Relationships among relational communication processes and consultation outcomes for students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

School Psychology Review

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 111-129

  Erchul, William P ^a   DuPaul, George J ^b   Grissom, Priscilla F ^c,e   Vile Junod, Rosemary E ^b   Jitendra, Asha K ^b   Mannella, Mark C ^b   Tresco, Katy E ^b   Flammer Rivera, Lizette M ^b   Volpe, Robert J ^d  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LEHIGH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e North Carolina State University ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34147108639     PISSN: 02796015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (73)

1. Allinder, R. M., & Oats, R. G. (1997). Effects of acceptability on teachers' implementation of curriculum-based measurement and student achievement in mathematics computation. Remedial & Special Education, 18(2), 113-120.
2. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
3. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision). Washington, DC: Author.
4. Ayers, J., & Miura, S. Y. (1981). Construct and predictive validity of instruments for coding relational control. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 45, 159-171.
5. Barkley, R. A. (2006). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A handbook for diagnosis and treatment (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.
6. Barkley, R. A., DuPaul, G. J., & McMurray, M. B. (1990). A comprehensive evaluation of attention deficit disorder with and without hyperactivity as defined by research criteria. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 775-789.
7. Barkley, R. A., Fischer, M., Edelbrock, C. S., & Smallish, L. (1990). The adolescent outcome of hyperactive children diagnosed by research criteria: I. An 8 year prospective follow-up study. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 29, 546-557.
8. Barone, S. G. (1995). The egalitarian virus. Education Weekly, March 1, p. 35.
9. Bateson, G. (1935). Culture contact and schismogenesis. Man, 35, 178-183.
10. Bateson, G. (1958). Naven (2nd ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11. Bergan, J. R. (1977). Behavioral consultation. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
12. Bergan, J. R.,& Kratochwill, T. R. (1990). Behavioral consultation and therapy. New York: Plenum.
13. Bergan, J. R., & Tombari, M. L. (1975). The analysis of verbal interactions occurring during consultation. Journal of School Psychology, 13, 209-226.
14. Bergan, J. R., & Tombari, M. L. (1976). Consultant skill and efficiency and the implementation and outcomes of consultation. Journal of School Psychology, 14, 3-14.
15. Bossard, M. D., & Gutkin, T. B. (1983). The relationship of consultant skill and school organizational characteristics with teacher use of school-based consultation services. School Psychology Review, 12, 50-56.
16. Browder, D., et al. (1989). An in vivo evaluation of the use of data-based rules to guide instructional decisions. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14, 234-240.
17. Busse, R. T., Kratochwill, T. R., & Elliott, S. N. (1995). Meta-analysis for single-case outcomes: Applications to research and practice. Journal of School Psychology, 33, 269-285.
18. Cardillo, J. E., & Smith, A. (1994). Reliability of goal attainment scores. In T. J. Kiresuk, A. Smith, & J. E. Cardillo (Eds.), Goal attainment scaling: Applications, theory and measurement (pp. 213- 242). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Courtright, J. A., Millar, F. E., & Rogers-Millar, L. E. (1979). Domineeringness and dominance: Replication and expansion. Communication Monographs, 46, 179-192.
20. Daly, E. J., Witt, J. C., Martens, B. K., & Dool, E. J. (1997). A model for conducting a functional analysis of academic performance problems. School Psychology Review, 26, 554-574.
21. Duncan, H. D. (1967). The search for a social theory of communication in American sociology. In F. E. X. Dance (Ed.), Human communication theory (pp. 236-263). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
22. Dunson, R. M., Hughes, J. N., & Jackson, T. W. (1994). Effect of behavioral consultation on student and teacher behavior. Journal of School Psychology, 32, 247-266.
23. DuPaul, G. J.,& Eckert, T. L. (1997). School-based interventions for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A meta-analysis. School Psychology Review, 26, 5-27,
24. DuPaul, G. J., & Eckert, T. L. (1998). Academic interventions for students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A review of the literature. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 14, 59-82.
25. DuPaul, G. J., Jitendra, A. K., Volpe, R. J., Tresco, K. E., Lutz, J. G., Vile Junod, R. E., Cleary, K. S., Flammer, L. M., & Mannella, M. C. (in press). Consultation-based academic interventions for children with ADHD: Effects on reading and mathematics achievement. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology.
