Evaluation of modal pushover analysis using generic frames

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 417-442

  Chintanapakdee, Chatpan ^a   Chopra, Anil K ^a  

^a Berkeley   (United States)

Author keywords

Building design; Building evaluation; Non linear static procedure; Pushover analysis; Seismic demands

Indexed keywords

BUILDINGS; EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

GENERIC FRAMES;

EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS;

BUILDING; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; GROUND MOTION; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 0037337510     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.232     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Building Seismic Safety Council. NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA-273 and Commentary FEMA-274. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 1997.
2. Fajfar P, Fischinger M. N2-a method for nonlinear seismic analysis of regular structures. Proceedings of the 9th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan, 1988; 5:111-116.
3. Bracci JM, Kunnath SK, Reinhorn AM. Seismic performance and retrofit evaluation for reinforced concrete structures. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1997; 123(1):3-10.
4. Gupta B, Kunnath SK. Adaptive spectra-based pushover procedure for seismic evaluation of structures. Earthquake Spectra 2000; 16(2):367-392.
5. Paret TF, Sasaki KK, Eilbeck DH, Freeman SA. Approximate inelastic procedures to identify failure mechanisms from higher mode effects. Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico, Paper No. 966, 1996.
6. Sasaki KK, Freeman SA, Parent TF. Multimode pushover procedure (MMP)-a method to identify the effects of higher modes in a pushover analysis. Proceedings of the 6th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Seattle, Washington, 1998.
7. Kunnath SK, Gupta B. Validity of deformation demand estimates using nonlinear static procedures. Proceedings of U.S.-Japan Workshop on Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Methodology for Reinforced Concrete Building Structures, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan, 2000; 117-128.
8. Matsumori T, Otani S, Shiohara H, Kabeyasawa T. Earthquake member deformation demands in reinforced concrete frame structures. Proceedings of U.S.-Japan Workshop on Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Methodology for Reinforced Concrete Building Structures, Maui, Hawaii, 2000; 79-94.
9. Chopra AK, Goel RK. A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimating seismic demands for buildings: theory and preliminary evaluation. PEER Report 2001103, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
10. Chopra AK, Goel RK. A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31:561-582.
11. Goel RK, Chopra AK. Evaluation of modal pushover analysis using SAC buildings. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE), submitted.
12. Yu QS, Chopra AK, Heintz J, Poland C. Evaluation of modal pushover analysis using a thirteen-storey building, Earthquake Spectra, in preparation.
13. International Code Council. 2000 International Building Code. Falls Church: Virginia, 2000.
14. Goel RK, Chopra AK. Period formulas for moment-resisting frame buildings. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1997; 123(11):1454-1461.
15. Chintanapakdee C, Chopra AK. Evaluation of modal pushover analysis for generic frames. Pacific Earthquake Engineering, Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 2002, to be published.
16. Chopra AK. Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering (2nd edn). Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2001; 844pp.
17. Benjamin JR, Correll CA. Probability, Statistics, and Decision for Civil Engineers. McGraw-Hill: New York, 1970; 684pp.
18. Newmark NM, Hall WJ. Earthquake Spectra and Design. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute: Berkeley, CA, 1982; 103pp.
19. Krawinkler H, Nassar AA. Seismic design based on ductility and cumulative damage demands and capacities. In Nonlinear Seismic Analysis and Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings, Fajfar P, Krawinkler H (eds). Elsevier Applied Science: New York, 1992.
20. Vidic T, Fajfar P, Fischinger M. Consistent inelastic design spectra: strength and displacement. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1994; 23(5):507-521.
21. Chopra AK, Goel RK. Capacity-demand-diagram methods based on inelastic design spectrum. Earthquake Spectra 1999; 15(4):637-656.