Effectiveness of negative campaigning in U.S. Senate elections

American Journal of Political Science

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 47-66

  Lau, Richard R ^a   Pomper, Gerald M ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036006526     PISSN: 00925853     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3088414     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Explaining senate election outcomes
2. Does attack advertising demobilize the electorate?
3. Instrumental and 'quasi-instrumental' variables
4. Messages received: The political impact of media exposure
5. Campaign reform: Insights and evidence
6. Presidential coattails in Senate elections
7. State and national factors in gubernatorial and senatorial elections
8. Pols accentuated negative
9. Mudslinging is big voter turnoff
10. A spot check: Casting doubt on the demobilizing effect of attack advertising
11. Eschewing obfuscation? Campaigns and the perception of U.S. Senate incumbents
12. Candidate influence over the voter's decision calculus
13. Campaigns, competition, and political advertising
14. Estimating the effect of campaign spending on Senate election outcomes using instrumental variables
15. Political commercials in the 1996 election
16. Salvation for the spendthrift incumbent: Reestimating the effects of campaign spending in house elections
17. Attack politics in presidential nomination campaigns: An examination of the frequency and determinants of intermediated negative messages against opponents
18. The effects of campaign spending in congressional elections
19. Eliminate the negative? Defining and refining categories of analysis for political advertisements
20. Negative versus positive television advertising in U.S. presidential campaigns, 1960-1988
21. Presidential ads as nightly news: A content analysis of 1988 and 1992 televised adwatches
22. Negativity in evaluation
23. Negativity in political perception
24. Two explanations for negativity effects in political behavior
25. Effects of negative campaigning on turnout in U.S. Senate elections, 1988-1998
26. Negative campaigning by U.S. Senate candidates
27. Effects of negative campaigning on Senate election outcomes: 1988-1996
28. The effectiveness of negative political advertising: A meta-analytic assessment
29. In defense of negative campaigning
30. An empirical investigation of the dynamics of PAC contributions
31. The effects of TV ads and candidate appearances on statewide presidential votes, 1988-1996
32. Challenger quality and voting behavior in U.S. Senate elections
33. Measuring state partisanship and ideology with survey data