Two steps forward, one step back: Collaboration in school-based consultation

Journal of School Psychology

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 191-203

  Erchul, William P ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Communication; Consultation; Interpersonal influence

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033148695     PISSN: 00224405     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bachrach, A. J. (1981). Psychological Research: An Introduction (4th Ed.). New York: Random House.
2. Bergan, J. R. (1977). Behavioral Consultation. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
3. Bergan, J. R., & Kratochwill, T. R. (1990). Behavioral Consultation and Therapy. New York: Plenum.
4. Bergan, J. R., & Tombari, M. L. (1975). The analysis of verbal interactions occurring during consultation. Journal of School Psychology, 13, 209-226.
5. Burgoon, J. K., & Hale, J. L. (1984). The fundamental topoi of relational communication. Communication Monographs, 31, 193-214.
6. Busse, R. T., Kratochwill, T. R., & Elliott, S. N. (1995). Meta-analysis for single-case outcomes: Applications to research and practice. Journal of School Psychology, 33, 269-285.
7. Caplan, G. (1993). Epilogue. In W. P. Erchul (Ed.), Consultation in Community, School, and Organizational Practice: Gerald Caplan's Contributions to Professional Psychology (pp. 205-213). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.
8. Caplan, G., & Caplan, R. B. (1993). Mental Health Consultation and Collaboration. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Caplan, G., Caplan, R. B., & Erchul, W. P. (1994). Caplanian mental health consultation: historical background and current status. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 46(4), 2-12.
10. Cialdini, R. B. (1993). Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion (Rev. ed.). New York: William Morrow.
11. Conoley, J. C., & Gutkin, T. B. (1986). School psychology: A reconceptualization of service delivery realities. In S. N. Elliott & J. C. Witt (Eds.), The Delivery of Psychological Services in Schools: Concepts, Processes, and Issues (pp. 393-424). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Conoley, J. C., & Gutkin, T. B. (1995). Why didn't - why doesn't - school psychology realize its promise? Journal of School Psychology, 33, 209-217.
13. Erchul, W. P. (1987). A relational communication analysis of control in school consultation. Professional School Psychology, 2, 113-124.
14. Erchul, W. P. (1992). On dominance, cooperation, teamwork, and collaboration in school- based consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 3, 363-366.
15. Erchul, W. P., & Chewning, T. G. (1990). Behavioral consultation from a request-centered relational communication perspective. School Psychology Quarterly, 5, 1-20.
16. Erchul, W. P., Covington, C. G., Hughes, J. N., & Meyers, J. (1995). Further explorations of request-centered relational communication within school consultation. School Psychology Review, 24, 621-632.
17. Erchul, W. P., Hughes, J. N., Meyers, J., Hickman, J. A., & Braden, J. P. (1992). Dyadic agreement concerning the consultation process and its relationship to outcome. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 3, 119-132.
18. Erchul, W. P., & Raven, B. H. (1997). Social power in school consultation: A contemporary view of French and Raven's bases of power model. Journal of School Psychology, 35, 137-171.
19. Erchul, W. P., Sheridan, S. M., Ryan, D. A., Grissom, P. F., Killough, C. E., & Mettler, D. W. (in press). Patterns of relational communication in conjoint behavioral consultation. School Psychology Quarterly.
20. Folger, J. P., & Puck, S. (1976). Coding relational communication: A question approach. Paper Presented at The April Meeting of the International Communication Association, Portland, OR.
21. Folger, J. P., & Sillars, A. (1980). Relational coding and perceptions of dominance. In B. W. Morse & L. A. Phelps (Eds)., Interpersonal Communication: A Relational Approach (pp. 322-333). Minneapolis: Burgess.
22. Gutkin, T. B. (1996). Patterns of consultant and consultee verbalizations: Examining communication leadership during initial consultation interviews. Journal of School Psychology, 34, 199-219.
23. Gutkin, T. B. (1997). An introduction to the mini-series: The social psychology of inter- personal influence with adults. Journal of School Psychology, 35, 105-106.
24. Gutkin, T. B. (1999). Collaborative versus directive/prescriptive/expert school-based consultation: Reviewing and resolving a false dichotomy. Journal of School Psychology, 37, 161-190.
25. Gutkin, T. B., & Conoley, J. C. (1990). Reconceptualizing school psychology from a service delivery perspective: Implications for practice, training, and research. Journal of School Psychology, 28, 203-223.
26. Haley, J. (1987). Problem-solving Therapy (2nd Ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27. Heatherington, L., & Friedlander, M. L. (1987). Family Relational Communication Coding System Manual. (Available from Laurie Heatherington, Psychology Department, Williams College, Williamstown, MA 01267.)
28. Hughes, J. N. (1992). Social psychology foundations of consultation. In F. J. Medway & T. P. Cafferty (Eds.), School Psychology: A Social Psychological Perspedive (pp. 269-303). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Hughes, J. N., Erchul, W. P., Yoon, J., Jackson, T., & Henington, C. (1997). Consultant use of questions and its relationship to consultee evaluation of effectiveness. Journal of School Psychology, 35, 281-297.
30. Jackson, D. D. (1959). Family interaction, family homeostasis and some implications for conjoint family therapy. In J. H. Masserman (Ed.), Individual and Familiar Dynamics. New York: Grune & Stratton.
31. Kratochwill, T. R. (1991). Defining constructs in consultation research: An important agenda in the 1990s. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 2, 291-294.
32. Kratochwill, T. R., & Bergan, J. R. (1990). Behavioral Consultation in Applied Settings: An Individual Guide. New York: Plenum.
33. Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal Diagnosis of Personality. New York: Roland.
34. Medway, F. J., & Updyke, J. F. (1985). Meta-analysis of consultation outcome studies. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13, 489-504.
35. Millar, F. E., & Rogers, L. E. (1987). Relational dimensions of interpersonal dynamics. In M. E. Roloff & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Interpersonal Processes: New Directions in Communication Research (pp. 117-139). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
36. O'Keefe, D. J., & Medway, F. J. (1997). The application of persuasion research to consultation in school psychology. Journal of School Psychology, 35, 173-193.
37. Phillips, V., & McCullough, L. (1990). Consultation-based programming: Instituting the collaborative ethic in schools. Exceptional Children, 56, 291-304.
38. Rogers, L. E., & Farace, R. V. (1975). Analysis of relational communication in dyads: New measurement procedures. Human Communication Research, 1, 222-239.
39. Schulte, A. C., & Osborne, S. S. (1993). What is collaborative consultation? The eye of the beholder. In D. Fuchs (Chair), Questioning Popular Beliefs about Collaborative Consultation. Symposium presented at the annual April meeting of the Council for Exceptional Children, San Antonio, TX.
40. Sheridan, S. M. (1992). What do we mean when we say "Collaboration"? Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 3, 89-92.
41. Sheridan, S. M., Welch, M., & Orme, S. F. (1996). Is consultation effective? A review of outcome research. Remedial and Special Education, 17, 341-354.
42. Strong, S. R., & Hills, H. I. (1986). Interpersonal Communication Rating Scale. Richmond, VA: Virginia Commonwealth University.
43. Tracey, T. J., & Ray, P. B. (1984). Stages of successful time-limited counseling: An interactional examination. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 16, 212-219.