Analyzing relational communication

Relational Communication: An Interactional Perspective to the Study of Process and Form

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 51-80

  Escudero, Valentín ^a   Rogers, L Edna ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF A CORUÑA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750012406     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410609656     Document Type: Chapter

References (28)

1. Bakeman, R., McArthur, D., & Quera, V. (1996). Detecting group differences in sequential association using sampled permutations: Log odds, kappa, and phi compared. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 28, 446–457.
2. Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (1992). SDIS: A sequential data interchange standard. Behavior Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 24, 554–559.
3. Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (1995a). Analyzing interaction: Sequential analysis with SDIS and GSEQ. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (1995b). Log-linear approaches to lag-sequential analysis when consecutive codes can and can not repeat. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 272–284.
5. Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (1996).Análisis de la interacción: Análisis secuencial con SDIS y GSEQ. Madrid: Ra-Ma.
6. Bakeman, R., Robinson, B. F., & Quera, V. (1996). Testing sequential association: Estimating exact P values using sampled permutations. Psychological Methods, 1, 4–15.
7. Bateson, G. (1936). Naven. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
8. Bavelas, J. B., Rogers, L. E., & Millar, F. E. (1985). Interpersonal conflict. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol. 4, pp. 9–26). New York: Academic Press.
9. Beyebach, M., & Escudero, V. (1997). Therapeutic interaction and dropout: Measuring relational communication in solution-focused therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 19, 173–212.
10. Beyebach, M., Rogríguez-Morejón, A., Palenzuela, D. L., & Rodríguez-Arias, J. L. (1996). Research on the process of solution-focused therapy. In S. D. Miller, M. A. Hubble, & B. Duncan (Eds.), Handbook of solution brief therapy: Foundations, applications, and research (pp. 157–194). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11. Brown, M. B. (1974). Identification of the sources of significance in two-way contingency tables. Applied Statistics, 23, 405–413.
12. Cureton, E. E. (1959). A note on phi/phimax. Psychometrika, 24, 90–91.
13. Escudero, V., Heatherington, L., & Friedlander, M. L. (1998, June). Integrative analysis of interpersonal control, cognitive constructions, and emotions in couple interaction: An illustrative case. Paper presented at the meetings of the Society for Interpersonal Interaction Research, Snowbird, Utah.
14. Escudero, V., Rogers, L. E., & Gutierrez, E. (1997). Patterns of relational control and nonverbal affect in clinic and nonclinic couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 5–29.
15. Gottman, J. M. (1979). Marital interaction: Experimental investigations. New York: Academic Press.
16. Gottman, J. M., & Roy, A. K. (1990). Sequential analysis: A guide for behavioral researchers. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
17. Haberman, S. J. (1978). Analysis of qualitative data: Vol 1. New York: Academic Press.
18. Millar, F. E., & Rogers, L. E. (1987). Relational dimensions of interpersonal dynamics. In M. Roloff & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Explorations in interpersonal processes: New directions in communication research (pp. 117–139). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19. Millar, F. E., Rogers, L. E., &Bavelas, J. B. (1984). Identifying patterns of verbal conflict in interpersonal dynamics. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 48, 232–246.
20. Morley, D. D. (1987). Revised lag-sequential analysis. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication Yearbook: Vol. 10 (pp. 172–182). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21. Quera, V., & Bakeman, R. (1999). “Untangling the web:” Técnicas de tamizado de residuos en el análisis de secuencias de conducta. In A. M. López, J. López, & R. Moreno (Eds.), Actas del V congreso de metodología de las ciencias humanas y sociales: Vol 1. Sevilla: Editorial Kronos.
22. Rogers, L. E., & Bagarozzi, D. A. (1983). An overview of relational communication and implications for therapy. In D. A. Bagarozzi, A. P. Jurich, & R. W. Jackson (Eds.), Marital and family therapy (pp. 48–78). New York: Human Sciences Press.
23. Rogers, L. E., Courtright, J. A., & Millar, F. E. (1980). Message control intensity: Rationale and preliminary findings. Communication Monographs, 47, 201–219.
24. Rogers-Millar, L. E., & Millar, F. E. (1979). Domineeringness and dominance: A transactional view. Human Communication Research, 5, 238–246.
25. Rogers, L. E., Millar, F. E., & Bavelas, J. B. (1985). Methods for analyzing marital conflict discourse: Implications of a systems approach. Family Process, 24, 53–72.
26. Wampold, B. E. (1989). Kappa as a measure of pattern in sequential data. Quality & Quantity, 23, 171–187.
27. Wampold, B. E. (1992). The intensive examination of social interaction. In T. R. Kratochwill & J. R. Thomas (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education (pp. 93–131). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Yoder, P. J., & Feurer, I. D. (2000). Quantifying the magnitude of sequential association between events of behaviors. In T. Thompson, D. Felce, & F. J. Symons (Eds.), Behavioral observation: Technology and applications in developmental disabilities (pp. 317–333). Baltimore, MD: P. H. Brookes.