1721-1732.
20. Kalkan, E. and Kunnath, S. K. [2007a]. "Relevance of absolute and relative energy content in seismic evaluation of structures," Advances in Structural Engineering, (in press).
21. Kalkan, E. and Kunnath, S. K. [2007b]. "Assessment of current nonlinear static procedures for seismic evaluation of buildings," Engineering Structures. 29(3), 305-316.
22. Kunnath, S. K. and Kalkan, E. [2004]. "Evaluation of seismic deformation demands using nonlinear procedures in multistory steel and concrete moment frames," ISET, Journal of Earthquake Technology (Special Issue on Performance Based Design), 41(1), 159-181.
23. Kunnath, S. K. and Chai, R. Y. H. [2004]. "Cumulative damage-based inelastic cyclic demand spectrum," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 33, 499-520.
24. Kunnath, S. K. Nghiem, Q., and El-Tawil, S. [2004]. "Modeling and response prediction in performance-based seismic evaluation: case studies of instrumented steel moment-frame buildings," Earthquake. Spectra, 20(3), 883-915.
25. Kuwamura, H. and Galambos, T. V. [1989]. "Earthquake load for structural reliability," Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 115, 1446-62.
26. Mavroeidis, G. P. Dong, G., and Papageorgiou, A. S. [2004]. "Near-fault ground motions, and the response of elastic and inelastic single-degree-freedom. (SDOF) systems," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 33, 1023-1049.
27. th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Wien, Balkema, pp. 1079-86.
28. OpenSees [2006]. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation, (available online), URL: http://opensees.berkeley.edu.
29. Ramirez, O. M., Constantinou, M. C. Whittaker, A. S. Kircher, C. A., and Crysostomou C. Z. [2002]. "Elastic and inelastic seismic response of buildings with damping systems," Earthquake Spectra, 18(3), 531-547.
30. Riddell, R. and Garcia, E. J. [2001]. "Hysteretic energy spectrum, and damage control," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 30, 1791-1816.
31. Ruiz-Garcia, J. and Miranda, E. [2003]. "Inelastic displacement ratios for evaluation of existing structures," Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 32, 1237-1258.
32. Spacone, E., Ciampi, V., and Filippou, F. C. [1992] "A beam element for seismic damage analysis," Report No. UCB/EERC-92/07, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
33. Sucuoglu, H., Yucemen, S., Gezer, A., and Erberik, A. [1998]. "Statistical evaluation of the damage potential of earthquake ground motions," Structural Safety, 20, 357-378.
34. Sucuoglu, H. and Erberik, A. [2004]. "Energy-based hysteresis and damage models for deteriorating systems," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 33, 69-88.
35. Teran-Gilmore, A. 1998. "A parametric approach to performance-based numerical seismic design," Earthquake Spectra, 14(3), 501-520.
36. Teran-Gilmore, A. and Jirsa, J. O. [2005]. "A damage model for practical seismic design that accounts for low cycle fatigue," Earthquake Spectra, 21(3), 803-832.
37. Trifunac, M. D. and Brady, A. G. [1975]. "On the correlation of seismic intensity scales with the peaks of recorded ground motion," Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 65,139-62.
38. Uang, C. M. and Bertero, V. V. [1990]. "Evaluation of seismic energy in structures," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 19, 77-90.