Assessment of current nonlinear static procedures for seismic evaluation of buildings

Engineering Structures

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 305-316

  Kalkan, Erol ^a   Kunnath, Sashi K ^a  

^a University of California Davis   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive pushover; Near fault records; Nonlinear static analysis; Seismic evaluation

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EVALUATION; PROBABILITY; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMOLOGY; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; TECTONICS;

NONLINEAR STATIS PROCEDURES; NONLINEAR TIME-HISTORY ANALYSIS; PROBABILISTIC ASSESSMENT; REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDINGS; SEISMIC EVALUATION;

BUILDINGS;

BUILDINGS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EVALUATION; PROBABILITY; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMOLOGY; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; TECTONICS;

ASSESSMENT METHOD; BUILDING; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; GROUND MOTION; NONLINEARITY; PROBABILITY; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 33846299278     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.04.012     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. Design example and commentary for the calculation of response and limit strength 2001 [in Japanese]
2. CEN. Eurocode 8-Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, Part -1. European Standard prEN 1998-1. Draft no. 4. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization; December 2001
3. Applied Technology Council (ATC). Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. Volumes 1 and 2. Report no. ATC-40, Redwood City (CA), 1996
4. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA-356. Washington DC; 2000
5. Gupta B., and Kunnath S.K. Adaptive spectra-based pushover procedure for seismic evaluation of structures. Earthquake Spectra 16 2 (2000) 367-391
6. Kunnath S.K., and Kalkan E. Evaluation of seismic deformation demands using nonlinear procedures in multistory steel and concrete moment frames. ISET, Journal of Earthquake Technology 41 1 (2004) 159-182
7. Kalkan E., Kunnath S.K.. Method of modal combinations for pushover analysis of buildings. In: Proc. of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Paper no. 2713. 2004
8. Goel R.K., and Chopra A.K. Evaluation of modal and FEMA pushover analyses: SAC buildings. Earthquake Spectra 20 1 (2004) 225-254
9. Chopra A.K., and Goel R.K. A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 31 (2002) 561-582
10. Chopra A.K., Goel R.K., and Chintanapakdee C. Evaluation of a modified MPA procedure assuming higher modes as elastic to estimate seismic demands. Earthquake Spectra 20 3 (2004) 757-778
11. Jan T.S., Liu M.W., and Kao Y.C. An upper-bound pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands of high-rise buildings. Engineering Structures 26 (2004) 117-128
12. Elnashai A.S.. Advanced inelastic (pushover) analysis for seismic design and assessment. In: The G. Penelis Symposium. 2000
13. Antonio S., and Pinho R. Development and verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover procedure. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 8 5 (2004) 643-661
14. Kalkan E., Kunnath S.K.. Adaptive modal combination procedure for nonlinear static analysis of building structures. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 2006 [in press]
15. Kunnath S.K., Nghiem Q., and El-Tawil S. Modeling and response prediction in performance-based seismic evaluation: Case studies of instrumented steel moment-frame buildings. Earthquake Spectra 20 3 (2004) 883-915
16. OpenSees 2005. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation. Available online: http://opensees.berkeley.edu
17. Cheng F.Y. Matrix analysis of structural dynamics - applications and earthquake engineering (2001), Marcel Dekker p. 997
18. Kalkan E., and Kunnath S.K. Effects of fling-step and forward-rupture directivity on the seismic response of buildings. Earthquake Spectra 22 2 (2006) 367-390