The study of political campaigns

Capturing Campaign Effects

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-26

  Brady, Henry E ^a   Johnston, Richard ^b   Sides, John ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34147189553     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (92)

1. Allsop, Dee, and Herbert F. Weisberg. 1988. "Measuring Change in Party IdentiAcation in an Election Campaign." American Journal of Political Science 32:996-1017.
2. Alvarez, R. Michael. 1998. Information and Elections. Rev. ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
3. Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Shanto Iyengar. 1994. "Riding the Wave and Claiming Ownership over Issues: The Joint Effects of Advertising and News Coverage in Campaigns." Public Opinion Quarterly 58:335-57.
4. Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Shanto Iyengar. 1995. Going Negative: How Political Advertisements Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York: Free Press.
5. Ansolabehere, Stephen D., Shanto Iyengar, and Adam Simon. 1999. "Replicating Experiments Using Aggregate and Survey Data: The Case of Negative Advertising and Turnout." American Political Science Review 93:901-10.
6. Ansolabehere, Stephen, Shanto Iyengar, Adam Simon, and Nicholas Valentino. 1994. "Does Attack Advertising Demobilize the Electorate?" American Political Science Review 88:829-38.
7. Bartels, Larry M. 1987. "Candidate Choice and the Dynamics of the Presidential Nomination Process." American Journal of Political Science 31:1-30.
8. Bartels, Larry M. 1988. Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
9. Bartels, Larry M. 1993. "Messages Received: The Political Impact of Media Exposure." American Political Science Review 87:267-85.
10. Bartels, Larry M. 1996. Review of Going Negative: How Political Advertisements Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. Public Opinion Quarterly 60:456-61.
11. Bartels, Larry M. 1998. "Electoral Continuity and Change, 1868-96." Electoral Studies 17: 301-26.
12. Bartels, Larry M., and John Zaller. 2001. "Presidential Vote Models: A Recount." PS: Political Science and Politics 34:9-20.
13. Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Berelson, Bernard R., Paul F. Lazarsfeld, and William N. McPhee. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Bradshaw, Joel. 1995. "Who Will Vote for You and Why: Designing Strategy and Theme." In Campaigns and Elections American Style, ed. James A. Thurber and Candice J. Nelson. Boulder: Westview Press.
16. Brady, Henry E., and Richard Johnston. 1987. "What's the Primary Message: Horse Race or Issue Journalism?" In Media and Momentum: The New Hampshire Primary and Nomination Politics, ed. Gary R. Orren and Nelson W. Polsby. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
17. Caldeira, Gregory A., Samuel C. Patterson, and Gregory A. Markko. 1985. "The Mobilization of Voters in Congressional Elections." Journal of Politics 47:490-509.
18. Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
19. Campbell, James A., and James C. Garand, eds. 2000. Before the Vote: Forecasting American National Elections. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Campbell, James E. 2000. The American Campaign: U.S. Presidential Campaigns and the National Vote. College Station: Texas A&M Press.
21. Carsey, Thomas M. 2000. Campaign Dynamics: The Race for Governor. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
22. Clinton, Joshua D., and John S. Lapinski. 2004. "Targeted Advertising and Voter Turnout: An Experimental Study of the 2000 Presidential Election." Journal of Politics 66 (1): 69-96.
23. Conover, Pamela Johnston, and Stanley Feldman. 1989. "Candidate Perception in an Ambiguous World: Campaigns, Cues, and Inference Processes." American Journal of Political Science 33:912-40.
24. Dalager, Jon K. 1996. "Voters, Issues, and Elections: Are the Candidates' Messages Getting Through?" Journal of Politics 58:486-515.
25. Erbring, Lutz, and Edie N. Goldenberg. 1980. "Front-Page News and Real-World Cues: A New Look at Agenda-Setting by the Media." American Journal of Political Science 24:16-49.
26. Fair, Ray. 1978. "The Effect of Economic Events on the Vote for President." Review of Economics and Statistics 60:159-72.
27. Finkel, Steven E. 1993. "Reexamining the 'Minimal Effects' Model in Recent Presidential Campaigns." Journal of Politics 55:1-31.
28. Finkel, Steven E., and John Geer. 1998. "A Spot Check: Casting Doubt on the Demobilizing Effect of Attack Advertising." American Journal of Political Science 42: 573-95.
29. Franklin, Charles H. 1991. "Eschewing Obfuscation? Campaigns and the Perception of U.S. Senate Incumbents." American Political Science Review 85:1193-214.
30. Freedman, Paul, and Ken Goldstein. 1999. "Measuring Media Exposure and the Effects of Negative Campaign Ads." American Journal of Political Science 43:1189-208.
