Modeling and response prediction in performance-based seismic evaluation: Case studies of instrumented steel moment-frame buildings

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 883-915

  Kunnath, Sashi K ^a   Nghiem, Quan ^b   El Tawil, Sherif ^c  

^a University of California   (United States)

^b HNTB CORPORATION   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUILDINGS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS; EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STEEL CONSTRUCTION; STIFFNESS; STRUCTURAL FRAMES;

GROUND MOTION; SEISMIC EVALUATION; STEEL MOMENT FRAME BUILDINGS;

SEISMOLOGY;

ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK; MULTISTOREY BUILDING; NUMERICAL MODEL; PREDICTION; RESPONSE ANALYSIS; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STEEL STRUCTURE; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

CALIFORNIA; NORTHRIDGE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 5744224845     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.1774181     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2000. Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, prepared for the SAC Joint Venture, published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA-356, Washington, D.C.
2. Anderson, J. C., and Bertero, V. V., 1997. Implications of the Landers and Big Bear Earthquakes on Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Report UCB/EERC-97/08, Berkeley, CA.
3. Computers and Structures, Inc., 2003. SAP2000 - Structural Analysis Program, Berkeley, CA.
4. Cornell, C. A., and Luco, N., 1999. The Effects of Connection Fractures on Steel Moment Resisting Frame Seismic Demands and Safety, prepared for the SAC Joint Venture, published by the Structural Engineers Association of California, SAC/BD-99/03, Sacramento, CA.
5. Darragh, R., Cao, T., Graizer, V., Shakal, A., and Huang, M., 1994. Los Angeles Code-Instrumented Building Records from the Northridge, California Earthquake of 17 January, 1994: Processed Release 1 and 2, California Department of Conservation, Sacramento, CA.
6. Duan, X., and Anderson, J. C., 1999. Elastic Models for Predicting Building Performance, prepared for the SAC Joint Venture, published by the Structural Engineers Association of California, SAC/BD-99 /21, Sacramento, CA.
7. Foutch, D., 2000. State of the Art Report on Performance Prediction and Evaluation of Steel Moment Frames Buildings, prepared for the SAC Joint Venture, published by the Structural Engineers Association of California, Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA-355F, Washington, D.C.
8. Gupta, A., and Krawinkler, H., 1999. Prediction of Seismic Demands for SMRFS with Ductile Connections and Elements, prepared for the SAC Joint Venture, published by the Structural Engineers Association of California, SAC/BD-99/06, Sacramento, CA.
9. Hart, G. C., and Skokan, M. J., 1999. Reliability-Based Seismic Performance Evaluation of Steel Frame Buildings Using Nonlinear Static Analysis Methods, prepared for the SAC Joint Venture, published by the Structural Engineers Association of California, SAC/BD-99/22, Sacramento, CA.
10. Krawinkler, H., 2000. State of the Art Report on System Performance of Steel Moment Frames Subject to Earthquake Ground Shaking, prepared for the SAC Joint Venture, published by the Structural Engineers Association of California Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA-355C, Washington, D.C.
11. Krawinkler, H., and Mohasseb, S., 1987. Effect of panel zone deformations on seismic response, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 8, 233-250.
12. Kunnath, S. K., 1995. Enhancements to Program IDARC: Modeling Inelastic Behavior of Welded Connections in Steel Moment Resisting Frames, Technical Report NIST GCR 95-673, National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce, Gaithersburg, MD.
13. Lee, K., and Foutch, D. A., 2002. Seismic performance evaluation of pre-Northridge steel frame buildings with brittle connections, J. Struct. Eng., ASCE 128 (4), 546-555.
14. Liu, J., and Astaneh-Asl, A., 2000. Cyclic Tests on Simple Connections Including Effects of the Slab, prepared for the SAC Joint Venture, published by the Structural Engineers Association of California, SAC/BD-00/03, Sacramento, CA.
15. SAC Joint Venture, 1996. Experimental Investigations of Beam-Column Subassemblages, Parts 1 and 2, prepared for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, SAC 96-01, Washington, D.C.
16. Shakal, A., Huang, M., Darragh, R., Cao, T., Sherburne, R., Malhotra, P., Cramer, C., Sydnor, R., Graizer, V., Maldonado, G., Peterson, C., and Wampole, J., 1994. CSMIP Strong-Motion Records from the Northridge, California Earthquake of 17 January, 1994, California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, Sacramento, CA.
17. Shen, J.-H., and Astaneh, A., 1990. Seismic Response Evaluation of an Instrumented Six-Story Steel Building, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Report UCB/EERC-90/20, Berkeley, CA.
18. Shi, S., and Foutch, D. A., 1997. Connection Element (Type 10) for Drain-2-DX, Civil Engineering Report, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL.
19. Uang, C. M., Yu, Q. S., Sadre, A., Bonowitz, D., and Youssef, N., 1995. Performance of a 13-Story Steel Moment-Resisting Frame Damaged in the 1994 Northridge Earthquake, University of California, San Diego, Report SSRP-95/04.