Stroke volume variation does not predict fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock on pressure support ventilation

Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Volumn 50, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1068-1073

  Perner, A ^a   Faber, T ^b  

^a International Center for Research and Research Training in Endocrine Disruption of Male Reproduction and Child Health   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Blood volume; Cardiac output; Plasma volume expanders; Septic shock; Stroke volume

Indexed keywords

DOBUTAMINE; FENTANYL; NORADRENALIN; PROPOFOL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD VOLUME; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT; FEMALE; HEART INDEX; HEART OUTPUT; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; MALE; MONITOR; PATIENT MONITORING; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PREDICTION; PRESSURE SUPPORT VENTILATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE CONTOUR CARDIAC OUTPUT SYSTEM; SEPSIS; SEPTIC SHOCK; THERMODILUTION; TRANSPULMONARY THERMODILUTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VENTILATOR;

AGED; BLOOD PRESSURE; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CATHETERIZATION, SWAN-GANZ; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; ROC CURVE; SHOCK, SEPTIC; STROKE VOLUME; THERMODILUTION;

EID: 33748934573     PISSN: 00015172     EISSN: 13996576     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01120.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bendjelid K, Romand JA. Fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a review of indices used in intensive care. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29: 352-60.
2. Pinsky MR. Assessment of indices of preload and volume responsiveness. Curr Opin Crit Care 2005; 11: 235-9.
3. Marx G, Cope T, McCrossan L, Swaraj S, Cowan C, Mostafa SM et al. Assessing fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2004; 21: 132-8.
4. Berkenstadt H, Margalit N, Hadani M, Friedman Z, Segal E, Villa Y et al. Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing brain surgery. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 984-9.
5. Wiesenack C, Prasser C, Rodig G, Keyl C. Stroke volume variation as an indicator of fluid responsiveness using pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth Analg 2003; 96: 1254-7.
6. Hofer CK, Müller SM, Furrer L, Klaghofer R, Genoni M, Zollinger A. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Chest 2005; 128: 848-54.
7. Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Kilger E, Schmidt C, Lamm P, Goetz AE. Optimizing fluid therapy in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery by on-line monitoring of left ventricular stroke volume variations. Comparison with aortic systolic pressure variations. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 124-6.
8. Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Schmidt C, Kilger E, Goedje O, Lamm P et al. Stroke volume variations for assessment of cardiac responsiveness to volume loading in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28: 392-8.
9. Wiesenack C, Fiegl C, Keyser A, Prasser C, Keyl C. Assessment of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated cardiac surgical patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2005; 22: 658-65.
10. Preisman S, Kogan S, Berkenstadt H, Perel A. Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: functional haemodynamic parameters including the Respiratory Systolic Variation Test and static preload indicators. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95: 746-55.
11. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Med 1992; 20: 864-74.
12. Devlin JW, Boleski G, Mlynarek M, Nerenz DR, Peterson E, Jankowski M et al. Motor Activity Assessment Scale: a valid and reliable sedation scale for use with mechanically ventilated patients in an adult surgical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 1271-5.
13. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De MA, Bruining H et al. The SOFA (sepsis-related organ failure assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on sepsis-related problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 1996; 22: 707-10.
14. Michard F, Alaya S, Zarka V, Bahloul M, Richard C, Teboul JL. Global end-diastolic volume as an indicator of cardiac preload in patients with septic shock. Chest 2003; 124: 1900-8.
15. Nouira S, Elatrous S, Dimassi S, Besbes L, Boukef R, Mohamed B et al. Effects of norepinephrine on static and dynamic preload indicators in experimental hemorrhagic shock. Crit Care Med 2005; 33: 2339-43.
16. Pinsky MR. The dynamic interface between hemodynamic variables and autonomic tone. Crit Care Med 2005; 33: 2437-8.
17. Tavernier B, Makhotine O, Lebuffe G, Dupont J, Scherpereel P. Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 1313-21.
18. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, Anguel N, Mercat A, Lecarpentier Y et al. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162: 134-8.
19. De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, Koch M, Vincent JL. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal Volume. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 517-23.