31. Gelman, Andrew, and Gary King. 1993. "Why Are American Presidential Election Polls So Variable When Votes Are So Predictable?" British Journal of Political Science 23:409-51.
32. Gerber, Alan S., and Donald P. Green. 2000a. "The Effects of Personal Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment." American Political Science Review 94:653-64.
33. Gerber, Alan S., and Donald P. Green. 2000b. "The Effect of a Non-Partisan Get-Out-The-Vote Drive: An Experimental Study of LeaBetting." Journal of Politics 62:846-57.
34. Goldstein, Ken, and Paul Freedman. 2000. "New Evidence for New Arguments: Money and Advertising in the 1996 Senate Elections." Journal of Politics 62:1087-108.
35. Hammond, Thomas H., and Brian D. Humes. 1993. "The Spatial Model and Elections." In Information, Participation, and Choice, ed. Bernard Grofman. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
36. Hetherington, Marc J. 1996. "The Media's Role in Forming Voters' National Economic Evaluations in 1992." American Journal of Political Science 40:372-95.
37. Hibbs, Douglas A., Jr. 2000. "Bread and Peace Voting in U.S. Presidential Elections." Public Choice 104:149-80.
38. Hillygus, D. Sunshine, and Simon Jackman. 2003. "Voter Decision Making in Election 2000: Campaign Effects, Partisan Activation, and the Clinton Legacy." American Journal of Political Science 47 (4): 583-96.
39. Holbrook, Thomas M. 1996. Do Campaigns Matter? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40. Holbrook, Thomas M. 1999. "Political Learning from Presidential Debates." Political Behavior 21:67-89.
41. Iyengar, Shanto, and Donald Kinder. 1987. News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42. Jacobson, Gary C. 1983. The Politics of Congressional Elections. Boston: Little, Brown.
43. Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 2000. Everything You Think You Know about Politics . . . And Why You're Wrong. New York: Basic Books.
44. Johnston, Richard. 1992. "Party IdentiAcation and Campaign Dynamics." Political Behavior 14:311-31.
45. Johnston, Richard, André Blais, Henry E. Brady, and Jean Crête. 1992. Letting the People Decide: Dynamics of a Canadian Election. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.
46. Johnston, Richard, and Henry Brady. 2002. "The Rolling Cross-Section Design." Electoral Studies, 21:283-95.
47. Johnston, Richard, Michael G. Hagen, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. 2004. The 2000 Presidential Election and the Foundations of Party Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. Kahn, Kim Fridkin, and Patrick J. Kenney. 1999a. The Spectacle of U.S. Senate Campaigns. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
49. Kahn, Kim Fridkin, and Patrick J. Kenney. 1999b. "Do Negative Campaigns Mobilize or Suppress Turnout? Clarifying the Relationship between Negativity and Participation." American Political Science Review 93:877-90.
50. Krosnick, Jon A., and Laura R. Brannon. 1993. "The Impact of the Gulf War on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations: Multidimensional Effects of Political Involvement." American Political Science Review 87:963-75.
51. Krosnick, Jon A., and Donald R. Kinder. 1990. "Altering the Foundations of Support for the President through Priming." American Political Science Review 84:497-512.
52. Lau, Richard R., and Gerald M. Pomper. 2002. "Effectiveness of Negative Campaigning in U.S. Senate Elections." American Journal of Political Science 46:47-66.
53. Lau, Richard R., Lee Sigelman, Caroline Heldman, and Paul Babbitt. 1999. "The Effectiveness of Negative Political Advertising: A Meta-Analysis." American Political Science Review 93:851-75.
54. Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Bernard Berelson, and Hazel Gaudet. 1948. The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.
55. Lewis-Beck, Michael. 1992. Forecasting Elections. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
56. Lodge, Milton, Kathleen M. McGraw, and Patrick Stroh. 1989. "An Impression- Driven Model of Candidate Evaluation." American Political Science Review 83:399-419.
57. Lodge, Milton, Marco R. Steenbergen, and Shawn Brau. 1995. "The Responsive Voter: Campaign Information and the Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation." American Political Science Review 89:309-26.
58. MacKuen, Michael B., and Steven L. Coombs. 1981. More than News: Media Power in Public Affairs. Beverly Hills: Sage.
59. Marcus, George E., and Michael B. MacKuen. 1993. "Anxiety, Enthusiasm, and the Vote: The Emotional Underpinnings of Learning and Involvement during Presidential Campaigns." American Political Science Review 87:672-85.
