Stroke volume variation during hemorrhage and after fluid loading: Impact of different tidal volumes

Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Volumn 51, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 538-544

  Renner, J ^a   Cavus, E ^a   Meybohm, P ^a   Tonner, P ^a   Steinfath, M ^a   Scholz, J ^a   Lutter, G ^a   Bein, B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Fluid responsiveness; Hemorrhage; Monitoring; Preload; Stroke volume variation; Tidal volume; Ventilation

Indexed keywords

HETASTARCH;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BLEEDING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FLUID RESUSCITATION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC VOLUME; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HYPERVOLEMIA; HYPOVOLEMIA; MALE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SWINE; THERMODILUTION; TIDAL VOLUME;

ANIMALS; CARDIAC OUTPUT; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HEMORRHAGE; MALE; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; STROKE VOLUME; SWINE; THERMODILUTION; TIDAL VOLUME;

EID: 34147137796     PISSN: 00015172     EISSN: 13996576     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01282.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Calvin JE, Driedger AA, Sibbald WJ. The hemodynamic effect of rapid fTluid infusion in critically ill patients. Surgery 1981; 90: 61-76.
2. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D et al. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162: 134-8.
3. Squara P, Journois D, Estagnasie P et al. Elastic energy as an index of right ventricular filling. Chest 1997; 111: 351-8.
4. Tavernier B, Makhotine O, Lebuffe G et al. Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsisinduced hypotension. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 1313-21.
5. Berkenstadt H, Friedman Z, Preisman S et al. Pulse pressure and stroke Volume variations during severe haemorrhage in ventilated dogs. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94: 721-6.
6. Hofer CK, Muller SM, Furrer L et al. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Chest 2005; 128: 848-54.
7. Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Schmidt C et al. Stroke volume variations for assessment of cardiac responsiveness to volume loading in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28: 392-8.
8. Berkenstadt H, Margalit N, Hadani M et al. Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing brain surgery. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 984-9.
9. Preisman S, Kogan S, Berkenstadt H, Perel A. Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: functional haemodynamic parameters including the Respiratory Systolic Variation Test and static preload indicators. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95: 746-55.
10. Szold A, Pizov R, Segal E, Perel A. The effect of tidal volume and intravascular volume state on systolic pressure variation in ventilated dogs. Intensive Care Med 1989; 15: 368-71.
11. De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M et al. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 517-23.
12. Godje O, Hoke K, Goetz AE et al. Reliability of a new algorithm for continuous cardiac output determination by pulse-contour analysis during hemodynamic instability. Crit Care Med 2002; 30: 52-8.
13. Wesseling KH, Jansen JR, Settels JJ, Schreuder JJ. Computation of aortic flow from pressure in humans using a nonlinear, three-element model. J Appl Physiol 1993; 74: 2566-73.
14. Sakka SG, Ruhl CC, Pfeiffer UJ et al. Assessment of cardiac preload and extravascular lung water by single transpulmonary thermodilution. Intensive Care Med 2000; 26: 180-7.
15. Wiesenack C, Prasser C, Rodig G, Keyl C. Stroke volume variation as an indicator of fluid responsiveness using pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth Analg 2003; 96: 1254-7.
16. Michard F, Teboul JL, Richard C. Influence of tidal volume on stroke volume variation. Does it really matter? Intensive Care Med 2003; 29: 1613.
17. Reuter DA, Bayerlein J, Goepfert MS et al. Influence of tidal volume on left ventricular stroke volume variation measured by pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29: 476-80.
18. Matejovic M, Krouzecky A, Rokyta R Jr, Novak I. Fluid challenge in patients at risk for fluid loading-induced pulmonary edema. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004; 48: 69-73.
19. Reuter DA, Goepfert MS, Goresch T et al. Assessing fluid responsiveness during open chest conditions. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94: 318-23.
20. Reuter DA, Kirchner A, Felbinger TWet al. Usefulness of left ventricular stroke volume variation to assess fluid responsiveness in patients with reduced cardiac function. Crit Care Med 2003; 31: 1399-404.
21. Perner A, Faber T. Stroke volume variation does not predict fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock on pressure support ventilation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2006; 50: 1068-73.
22. Fujita Y, Yamamoto T, Sano I et al. A comparison of changes in cardiac preload variables during graded hypovolemia and hypervolemia in mechanically ventilated dogs. Anesth Analg 2004; 99: 1780-6, table of contents.
23. Bajorat J, Hofmockel R, Vagts DA et al. Comparison of invasive and less-invasive techniques of cardiac output measurement under different haemodynamic conditions in a pig model. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2006; 23: 23-30.
24. Ostergaard M, Nielsen J, Rasmussen JP, Berthelsen PG. Cardiac output - pulse contour analysis vs. pulmonary artery thermodilution. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2006; 50: 1044-9.