Statistical evaluation of the damage potential of earthquake ground motions

Structural Safety

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 357-378

  Sucuoǧlu, Haluk ^a   Yücemen, Semih ^a   Gezer, Alper ^a   Erberik, Altuǧ ^a  

^a MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Damage probability distribution; Damage spectra; Effective duration; Seismic damage potential; Seismic design; V A ratio

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; PROBABILITY; SEISMOLOGY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL METHODS; CODES (STANDARDS); PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS; SEISMIC DAMAGE POTENTIAL;

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE;

EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; GROUND MOTION; SEISMIC DESIGN; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0032216475     PISSN: 01674730     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-4730(98)00018-6     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Uniform Building Code. International Conference of Building Officials. Whittier, CA, 1997.
2. Applied Technology Council. Tentative provisions for the development of seismic regulations for buildings. ATC 3-06, NSF Publication 78-8, June 1978.
3. Commission of the European Code for Seismic Resistant Design, ENV. Brussels, November 1994.
4. Turkish Ministry of Reconstruction and Settlement. Specifications for buildings constructed in disaster areas. Ankara, September 1997.
5. Applied Technology Council. Structural response modification factors. ATC-19, Redwood City, CA, 1995.
6. Stephens JE. A damage function using structural response measurements. In: Proceedings on the Symposium on structural safety studies. ASCE, 1985:22-39.
7. Stephens JE, Yao JTP. Damage assessment using response measurements. J. Struct. Eng. ASCE 1985;111:722-39.
8. Powell GH, Allahabadi R. Seismic damage prediction by deterministic methods: concepts and procedures. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 1988;16:719-34.
9. Williams MS, Sexsmith RG. Seismic damage indices for concrete structures: a state-of-the-art review. Earthquake Spectra 1995;11:319-49.
10. Zahrah TF, Hall WJ. Seismic energy absorption in simple structures. Structural Research Series No. 501, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, 1982.
11. McCabe SL, Hall WJ. Assessment of seismic structural damage. J. of Struct. Eng. ASCE 1989;115:2166-83.
12. Park R. Explicit incorporation of element and structure overstrength in the design process. Proc. 11th World Conference Earthquake Eng. Paper no 2130, Acapulco, 1996.
13. Osteraas JD, Krawinkler H. Strength and ductility considerations in seismic design. Report 90, John A. Blume Earthquake Eng. Center, Stanford University, CA, 1990.
14. Uang CM, Bertero VV. Earthquake simulation tests and associated studies of a 0.3-scale model of a six-story concentrically braced steel structure. Report No. UCB/EERC-86-10, Earthquake Eng. Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 1986.
15. Bertero VV, Aktan AE, Charney FA, Sause R. Earthquake simulation tests and associated studies of a 1/5 th scale model of a 7-story R/C frame-wall test structure. Report No.UCB/EERC-84/05, Earthquake Eng. Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 1984.
16. Assaf AF. Evaluation of structural overstrength in steel building systems. M.Sc. thesis, Northeastern University, Boston, 1989.
17. IAEE. Earthquake Resistant Regulations, A World List. International Association for Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo, 1992.
18. Miranda E, Bertero VV. Evaluation of strength reduction factors for earthquake-resistant design. Earthquake spectra 1994;10:357-79.
19. Sucuoǧlu H, Nurtuǧ A. Earthquake ground motion characteristics and seismic energy dissipation. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 1995;24:1195-213.
20. Applied Technology Council. Enhancing the transfer of U.S. Geological Survey research results into engineering practice, Ch. 5. ATC-35, Redwood City, CA, 1994.
21. SAC. Characterization of ground motions during the Northridge earthquake of January 17, 1994. SAC-95-03, Sacramento, CA, 1995.
22. Somerville PG, Smith NF, Abrahamson NA. Accounting for near-fault rupture directivity effects in the development of design ground motions. Proceedings of the 11th World Conference Earthquake Eng., Paper no. 711, Acapulco, 1996.
23. Trifunac MD, Brady AG. A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 1975;65:581-626.
24. Ang AHS, Tang WH. Probability concepts in engineering planning and design, Basic principles, vol. 1. Canada: Wiley, 1975.
25. Miller I, Freund JE. Probability and statistics for engineers. 3rd ed. USA: Prentice-Hall, 1985.
26. Hwang HHM, Jaw JW. Probabilistic damage analysis of structures. J. Struct. Eng. ASCE 1990;116(7):1992-2007.