Stroke volume variation as an indicator of fluid responsiveness using pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 96, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 1254-1257

  Wiesenack, Christoph ^a   Prasser, Christopher ^a   Rödig, Gabriele ^a   Keyl, Cornelius ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ETOMIDATE; FENTANYL; HETASTARCH; ISOFLURANE; PANCURONIUM;

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ANALYTIC METHOD; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTERY CATHETER; ARTICLE; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CRITICAL ILLNESS; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HEART PERFORMANCE; HEART PRELOAD; HEART RATE; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HUMAN; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; LUNG CAPILLARY PRESSURE; MALE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE CONTOUR ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL PATIENT; SYSTEMIC VASCULAR RESISTANCE; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0037407062     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000053237.29264.01     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Buhre W, Buhre K, Kazmaier S, et al. Assessment of cardiac preload by indicator dilution and transoesophageal echocardiography. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2001;18:662-7.
2. Sakka SG, Bredle DL, Reinhart K, Meier-Hellmann A. Comparison between intrathoracic blood volume and cardiac filling pressures in the early phase of hemodynamic instability of patients with sepsis or septic shock. J Crit Care 1999;14:78-83.
3. Beaussier M, Coriat P, Perel A, et al. Determinants of systolic pressure variation in patients ventilated after vascular surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1995;9:547-51.
4. Rooke GA, Schwid HA, Shapira Y. The effect of graded hemorrhage and intravascular volume replacement on systolic pressure variation in humans during mechanical and spontaneous ventilation. Anesth Analg 1995;80:925-32.
5. Tavernier B, Makhotine O, Lebuffe G, et al. Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsisinduced hypotension. Anesthesiology 1998;89:1313-21.
6. Gunn SR, Pinsky MR. Implications of arterial pressure variation in patients in the intensive care unit. Curr Opin Crit Care 2001;7:212-7.
7. Michard F, Teboul JK. Using heart-lung interactions to assess fluid responsiveness during mechanical ventilation. Crit Care 2000;4:282-9.
8. Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients. Chest 2002;121:2000-8.
9. Perel A. Assessing fluid responsiveness by the systolic pressure variation in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesthesiology 1998;89:1309-10.
10. Szold A, Pizov R, Segal E, Perel A. The effect of tidal volume and intravascular volume state on systolic pressure variation in ventilated dogs. Intensive Care Med 1989;15:368-71.
11. Berkenstadt H, Margalit N, Hadani M, et al. Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing brain surgery. Anesth Analg 2001;92:984-9.
12. Feissel M, Michard F, Mangin I, et al. Respiratory changes in aortic blood velocity as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients with septic shock. Chest 2001;119:867-73.
13. Pinsky RP. Functional hemodynamic monitoring. Intensive Care Med 2002;28:386-8.
14. Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Kilger E, et al. Optimizing fluid therapy in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery by on-line monitoring of left ventricular stroke volume variations: comparison with aortic systolic pressure variations. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:124-6.
15. Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Schmidt C, et al. Stroke volume variations for assessment of cardiac responsiveness to volume loading in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med 2002;28:392-8.
16. Goedje O, Hoeke K, Lichtwarck-Aschoff M, et al. Continuous cardiac output by femoral arterial thermodilution calibrated pulse contour analysis: comparison with pulmonary artery thermodilution. Crit Care Med 1999;27:2407-12.
17. Michard F, Chemla D, Richard C, et al. Clinical use of respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure to monitor the hemodynamic effects of PEEP. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;159: 935-9.
18. Perel A. Analog values from invasive hemodynamic monitoring. In: Vincent JL, ed. Updates in intensive care and emergency medicine, applied cardiovascular physiology. Berlin: Springer, 1997:129-40.
19. Denault AY, Gasior TA, Gorscan J 3rd, et al. Determinants of aortic pressure variation during positive pressure ventilation in man. Chest 1999;68:1532-6.