26. DuPaul, G. J., Power, T. J., Anastopoulos, A. D., & Reid, R. (1998). ADHD Rating Scale - IV. New York: Guilford Press.
27. DuPaul, G. J., & Stoner, G. (2003). ADHD in the schools: Assessment and intervention strategies (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
28. DuPaul, G. J., Volpe, R. J., Jitendra, A. K., Lutz, J. G., Lorah, K. S., & Gruber, R. (2004). Elementary school students with AD/HD: Predictors of academic achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 42, 285-301.
29. Elliott, S. N., & Von Brock Treuting, M. (1991). The Behavior Intervention Rating Scale: Development and validation of a pretreatment acceptability and effectiveness measure. Journal of School Psychology, 29, 43-51.
30. Erchul, W. P. (1987). A relational communication analysis of control in school consultation. Professional School Psychology, 2, 113-124.
31. Erchul, W. P. (1992). On dominance, cooperation, teamwork, and collaboration in school-based consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 3, 363-366.
32. Erchul, W. P. (1999). Two steps forward, one step back: Collaboration in school-based consultation. Journal of School Psychology, 37, 191-203.
33. Erchul, W. P. (2003). Communication and interpersonal processes in consultation: Guest editor's comments. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 14, 105-107.
34. Erchul, W. P., & Chewning, T. G. (1990). Behavioral consultation from a request-centered relational communication perspective. School Psychology Quarterly, 5, 1-20.
35. Erchul, W. P., Covington, C. G., Hughes, J. N., & Meyers, J. (1995). Further explorations of request-centered relational communication within school consultation. School Psychology Review, 24, 621-632.
36. Erchul, W. P., Grissom, P. F., & Getty, K. C. (in press). Studying interpersonal influence within school consultation: Social power base and relational communication perspectives. In W. P. Erchul & S. M. Sheridan (Eds.), Handbook of research in school consultation: Empirical foundations for the field. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Erchul, W. P., Hughes, J. N., Meyers, J., Hickman, J. A., & Braden, J. P. (1992). Dyadic agreement concerning the consultation process and its relationship to outcome. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 3, 119-132.
38. Erchul, W. P., & Raven, B. H. (1997). Social power in school consultation: A contemporary view of French and Raven's bases of power model. Journal of School Psychology, 35, 137-171.
39. Erchul, W. P., & Schulte, A. C. (1990). The coding of consultation verbalizations: How much is enough? School Psychology Quarterly, 5, 256-264.
40. Erchul, W. P., Sheridan, S. M., Ryan, D. A., Grissom, P. F., Killough, C. E., & Mettler, D. W. (1999). Patterns of relational communication in conjoint behavioral consultation. School Psychology Quarterly, 14, 121-147.
41. Escudero, V., & Rogers, L. E. (2004). Analyzing relational communication. In L. E. Rogers & V. Escudero (Eds.), Relational communication: An interactional perspective to the study of process and form (pp. 51-79). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Fagan, T. K., & Wise, P. S. (2000). School psychology: Past, present, and future (2nd ed.). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
43. Grissom, P. F., Erchul, W. P., & Sheridan, SM. (2003). Relationships among relational communication processes and perceptions of outcomes in conjoint behavioral consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 14, 157-180.
44. Gutkin, T. B. (1999a). Collaborative versus directive/ prescriptive/expert school-based consultation: Reviewing and resolving a false dichotomy. Journal of School Psychology, 37, 161-190.
45. Gutkin, T. B. (1999b). The collaboration debate: Finding our way through the maze: Moving forward into the future: A response to Erchul (1999). Journal of School Psychology, 37, 229-241.
46. Gutkin, T. B., & Curtis, M. J. (1999). School-based consultation theory and practice: The art and science of indirect service delivery. In C. R. Reynolds & T. B. Gutkin (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (3rd ed., pp. 598-637). New York: Wiley.