60. Marcus, George E., W. Russell Neuman, and Michael B. MacKuen. 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
61. Markus, Gregory B. 1982. "Political Attitudes during an Election Year: A Report on the 1980 NES Panel Study." American Political Science Review 76:538-60.
62. McCombs, Maxwell E., and Donald L. Shaw. 1972. "The Agenda-Setting Function of the Mass Media." Public Opinion Quarterly 36:176-87.
63. McGuire, William J. 1968. "Personality and Susceptibility to Social InBuence." In Handbook of Personality Theory and Research, ed. E. F. Borgatta and W. W. Lambert. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
64. McGuire, William J. 1969. "The Nature of Attitudes and Attitude Change." In Handbook of Social Psychology, ed. G. Lindzey and E. Aronson, 2d ed. Reading, MA: Addison- Wesley.
65. Mendelberg, Tali. 1997. "Executing Hortons: Racial Crime in the 1988 Presidential Campaign." Public Opinion Quarterly 61:134-57.
66. Mendelberg, Tali. 2001. The Race Card: Campaign Strategy, Implicit Messages, and the Norm of Equality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
67. Mendelsohn, Matthew. 1996. "The Media and Interpersonal Communications: The Priming of Issues, Leaders, and Party IdentiAcation." Journal of Politics 58 (1): 112-25.
68. Norris, Pippa, John Curtice, David Sanders, Margaret Scammell, and Holli A. Semetko. 1999. On Message: Communicating the Campaign. London: Sage.
69. Page, Benjamin I. 1976. "The Theory of Political Ambiguity." American Political Science Review 70:742-52.
70. Page, Benjamin I. 1978. Choice and Echoes in Presidential Elections. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
71. Patterson, Samuel C., and Gregory A. Caldeira. 1983. "Getting out the Vote: Participation in Gubernatorial Elections." American Political Science Review 77:675-89.
72. Patterson, Thomas E. 1980. The Mass Media Election: How Americans Choose Their President. New York: Praeger.
73. Patterson, Thomas E. 1994. Out of Order. New York: Vintage.
74. Petrocik, John R. 1996. "Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study." American Journal of Political Science 40:825-50.
75. Popkin, Samuel L. 1991. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
76. Riker, William. 1983. "Political Theory: The Art of Heresthetics." In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, ed. Ada Finifter. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
77. Rosenstone, Steven. 1983. Forecasting Presidential Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
78. Rosenstone, Steven, and John Mark Hansen. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy. New York: MacMillan.
79. Shaw, Daron R. 1999a. "A Study of Presidential Campaign Event Effects from 1952 to 1992." Journal of Politics 61:387-422.
80. Shaw, Daron R. 1999b. "The Effect of TV Ads and Candidate Appearances on Statewide Presidential Votes, 1988-96." American Political Science Review 93:345-61.
81. Shaw, Daron R. 1999c. "The Methods behind the Madness: Presidential Electoral College Strategies, 1988-1996." Journal of Politics 61:893-913.
82. Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1972. "The Strategy of Ambiguity: Uncertainty and Electoral Competition." American Political Science Review 66:555-69.
83. Simon, Adam F. 2002. The Winning Message: Candidate Behavior, Campaign Discourse, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
84. Stoker, Laura, and Jacob Bowers. 2002. "Designing Multi-level Studies: Sampling Voters and Electoral Contexts." Electoral Studies 21:235-67.
85. Valentino, Nicholas A., Vincent L. Hutchings, and Ismail K. White. 2002. "Cues that Matter: How Political Ads Prime Racial Attitudes during Campaigns." American Political Science Review 96:75-90.
86. Wattenberg, Martin P., and Craig Leonard Brians. 1999. "Negative Campaign Advertising: Demobilizer or Mobilizer?" American Political Science Review 93:891-900.
87. Westlye, Mark Christopher. 1983. "Competitiveness of Senate Seats and Voting Behavior in Senate Elections." American Journal of Political Science 27:253-83.
88. Westlye, Mark Christopher. 1991. Senate Elections and Campaign Intensity. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
89. Wlezien, Christopher, and Robert S. Erikson. 2002. "The Timeline of Presidential Election Campaigns." Journal of Politics 64 (4): 969-93.
90. Zaller, John R. 1989. "Bringing Converse Back In: Modeling Information Flow in Political Campaigns." Political Analysis 1:181-234.
91. Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
92. Zaller, John R. 1996. "The Myth of Massive Media Impact Revived: New Support for a Discredited Idea." In Political Persuasion and Attitude Change, ed. Diana C. Mutz, Paul M. Sniderman, and Richard A. Brody. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.