A procedure for evaluating seismic energy demand of framed structures

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 229-244

  Chou, Chung Che ^a   Uang, Chia Ming ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Absorbed energy; Ductility; Energy shape; Equivalent single degree of freedom (SDOF) system; Multistorey frame; Pushover analysis

Indexed keywords

BUILDINGS; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); FLOORS; STRUCTURAL FRAMES;

SEISMIC ENERGY;

SEISMOLOGY;

DAMAGE; DUCTILITY; ENERGY DISSIPATION; GROUND MOTION; MULTISTOREY BUILDING; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 0037322717     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.221     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. McCabe SL, Hall WJ. Damage and reserve capacity evaluation of structures subjected to strong earthquake ground motion. Proceedings of the 10th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Madrid, Spain, 1992, 3653-3658.
2. Akiyama H. Earthquake-resistant Limit-state Design for Buildings. University of Tokyo Press: Japan, 1985.
3. Leelataviwat S, Goel SC, Stojadinovic B. Toward performance-based seismic design of structures. Earthquake Spectra 1999; 15(3):435-461.
4. Chou C-C, Uang C-M. Establishing absorbed energy spectra-an attenuation approach. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2000; 29(10):1441-1455.
5. Lawson RS, Vance V, Krawinkler H. Nonlinear static push-over analysis-why, when, and how? Proceedings of the 5th U. S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, vol. 1. 1994; 283-292.
6. Fajfar P, Gašperšič P. The N2 method for the seismic damage analysis of RC buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1996; 25:31-46.
7. Seneviratna GDPK, Krawinkler H. Evaluation of inelastic MDOF effects for seismic design. Report No. 120, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1997.
8. Shen J, Akbas B. Seismic energy demand in steel moment frames. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 1999; 3(4):519-559.
9. Chopra AK, Goel RK. A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for buildings: theory and preliminary evaluation. Report No. 2001/03, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 2001.
10. Somerville P. Development of ground motion time histories for phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC steel project. Report No. SAC/BD-97/04, SAC Joint Venture, Sacramento, CA, 1997.
11. Uang C-M, Bertero VV. Evaluation of seismic energy in structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1990; 19(1):77-90.
12. Chou C-C. An energy-based seismic evaluation procedure for moment-resisting frames. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Structural Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 2001.
13. BSSC, NEHRP Recommended Provisions for the Development of Seismic Regulations for New Buildings, FEMA-222A, Washington, DC, 1994.
14. Krawinkler H, Gupta A. Storey drift demands for steel moment frame structures in different seismic regions. Proceedings of the 6th U. S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Oakland, CA, 1998.
15. ICBO, Uniform Building Code (UBC). International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, CA, 1994.
16. Prakash V, Powell GH, Filippou FC. DRAIN-2DX. User Guide, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 1993.
17. Chopra AK. Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering. Prentice-Hall: New Jersey, 1995.