47. Hale, J. L., Burgoon, J. K., & Householder, B. (2005). The Relational Communication Scale. In V. L. Manusov (Ed.), The sourcebook of nonverbal measures: Going beyond words (pp. 127-139). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Hughes, J. N. (1992). Social psychological foundations of consultation. In F. J. Medway & T. P. Cafferty (Eds.), School psychology: A social psychological perspective (pp. 269-303). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Hughes, J. N., Erchul, W. P., Yoon, J., Jackson, T., & Henington, C. (1997). Consultant use of questions and its relationship to consultee evaluation of effectiveness. Journal of School Psychology, 35, 281-297.
50. Kiresuk, T. J., Smith, A., & Cardillo, J. E. (Eds.). (1994). Goal attainment scaling: Applications, theory and measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Mannuzza, S., Gittelman-Klein, R., Bessler, A., Malloy, P., & LaPadula, M. (1993). Adult outcome of hyperactive boys: Educational achievement, occupational rank, and psychiatric status. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50, 565-576.
52. Martens, B. K., Erchul, W. P., & Witt, J. C. (1992). Quantifying verbal interactions in school-based consultation: A comparison of four coding schemes. School Psychology Review, 21, 109-124.
53. Martin, R. (1978). Expert and referent power: A framework for understanding and maximizing consultation effectiveness. Journal of School Psychology, 16, 49-55.
54. Martin, R., & Curtis, M. (1980). Effects of age and experience of consultant and consultee on consultation outcome. American Journal of Community Psychology, 8, 733-736.
55. Medway, F. J., & Updyke, J. F. (1985). Meta-analysis of consultation outcome studies. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13, 489-504.
56. Millar, F. E., & Rogers, L. E. (1976). A relational approach to interpersonal communication. In G. R. Miller (Ed.), Explorations in interpersonal communication (pp. 87-103). Beverly Hills: Sage.
57. Millar, F. E., Rogers-Millar, L. E., & Courtright, J. A. (1979). Relational control and dyadic understanding: An exploratory predictive regression model. In D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication yearbook 3 (pp. 213-224). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
58. MTA Cooperative Group. (1999). A 14-month randomized clinical trial of treatment strategies for attentiondeficit/hyperactivity disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 56, 1073-1086.
59. O'Keefe, D. J., & Medway, F. J. (1997). The application of persuasion research to consultation in school psychology. Journal of School Psychology, 35, 173-193.
60. Parks, M. R. (1977). Relational communication: Theory and research. Human Communication Research, 3, 372-381.
61. Riggio, R. E., & Feldman, R. S. (Eds.). Applications of nonverbal communication. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
62. Rogers, L. E., & Escudero, V. (Eds.). (2004). Relational communication: An interactional perspective to the study of process and form. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
63. Rogers, L. E., & Farace, R. V. (1975). Analysis of relational communication in dyads: New measurement procedures. Human Communication Research, 1, 222-239.
64. Rogers-Millar, L. E., & Millar, F. (1979). Domineeringness and dominance: A transactional view. Human Communication Research, 5, 238-246.
65. Schulte, A. C., & Osborne, S. S. (2003). When assumptive worlds collide: A review of definitions of collaboration in consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 14, 109-138.
66. Shaffer, D., Fisher, P., & Lucas, C. (1998). Computerized Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (CDISC 4.0). New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute.
67. Sheridan, S. M., Eagle, J. W., Cowan, R. J., & Mickelson, W. (2001). The effects of conjoint behavioral consultation: Results of a 4-year investigation. Journal of School Psychology, 39, 361-385.
68. Sheridan, S. M., Kratochwill, T. R., & Bergan, J. (1996). Conjoint behavioral consultation: A procedural manual. New York: Plenum.
69. Sheridan, S. M., Welch, M., & Orme, S. F. (1996). Is consultation effective? A review of outcome research. Remedial and Special Education, 17, 341-354.
70. Sterling-Turner, H. E., Watson, T. S., & Moore, J. W. (2002). The effects of direct training and treatment integrity on treatment outcomes in school consultation. School Psychology Quarterly, 17, 47-77.
71. Tullar, W. L. (1989). Relational control in the employment interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 971-977.
72. Von Brock, M. B., & Elliott, S. N. (1987). Influence of treatment effectiveness information on the acceptability of classroom interventions. Journal of School Psychology, 25, 131-144.
73. Zins, J. E., & Erchul, W. P. (2002). Best practices in school consultation. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology - IV (pp. 625-643). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.